In the article "In Defense of the Media", which is about how the media helped during the Civil Rights movement. First, in the sentence, "Particularly since the advent of television, Americans are able to feel more empathy for others who are being oppressed, which can help to bring about positive social change." basically saying that the media is trying to aid the oppressed. Like saying that the media doesn't want the public to be oppressed, so they give the public information about what is going on in the US to make the public relize what is going on in the US. Second, it also says "Cameras were rolling on a peaceful march from Selma to Montgomery, held to protest the denial of African-American citizens’ right to vote. The march ended in police brutality against …show more content…
In "In Defense of the Media" it says "Disturbing images of young people being beaten for the color of their skin were broadcast on national television. Everyone was watching, and Americans began realizing what was going on in their country. Many people were outraged by the violence they saw, which led them to take action and seek unity." or in other words, the public was very oppressed untill they found out what was going on in their country. Both the essays show that media can help during time of war and conflict. For example in the essay "How media helped win World war 2" it says " People turned in wedding bands, buttons, and other spare metal to be melted down for military equipment". Because of the media people were willing to give up wedding bands and other things they