Media Portrayal of Disability/Facial Disfigurement and Its Impact on a 'Disabled Identity'
Media portrayal of disability/facial disfigurement and its impact on a 'disabled identity '
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how, from a historical perspective, media representation has impacted on the lives of people with disabilities, with a focus on facial disfigurement. A comparison between the terms ‘impairment’ and ‘disabled’ will clearly identify a difference between the concepts in terms of the medical and social models of disability. The paper will continue by analysing how negative media imagery has served to diminish the lives of people with facial disfigurement and ultimately been responsible for creating a ‘disabled identity’. Furthermore, the paper will highlight the shift from the medical model to a social model of disability, while taking into account the views and perceptions of groups of people with disabilities.
It is important to consider the difference between the terms ‘impairment’ and ‘disabled’. Mason (2000) describes impairment as a characteristic, feature or attribute within an individual which is long term and may affect an individual’s appearance or affect the functioning of that individual’s mind or body, because of, or regardless of society. Mason further suggests that disabled people are those with impairments who are disabled by barriers in society. This includes people with physical impairments, people with visual impairments, people with learning difficulties and those who have experienced mental illness.
The two terms ‘impairment’ and ‘disabled’ signal a difference between the concepts, in terms of the medical and social models of disability. According to Clough and Corbett (2000) the medical model points to practices which call on pathology. (that is, a science of disease) The model focuses on sickness, rather than health and reactive measures instead of preventative measures. Hence, under the medical model, disabled people are defined by their impairment, illness or medical condition. Open University
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how, from a historical perspective, media representation has impacted on the lives of people with disabilities, with a focus on facial disfigurement. A comparison between the terms ‘impairment’ and ‘disabled’ will clearly identify a difference between the concepts in terms of the medical and social models of disability. The paper will continue by analysing how negative media imagery has served to diminish the lives of people with facial disfigurement and ultimately been responsible for creating a ‘disabled identity’. Furthermore, the paper will highlight the shift from the medical model to a social model of disability, while taking into account the views and perceptions of groups of people with disabilities.
It is important to consider the difference between the terms ‘impairment’ and ‘disabled’. Mason (2000) describes impairment as a characteristic, feature or attribute within an individual which is long term and may affect an individual’s appearance or affect the functioning of that individual’s mind or body, because of, or regardless of society. Mason further suggests that disabled people are those with impairments who are disabled by barriers in society. This includes people with physical impairments, people with visual impairments, people with learning difficulties and those who have experienced mental illness.
The two terms ‘impairment’ and ‘disabled’ signal a difference between the concepts, in terms of the medical and social models of disability. According to Clough and Corbett (2000) the medical model points to practices which call on pathology. (that is, a science of disease) The model focuses on sickness, rather than health and reactive measures instead of preventative measures. Hence, under the medical model, disabled people are defined by their impairment, illness or medical condition. Open University
References: Clough, P. and Corbett, J. (2000) Theories of Inclusive Education. London: Chapman Publishing Cumberbatch, G Goffman, E.(1968) Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Harmondsworth.Penguin KIDS AS SELF ADVOCATES (2012) Disability Culture Series: Disability Portrayal and Media Today [online] Longmore, P,K. (1985). Screening stereotypes: Images of disabled people.Social policy 16 pp.31-32 Lucas, V Mason, M. (2000) Incurably Human. 2nd ed. Nottingham: Working Press. McEachran, R. (2012) The Independent blogs.[online].[Accessed 5 May 2012].[Available at: http://blogs.independent.co.uk/author/rich-mceachran/ Norden, M, (1994) The Cinema of isolation The Open University (2006) Inclusive teaching [online]. [Accessed 5 May 2012]. Available at: http://www.open.ac.uk/inclusiveteaching/pages/understanding-and-awareness/models-of-disability.php Pearson, A Safran, S,P. (1998) The journal of Special Education.THE FIRT CENTURY OF DISABILITY PORTRAYAL IN FILM:AN ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE.31 (4) pp. 467-479. Schroeder, J. E. (1998) 'Consuming Representation: A Visual Approach to Consumer Research '. In Barbara B Stern (Ed.): Representing Consumers: Voices, Views and Visions. London: Routledge. Whittington-Walsh, F. From Freaks to Savants: disability and hegemony from The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) to Sling Blade (1997) 17 (6) pp 695-707 Zola, I.K.(1985)