Preview

Medical Law and Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medical Law and Ethics
Marisela Perez
Ms. Tan
Due Thursday, November 28th, 2010 1. Explain patient-physician contract
A physician has the right, after forming a contract or agreeing to accept a patient under his or her care, to make reasonable limitation on the contractual relationship. The physician is under no legal obligation to treat patients who may wish to exceed those limitations. Under the patient-physician contract, both parties have certain rights and responsibilities. 2. Patient right and responsibilities
Patients have the right to choose a physician; although some managed care plans may limit choices. Patients also have the right to terminate a physician’s services if they wish. 3. Patient responsibilities
Patients are also part of the medical team involved in their treatment. Patients have the responsibility under an implied contract to:
Follow any instructions given by the physician and cooperate as much as possible.
Give all relevant information to the physician in order to reach a correct diagnosis. If a patient fails to inform a physician of any medical conditions he or she may have and an incorrect diagnosis is made, the physician is not liable.
Follow the physician’s order for treatment.
Pay the fees charged for services provided. 4. Informed consent
Informed consent involves the patient’s right to receive all information relative to his or her condition and to make a decision regarding treatment based upon that knowledge.
II. Doctrine of informed consent
The doctrine of informed consent is the legal basis for informed consent and is usually outlined in a state’s medical practice acts. 5. What are the special circumstances for physician practices

6. Define malpractice claims
Malpractice claims are lawsuits by a patient against a physician for errors in diagnosis or treatment. 7. Give examples of negligence
Not taking care of someone or something, the result of which is harm to that person or thing. Neglect those results in abuse.
Examples:
-

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    A patient can not win a lawsuit with a doctor for claiming that the doctor did not comply with consent forms the patient must have been injured and “there must be a connection between the lack of informed consent and your injury.” The patient must claim “with the right information, you wouldn't have consented to the medical treatment that ended up harming you” An example previously mentioned would be the Darviris vs. Petros case, Darviris claimed she wouldn't have agreed to the procedure performed on her because of a family member’s complications with the same procedure. To win a malpractice lawsuit related to informed consent “the harm you suffered wasn't disclosed as a known risk of the procedure, even though most doctors would have discussed that particular risk as part of the informed consent process.” If a doctor kept risks from a patient and those risks harmed the patient the lawsuit would usually favor the patients. An lawsuit example would be Martin vs. Lowney, MArtin claimed that ehn being explained the procedure she was told that the scar would be one inch in length. When she woke up she had a six inch scar on her stomach. She accused Lowney of not explaining in full detail all the risks of the operation and not providing all information required for informed consent. When MArtin was explaining the incision had released bacteria into her bloodstream it…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spence case, both parties were in a lawsuit about informed consent. The physician failed to tell the patient of the risks that can happen while going into surgery and any risks that can happen after the surgery. The patient was told of the surgery but did not ask for any additional information. For my personal choice in this case i would find both sides responsible for some of the factors that has happened in the decision making of the physician and the patient. I believe that if the patient has a well grounded mind then the physician should tell them about all the risks for the precare, the surgery itself, and the postoperative care. All of this information can help to save the hospital from a lawsuit. Also, when the patient is presented with an illness that can be helped with an operation they should always do some research about it. This includes being able to ask additional questions and concerns to the…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Informed Consent |Explanation of the risks and benefits of a treatment or |Patient and attending |Before anesthesia and |…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cobbs V. Grant Case Study

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Grant case brings up the issue of informed consent. In this case the surgeon, Dr. Grant informed the patient, Mr. Cobbs that he had an intractable peptic duodenal ulcer, which required surgery. In this case the surgeon failed to inform the patient of the risks associated with the initial surgery. The legal principle of informed consent is the patient has the right to know about all of the risks and benefits of a certain medical procedure before making a decision to either accept or unaccept that procedure. The court found for Dr. Grant, and they point out that there was no evidence to indicate that Mr. Cobbs known about the adverse effects of the surgery, he would not have consented to the operation. The plaintiff could not prove negligence was a result of the lack of informed consent. The complications associated with the surgery were expected risks therefore negligence was not present. However, I really think the surgeon should inform the patient of all the risks and the side effects of the…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rlt2 Task 4

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages

    ''A physician owes to his patient the duty to disclose in a reasonable manner all significant medical information that the physician possesses that is material to an intelligent decision by the patient whether to undergo a procedure ''. Marvin V Lowney, 401 Mass. 1006 (1988).…

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Current and Future Legal and Ethical Obligations of State & Federal Statutory Enactments State Statutory Enactments:  Consent  Confidentiality  Informed Consent  Implied Consent Federal Statutory Enactments:  Medical Patient Rights Act  Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)  Uniform Anatomical Gift Act  Patient Self-Determination Act State & Federal Regulatory Enactments State Regulatory Enactments: Federal Regulatory Enactments: …

    • 416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Helling V. Carey

    • 4538 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Rarely any physician intends to harm patients when he or she provides treatment to them. Patients see physicians and specialists in full faith that they will get help with a condition. What complicates the patient-doctor relationship is that the outcome of each patient’s treatment is different because of individual health conditions and the course of treatment chosen by the doctor. Problems arise when a patient is not satisfied with care provided by the doctor or in extreme cases when a patient dies. Since most of the time it is hard to clearly determine whether the outcome was solely a result of the course of treatment chosen by the doctor or whether other factors played a role too, quite often patients take their grievances to court to seek justice. What makes these kind of cases complicated is the “What would have been if…?” scenarios where one can only guess what the outcome of the treatment would have been had a different course of treatment been chosen because the proximate causes of injuries are not easy to determine.…

    • 4538 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case presented for discussion described above, it was imminent that Dr. Yarnell had a justifiable medical history that supported his symptoms. Nonetheless, it can be argued the way PA Brian decided to evaluate and treat Dr. Yarnell was biased or based on personal interests. PA Brian’s medical judgment was compromised. Mutual personal motivations existed between Dr. Yarnell and PA Brian. However, as a clinician PA Brian should have impartially evaluated Dr. Yarnell by properly and examining and documenting his findings or properly redirecting Dr.Yarnell to a different clinician. If the patient (Dr. Yarnell) was never appropriately examined, how can PA Brian as a health care provider substantiate that the medication prescribed was adequate and beneficial for the…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A physician that performs surgery on a patient without the proper consent is considered assault. Physicians must ensure that every patient understands what is being discussed to them; the responsibility lies solely with healthcare professionals to communicate treatment options, diagnoses, risk, and benefits.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Informed consent is when you get permission from someone before giving care to that person and they have the choice to accept or refuse the care. Some issues a health care professional might face could be confidentiality, relationships with patients and matters related to consent, especially in the treatment of minors. Also you may have issues with making a decision to turn-off life support. The laws of HIPAA would need to be kept up to date as they do change often. With the HIPAA laws, discussing patients with those involved such as family and friends can be done under certain conditions. Although there are many efforts to keep confidentiality safe, it is still difficult to accomplish. Staff should be trained on how to discuss patient information…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence can be defined as failure to take the proper steps to prevent injury or illness to a person. Malpractice occurs when someone lacking the skill and training causes injury to a patient (Buzzachi, Scellato, & Ughetto, 2016). Malpractice claims are much more common that we think. In the United States, there are anywhere from 15,000-19,000 malpractice claims per year. The relationship between the patient and the provider is fostered and maintained through trust.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivf Pros And Cons

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    informed consent: “demands that all patients be allowed to freely consent to or decline treatments and that they receive the information they need to make informed judgements about them” (Vaughn, 2013).…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Informed Consent

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everyone has had moments while they're at the doctors office when they have no idea what is ailing them and all they want is answers. Nothing feels more of a relief than your physician coming in and telling you that you're are perfectly healthy. But what if we lived in a world where you were not informed of any treatments or tests that you were receiving. Informed consent defined is permission granted in the knowledge of the possible consequences, typically that which is given by a patient to a doctor for treatment with full knowledge of the possible risks and benefits. Treatment and informed consent can be a very complex and controversial topic. There have been many legal disputes involving treatment and informed consent. I myself believe…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Informed Consent Laws  Patient signs agreement  Patient is informed…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Liability

    • 5054 Words
    • 17 Pages

    -Lawsuit over medical malpractice after a teenager required brain surgery and sustained permanent injuries when a physician failed to properly diagnose a brain infection. Lawsuit targeted hospital even though treating physician was not a hospital employee.…

    • 5054 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays