Preview

Medical Paternalism or Patient Autonomy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medical Paternalism or Patient Autonomy
Medical Paternalism or Patient Autonomy
At issue in the controversy over medical paternalism is the problem of patient autonomy. Medical paternalism can be defined as interfering with a patient’s freedom for his or her own well-being; patient autonomy means being able to act and make a decision intentionally, with understanding, and without controlling influences (Munson, 38 & 39). The principle of informed consent has come to be essential to any philosophical analysis of the tension between medical paternalism and patient autonomy in healthcare decision-making. However, despite the obligatory duties physicians have to their patients, patient involvement and informed consent should be valued in certain medical cases.
Consider, for example, the case of Monica, a 49-year-old woman who was admitted to the hospital for acute respiratory insufficiency. As a heavy smoker, she had been experiencing dyspnea. Upon examination it appeared she had several abnormalities in the chest. Following this she became cyanotic and nearly lost all consciousness. Furthermore, a bronchoscopy revealed a large, tumor-like mass in her trachea. Upon further examination it was determined by a multidisciplinary treatment team that Monica was so advanced in the tumor, removing it would not be possible, either by surgery or laser. In addition, chemotherapy and radiation therapy would not have helped and implanting a stent would have been difficult. Monica had at most three more months to live. With such factors taken into consideration, the team devised four possible alternatives: remove life-sustaining measures, continue mechanical ventilation and heavy sedation without treating any complications, implant a stent without Monica’s consent, or wake Monica and inform her on the diagnosis and possible alternatives while giving her the final choice. However, the team does not believe that Monica will have the full autonomy to make a rational decision on her own. Furthermore, the team worry



Cited: Korsgaard, C. M., Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. 1990 Munson, R. Intervention and Relfection. Boston: Clark Baxter, 2012. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We all enjoy our right to autonomy, the freedom to express what can be done to us, the right for self-determination. “Autonomy is based on a person’s ability make rational choices concerning their own life and choose for themselves. They must be treated with respect without interfering with their ability to determine their own paths and make decisions for oneself” (Vaughn 9). The freedom of autonomy gives patients the right decide their healthcare decisions without the influence of the values of their physicians, their colleagues, or society (Schwartz 105).…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henrietta Lacks

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Topic: What is the duty of a medical doctor/researcher to inform his/her subjects on the implications of their medical consent? Historically, how does social justice play a role in this relationship?…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dnr Ethical Dilemmas

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Patient Preferences: The patient has not been involved in the decisions regarding her current treatment, and did not have a DNR in place or an advance directive in place regarding situations such as this. The family who had been acting as surrogates, were ready to stop treatment and place a DNR based on the prognosis given about the patient. As of now no one has fully assessed the patient's decision making capacity or asked the patient about her preferences, despite her regaining consciousness and her improved mental state.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the medical field there emerges a conflict that all physicians will eventually come to deal with, or are already dealing with regularly; that is the conflict of Autonomy and informed consent versus Paternalism and the doctor's intervention. In one hand, Autonomy is the principle of non-interference and the right to self-governance; informed consent is the concept that "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body…(102)" it is the exercise of a choice after being informed of the process and risks of a medical treatment. While in the other hand lies Paternalism; "the interference with, limitation of, or usurpation of individual autonomy justified by reasons referring exclusively…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There may be a situation where decisions about a patient’s medical care aren’t clear cut. For example, a patient with dementia may be competent to decide about health care one day, but then at another time…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CJHS430

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    De Bord, J. (2014). ETHICS IN MEDICINE University of Washington School of Medicine. Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/consent.html…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a doctor makes a decision for a patient in the name of health, the doctor is violating his or her autonomy. By autonomy, I mean the patient’s right to make medical decisions in terms of his or her health. Consider the following case: a patient has an advanced stage cancer that likely leads to death within a month, but the patient has a slim chance to survive through chemotherapy – which on its own is painful. If Collins was the doctor, he may mislead the patient, exaggerate the chances of survival, and convince the patient to opt for chemotherapy in the “best interest” of the patient’s health. But the patient’s “best interest” is subjective based on the perspective of the doctor or the patient.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “four principles of biomedical ethics of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice” (Cooper, 2012), however, this case shows autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence clashing. The patient and her family have the right to determine the patient’s care; yet, following the patient’s mother’s decision has the potential of causing harm to the…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As adults and human beings we have certain inalienable rights to make decisions regardless of whether they are deemed as poor or inappropriate by others. One must take into consideration the level of understanding and competence a patient possesses to assure they are informed of all options and repercussions; the other must be whether the individual is harming anyone other than themselves by making said decision. Once those issues have been taken into consideration there must be an allowance for an individual to make their own well-informed choice, even though as a practitioner, we may feel it is not in their best interest.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Autonomy is integral to health care; however, promoting and sustaining patient autonomy may be more difficult to enact than is often suggested. According to Hewitt-Taylor (2004), the concept of autonomy becomes more complex when the patient is a child, or an adult who has learning disabilities or a mental health problem that might be considered to impinge on their ability to make informed decisions. An adult with a mental health problem, who is unable to function autonomously has to rely on their caregivers and POAs for their care. In situations like this, health care staff need to be aware of the legal as well as moral and ethical issues involved when facilitating autonomous choices for their patients (Edgar, et al., 2001). The distinction…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Promoting patient’s autonomy is showing a sense of respect the patients. This can be violated very easy, it is the nurse responsibility to provide some sort of safety to prevent this from occurring. By educating the patients is recommended in all healthcare environment. When these patients understand that they have the right to their medical information, and also they have right to make any decision, they will be able to advocate themselves and prevent it. Educating the patient as a preventive measure that will also prevent any ethical dilemma advanced practice nurses’ moral distress. As a result, this can be done by explaining to the patient all the legal aspect while they are in the hospital. Another recommendation that could be made to prevent the violation of patient veracity and autonomy which may resolve advanced practice nurses’ moral distress in the dilemma, the healthcare providers should always encourage patients to seek care that promotes the individual patient’s medical interests. It might be thought that this approach fails to respect patient autonomy.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reimbursement Issues

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As covered by the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990, NPs must understand that patient autonomy includes patients having the right to make their healthcare decisions and the right to privacy in that their conditions and treatments are kept between the patient and the NP. The relationship between the patient and NP can be a fragile one, and the NP must ensure they are giving the care that the patient is requesting (Walker,…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    P5

    • 1195 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Autonomy lets people have the right to control what happens to their bodies. This principle simply means that an informed, competent adult patient can refuse or accept treatments, drugs, and surgeries according to their wishes. People have the right to control what happens to their bodies because they are free and rational. And these decisions must be respected by everyone, even if those decisions aren’t in the best interest of the patient.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction This write up is part of assessment for Preparation for Professional Practice module designed to help the student practitioner understand the issues that influence consent by critically reflecting and evaluating the professional, legal and ethical frameworks, for autonomous patient, those that lack capacity and for children. In this discussion, I will include the importance of establishing whether a person has capacity to give consent, what constitutes a valid consent, the various types of consent and the duration of that consent (www.gov.uk). Definition Consent is an active process of agreeing to an activity or permitting an activity to occur (O'Shea, 2011).…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case weak parentalisim is exhibited. When using parentalisim one needs to understand that the patient is autonomous and self-self-determining is having his wishes refused. “Autonomy is a term used to describe a person's or government's ability to make decisions,…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays