Preview

Meditations And Nolan's Inception: Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meditations And Nolan's Inception: Film Analysis
Descartes, French philosopher and father of modern western philosophy, wrote Meditations on First Philosophy in order to question common knowledge and the world around him. Similarly, Christopher Nolan’s inception questions these very same topics. Both works cause their audiences to question what they know and what is real. The topic of dreams and reality are prominent throughout Descartes’ Meditations and Nolan’s Inception.
In his Meditations on First Philosophy, specifically Meditation I, Descartes questions different “falsehoods that [he] had accepted as true in [his] childhood” (Descartes 12). He reflects on the fact that everything that he knows is based on these so called falsehoods and realizes that he must start from the beginning in order to achieve true knowledge. Descartes writes about the senses and how they can be deceiving. Although he states that they can be deceiving, generally what is perceived through the senses is true and can be trusted. He then moves on to discuss dreams and how what we think of when we dream comes from our
…show more content…
In the movie the protagonist Dominic Cobb has to undergo the task of inception itself. Cobb’s main job in the movie is to go into the minds of the people in the world around him and extract different types of valuable information. Once Cobb’s actions are revealed, a man by the name of Mr. Saito gives him the chance to save his own life. Since Cobb’s activities are illegal he is being looked for by the police, but if he helps Saito and succeeds then he will be granted his freedom. Saito’s objective is to plant an idea in the mind of Mr. Fischer Jr. in order to make sure that he does not become more powerful than him in the business world. Throughout the movie Cobb faces challenges as a result of the memories of Mal; his dead wife. Mal seems to haunt Cobb’s mind making it difficult for him to distinguish between the real world and the dream

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    3. Was colonial rule a transforming, even a revolutionary, experience, or did it serve to freeze or preserve existing social and economic patterns? What evidence can you find to support both sides of this argument?…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes' dream argument comes off to me is that we cannot fully trust our senses especially with the difference of dreaming and being awake. Descartes did state that he could be dreaming things since he was fooled into believing he was awake in the past. This argument goes on to say that their isn't an actual way to tell if you are dreaming or if you're awake. Since from Descrates' point of view we are not sure what is real and what is an actual dream in that our senses can be easily fooled into believing whatever the mind wants us to believe.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The company is struggling with consistency of performance among its teams, not all managers are demonstrating the capability of leading and creating self-sufficient teams. “Too many managers assume that if we just put people together on a team, they will know how to function effectively” (Dyer JR, Dyer, & Dyer, 2013). Organizations and its leaders must understand the critical role that they play in the effectiveness of a team. Team members must be trained to be cohesive and contributing members. It is why managers play an enormous role in the efficiency of a team. They guide the daily operations and overall organizational atmosphere. Managers can create poor performing teams or high performing teams, create a path for success, and produce…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes, on a quest for truth, liberates himself from all his beliefs. Applying his method of doubt, he throws away everything he knows in a process of eradication and reconstruction as he then looks for beliefs which are certain and indubitable. Aware of the daunting task ahead, Descartes pinpoints his attack on what he considers the foundational basis of reality, perception along with its credibility. Dreams can oftentimes be so realistic that we are convinced that a dream…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes was a part of the dream argument. The Dream Argument was “proof” that the sense should not be fully trusted when distinguishing reality from illusions. Descartes…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes's Dream Argument

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He says, “I remind myself that on many occasions I have in sleep been deceived by similar illusions,” so he seems to be relying on some knowledge to the effect that he has actually dreamt in the past and that he remembers having been “deceived” by those dreams. That is more than he actually needs for his reflections about knowledge to have the force he thinks they have. He does not need to support his judgement that he has actually dreamt in the past. The only thought he needs is that is now possible for him to be dreaming that he is sitting by the fire, and that if that possibility were realized he would not know that he is sitting by the fire. Of course it was no doubt true that Descartes had dreamt in the past and that his knowledge that he had done so was partly what he was going on in acknowledging the possibility of his dreaming on this particular occasion. But neither the fact of past dreams nor knowledge of their actual occurrence would seem to be strictly required in order to grant what Descartes relies on – the possibility of dreaming, and the absence of knowledge if that possibility were realized. (p. 17)…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes False Reality

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    Dreams have been a part of humanity for decades and as technology progresses the mystery has continually been brought to attention. While science has enhanced dramatically, no true explanation of dreams has been made, there are countless theories behind the purpose and cause of dreams. Descartes was one of the many philosophers and scientists to investigate the strange world of dreams and what it reveals about the “real” world. The ambiguity and obscurity of dreams allows interesting interpretations not only from scientists but also artists. Christopher Nolan’s film Inception demonstrates Descartes' ideas of dreams being a false reality and the presence of a deceiver creating these illusions, just as the main character Cobb tricks individuals…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes claims in his Discourse on Method that our dreams and conscious thoughts are untrue, but is this truly the case? Because of these questions of existence, it seems like, if Descartes’s arguments are taken a certain way, his arguments might be taken to imply that our lives are just a dream. Are we living in a universal soap opera directed by the Divine, and the question of who shot J.R. will never be resolved because we will all wake on Judgment Day from the dream of existence? If we are questioning existence, how can we know that our lives are just dreams? Descartes says in marginal 32 that “[…] the same thoughts we have while awake can come to us also while we are sleeping, without there being any that are then true […],” which…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes from his very first Meditation, that of concerning things that can be called in to doubt, gives reasons on why we should doubt all things, material or non-material, to be not true. He further goes on to state that, we must continue to doubt these things as being not true as long as we have no other reason to believe in their existence, except for the scientific basis on which those things may have been founded or are rather based upon. Descartes starts off by saying that a person's basic senses, meaning that his/her sense of touch, taste, smell, hearing and sight will each at least prove to be deceptive to them once in their lifetime. From this Descartes concurs that you can't trust your senses since if they have deceived you once, what are the chances that they won't deceive you again. Even though Descartes states that one shouldn't trust his senses all the time, how ever when it comes to deriving the existence of small and distinct things, one also according to Descartes can not deny the existence of those very senses. Descartes during his first meditation also comes to the conclusion that the eyes, head and hands and the whole body of a human being in general are not imaginary things. This is due to the fact that according to Descartes, things seen during dreams "like painted images could not have only been produced in the likeness of true things" (Descartes, 28). Descartes even takes this a step further by stating that a painter's artistic representation is merely a product that is composed of the painter's already existing thoughts & his…

    • 2568 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to use the scientific methods Descartes must first ensure there is an absolute certainty for a starting point of Philosophy. “If any particular truth about the world can survive this extreme skeptical challenge, then it must be truly indubitable and therefore a perfectly certain foundation for knowledge” (Kemerling). He sets up two arguments to show that one must doubt their senses. The first argument to doubt ones senses is laid out with regards to dreaming. Dreaming is so similar to being awake that are experiences may be false.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first is that since senses can be deceived, they cannot be trusted. He follows that a very realistic dream can be, in many cases, impossible to distinguish from what we perceive as reality (Withrington, Class Handout). Descartes’ dream argument is founded in this uncertainty, saying that “…there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep. The result is that I begin to feel dazed, and this very feeling only reinforces the notion that I may be asleep.” (Descartes 111). Descartes is admitting to a truth which is often overlooked. He proceeds to posit that, if one can believe that there is an all-good, all-powerful God that wouldn’t allow humans to be deceived, then there is also the possibility of the existence of a “malicious demon,” whose sole purpose would be to trick us into thinking that what we experience is real, but it would actually be a lie (Descartes 113). Furthermore, Descartes points out that it is possible to be fooled, not only in reality, but also in…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays