Mendel’s Law of Independence

Mendel’s Law of Independence- this is where Mendel discovered that two people having the same organisms will have their own independent assortment of organisms. This discovery was made after he had experimented with plants that had differences in traits in multiple ways. Assuming the genetics is passed f to the offspring random and independently of each other. There was much random pairing of subsequent pairing. The other hypothesis that Mendel mentioned, in the text was the dominate allele. In this hypothesis he discovered how to determine heritable traits. In my own words he discovered that we can have offspring of different traits however if there is dominance in the genes they will rule the gene.
The example for the laws of independence is if two genes were introduced they could provide genes that dominate. Like the puppies in the text, the dominating gene is the darker one so that one dominated the other genes.
Tempest, Great response! I agree that Mendel’s hypothesis are like bingo balls with the variety of heritable traits that are transferred between the genes that we are made of! Just because the parent may have the gene yet it is not visible is the gene transferable? Some of the genes that my grandmother had I now have and everyone said that I would be another! This is possible of the units of genes that make us each our own individual! Do you feel that he was experimenting just because or was he instinctually trying to find the answer to heritable traits?
Faisal, Great response! I agree that the discovery that Mandel made about the law of independence is very true! By experimenting with the plant seeds he discovered genes and the purpose of them. I understand that the pups born in the example will have the genetic makeup of the parents or their parents. Genes are genetic qualities passed down randomly, so do you think that an individual can produce an offspring of more distant relative?

The most common features of physical security begin with the wide use of the three D’s. Detect, deter, and deny access is the most used in the physical security field. Detect the individual who has breached security, deter the indivisible away from potential happenings; and then deny access of the particular environment or asset. Seeing how this is physical security the most commonly used are lighting systems, locks, and alarm systems, both because they serve as a distraction to the criminal. Lights allow the criminal little access and the alarm brings attention to the occurrence, 24 hours a day. I feel that the age of technology has exceled because most common used physical security is motion detected. Locks keep the crime from instantly happening. Intruders would have to break in if locks were used. However the least commonly used is the actual security guard and key locks. Reason being is that the age of technology is advancing and so is physical security.
Lyndi, Great response! I agree that locks serve the purpose of keeping immediate access limited. Do the changes of computerized locks affect the ability to keep control the physical security issues a business may have? The lights as a physical security purpose is one of the most used protections against crime because of the unavailability of the darkness and the individual getting caught. However I feel that the use of actual security guards is a thing of the past! Do you feel that the career of a plain security guard will soon fade do to the advancement in technology.

Jennifer, Great response! There are many extant features of physical security purposes however the one that works for one area may not for another. I find it very interesting that you mentioned motion detecting lights! The purpose of the motion is to alert the individual they are attempting to enter somewhere noticeable. So do you feel that in the near future the selection of motion detecting physical security will be a bigger demand? I would love to hear your opinion on the future of physical security.