Mentoring and Assessing
Critically examine the mentors accountability in their role as facilitators of learning and in the assessment of students competence.
Over the last decade the National Health Service (NHS) has continued its drive to optimise health outcomes, reduce health inequalities and conform to nationally agreed best practice in order to provide a more patient centred service. Accordingly, the present culture needed to adapt in a way as to encourage and strengthen clinical leadership and develop a workforce seeking to innovate and continuously improve through learning and research (Department of Health, 2005). Such a projected change within the health service has had a direct impact on nursing careers and nurse education both pre-registration and post-registration and has implications not only for those receiving education but also for those providing education. Through review of nursing education literature, this assignment intends to critically analyse the accountability of mentors in practice, looking at how their role as facilitators of learning and assessment is utilised within my own clinical setting, and how we, as nurses, assess a student’s competence. Furthermore discussions will focus around its impact on pre-registration students, identifying limitations mentors have in applying and reinforcing its importance in current practice.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC, 2008a:p19) define the term ‘Mentor’ as a registrant who has successfully completed an NMC approved mentor preparation programme and becomes responsible and accountable for organising and co-ordinating student learning activities in practice. This includes, supervising students in learning situations and providing constructive feedback, setting realistic learning outcomes and monitoring achievement, assessing total performance including skills, attitudes and behaviours as well as providing evidence and liaising with other colleagues if concerns are identified about the student’s achievement.
Over the last decade the National Health Service (NHS) has continued its drive to optimise health outcomes, reduce health inequalities and conform to nationally agreed best practice in order to provide a more patient centred service. Accordingly, the present culture needed to adapt in a way as to encourage and strengthen clinical leadership and develop a workforce seeking to innovate and continuously improve through learning and research (Department of Health, 2005). Such a projected change within the health service has had a direct impact on nursing careers and nurse education both pre-registration and post-registration and has implications not only for those receiving education but also for those providing education. Through review of nursing education literature, this assignment intends to critically analyse the accountability of mentors in practice, looking at how their role as facilitators of learning and assessment is utilised within my own clinical setting, and how we, as nurses, assess a student’s competence. Furthermore discussions will focus around its impact on pre-registration students, identifying limitations mentors have in applying and reinforcing its importance in current practice.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC, 2008a:p19) define the term ‘Mentor’ as a registrant who has successfully completed an NMC approved mentor preparation programme and becomes responsible and accountable for organising and co-ordinating student learning activities in practice. This includes, supervising students in learning situations and providing constructive feedback, setting realistic learning outcomes and monitoring achievement, assessing total performance including skills, attitudes and behaviours as well as providing evidence and liaising with other colleagues if concerns are identified about the student’s achievement.
References: Caldwell J, Dodd K, wilkes C (2008) Developing a Mentoring Model, Nursing Standard, 23 (7) pp 35-39 Cassidy S (2009), Interpretation of competence in a student assessment, Nursing Standard, 23, 18, 39 – 46 Department of Health (2004) Standards for better health, London, DOH Dolan G (2003) Assessing student nurse clinical competency: will we ever get it right? Journal of clinical Nursing; 12: 132-141 Freshwater D, Stickley T (2004), The heart of the art: emotional intelligence in nurse education, Nursing Inquiry, 11, 2, 91-98 Gopee Great Britain: Department of Health (2005) Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan, London, Department of Health Hand H (2006), Promoting effective teaching and learning in the clinical setting, Nursing Standard, 20, 39, 55-63 Honey P, Mumford A (1992), In Rassool G H, Rawaf S (2007) Learning style preferences of undergraduate nursing students. Nursing Standard. 21, 32, p35-41 Kolb D A (1985) The Learning Styles Inventory Technical Manual Levett-Jones, Tracy, Lathlean, Judith, McMillan, Margaret and Higgins, Isabel (2009) Staff - student relationships and their impact on nursing students’ belongingness and learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, (2), 316-324 Morton-Cooper A and Palmer A Oxford Dictionay (2011) Available from: htto://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m en gb0044610#m en gb0044610 (Accessed 6 July 2012) Phillip K, Spratt J (2007) A Synthesis of published research on mentoring and befriending Pulsford. D, Boit, K, Owen. S (2002) Are Mentors ready to make a difference? A survey of mentors attitudes towards nurse education, Nurse Education Today, 22 (6) pg 439-446 Quinn, FM, and Hughes, SJ (2007) Royal College of Nursing (2007) Guidance for mentors of nursing students and midwives: an RCN toolkit, 2nd edn, RCN, London Rust C (2002) Purposes and principles of assessment Rutkowski K (2007) Failure to fail: assessing nursing students’ competence during practice placements. Nursing Standard. 22, 13 35 – 40. Date of acceptance: September 28 2007. Wallace, B (2003) Practical issues of student assessment. Nursing Standard. 17 (31), 33-36.