Preview

Merchant of Venice and the Crucible Comparison Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1684 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Merchant of Venice and the Crucible Comparison Essay
Ashley Tam
Ms. Parker
ENG2DB – 01
December 17, 2010
Injustice: Power Gone Wrong All communities run successfully with qualities of fairness and equality. The well-being of the citizens depends on the support and guidance they receive from those with power and influence in their society. When the people become corrupt and start having intentions that do not contribute back to the community, the society will fall apart and be unable to maintain balance and stability. In William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible the reader sees examples of injustice inflicted on the victims within the plays through the people with power within the community. The Christians in The Merchant of Venice mock Shylock the Jew countless times while the high court in The Crucible believe citizens are practicing witchcraft without a proper testimony. In both situations, the Christians and the court see themselves doing the right thing and believe they are contributing to the society when in reality, they break apart the community by persecuting those that are different. The victims in William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible suffer from injustice as power being placed in the wrong hands leads to the formation of biased decision, the limited free will of citizens and severe punishments. The limited free will of the victims within the societies due to the manipulative mannerisms of the Christians and court subjects them to injustice. The way the Christians hate Shylock makes him have limited free will in the Venetian community. Shylock is unable to interact with the Christians due to his reputation as a moneylender. Shylock is unable to choose his occupation and as a moneylender, his only source of income is the interest he gains from it, resulting in the Christians hating him. This injustice forces him to be shunned from society and he ends up losing everything that he owns. The Jews only had moneylenders as their



Cited: Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: Penguin Books. 2003 Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Canada Inc., 1988

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Our adaptation of a scene in The Crucible by Arthur Miller is set during the Cultural Revolution in 1975 China. During this time, Mao Wanteu reasserted power by rooting capitalists; communism became the new religion. Potential communists were attacked and false allegations were made against them, resulting in jail, torture, or even execution. Similarly, in the Salem witch trials in The Crucible, women were accused of performing witchcraft by people who wanted to seek revenge or vengeance. Both time periods consist of false accusations that are made for deeper motives.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    works could be associated, one could associate any two works with a dead guy at…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play, “The Crucible”, written by Arthur Miller has a theme about reputation and respect. In the small town of Salem reputation is very important, especially important to the leaders of the town. They want to keep a good name, and the people also want to be good citizens. When people have a good reputation others give you more respect. When you have a good reputation in a small town, it's easier to get a fair hearing. However, when people started getting accused of witchcraft their reputation was destroyed. This made people more cautious of their own reputations. The characters in “The Crucible” John Proctor, Reverend Parris, and Judge Danforth all want to be known for something good to have a good reputation. All of the characters in “The Crucible” will make a bad choice in order to keep a good reputation.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible are two books about an illegal act that negatively affected a group of Puritans, during the 17th century. In The Scarlet Letter, the narrator tells a story about a woman who commits adultery with her lover and decides to live away from the other Puritans. In The Crucible, a man hides his sin from the Puritans in Boston, which ultimately leads to the Salem Witch Trials. Proctor and Dimmesdale are main characters in the books who face physical and mental problems, due to their hidden sin. Their choice to commit their sin is ultimately an unlawful act in the Puritan society that resulted in the suffering of their lovers and their tragic deaths.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People use comparison and contrast to notice the similarities and differences between different objects, subjects, texts, or possibly even ideas. Readers use a comparison analysis of books, or texts to better comprehend and connect texts to what they are really are about in and between the lines. In the history of American literature, Scarlet letter and Crucible by Nathaniel Hawthorne and Arthur Miller, can be compared in many different ways such as; the similar time setting, the puritan influence, as well as the roles of reputation.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Crucible", written by Arthur Miller, religious freedom and justice of the law are the main controversial aspects that are not enforced in this play. The Crucible is a play in which Arthur Miller writes about the tendentious, hysterical event of the Salem witch trials that occurred in Salem, Massachusetts during 1692. Miller writes "The Crucible" to show how inequitable and unjust the law can be in a time of fear and tension of the masses. In the play, inferior and subordinate people were accusing innocent citizens of witchcraft for revenge or land. The hysteria and fear in this time of the Salem witch trials influenced the law to become less dependable and accurate when Salem did not adhere to the basic American fundamentals of religious freedom and "innocent until proven guilty." Arthur Miller creates this play to show that we still as modern America are hurt by…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play “The Merchant of Venice” Shylock was the greedy and wealthy Jew, who was hated by everyone. Shylock’s occupation was to lend money to anyone who asked him to, but he put interests which no one could afford. This is one of the main reasons Shylock is hated, the other would be an obvious reason, he is a Jew and the rest of Venice consists of Christians (other than the Jewish community). Jews are known to be “money hungry”, greedy and selfish. Shylock gives no sympathy to anyone in any way, especially to his daughter Jessica. When he received the news that his…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible, a play by Arthur Miller, shows how intolerance can corrupt a theocratic society. In The Crucible, this is achieved by a combination of three chief contributors. The paradox mentioned in his introduction to Act I, was and is entirely true in regard to the conflicting nature of the theocratic system and the human condition. First and foremost, conformity and forced control destroy the sense of trust between villagers. Secondly, intolerant attitudes ruin all creative thought and new ideas, which could have possibly freed Salem from its twisted thinking. Finally the Puritans created the same form of oppressive government they ran away from England during the 1620s.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, is an intense, drama-filled play about the accusations of witchcraft amongst the town of Salem. Throughout this play, there are many themes that are laid out across all four acts. One of the mayor themes that sticks out and is present in all four acts is intolerance. In the Crucible there are countless times where intolerance is show by nearly every character involved in the play. This intolerance can be related to many events throughout American history and my own personal life.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ayn Rand once said “A single lie destroys a whole reputation of integrity. It means that a lie sadly has enough power to cause corruption in a society. It also suggests that a lie perhaps be strong enough to destroy even a high ranking person from a society. If you tolerate lies dominating people around you, you’ll eventually be a victim of them.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible Injustice

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rebelling against injustice is the duty that people need to do to bring justice. Bringing justice plays a huge part in The Crucible. The Crucible is a play about the Salem Witch Trials and how it started. One of the main reasons so many people hanged for witchcraft was the fear of authority. It is clear that the courts are unjust, but no one spoke out against it until the end of the play. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller expresses the theme of “Defiance becoming the duty of the people in the face of injustice” using characters of personal integrity.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible Essay

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Crucible takes place during one of the several dark periods of American history. In The Crucible, the justice system of the time was inaccurately portrayed. In Act III, Reverend Hale claims that he has signed seventy-two death warrants close to the end of the Salem Witch Trials: “Excellency, I have signed seventy-two death warrants; I am a minister of the Lord, and I dare not take a life without there be a proof so immaculate no slightest qualm of conscience may doubt it.”(Miller 92). This is not possible as the government setup could not possibly allow it. During the Salem Witch Trials a member of the clergy such as Revered Hale was not allowed to carry out the long arm of the law (judiciary action). The afflicted girls usually gave an indication of the guilt of the accused. The play usually claims that the girls passed out and gave no indicationof moving. In Act III, when Reverend Parris is interrogating Mary Warren in the case of Abigail Williams he has a request: But you did turn cold, did you not? I myself picked you up many times, and your skin were icy” (Miller 98). According to many court papers, the girls did not calmy pass out, they went through extreme convulsions, almost as if having a seizure. This is a second example of falsehood in the judicial system. A third example is the actual court system, according to the play there were only two judges: Danforth and Hathorne. In the introduction to Act III, the setting gives us information about who is presiding in the General Court: “Through the partitioning wall, we can hear a prosecutor’s voice, Judge Hawthorne’s” (Miller77). On the next page, the judge Danforth is then introduced to us as the next judge. In several court papers there were several mentioning of more than just two judges. The full panel of magistrates for the court were in fact named by the new charter, which arrived in Massachusetts on May 14, 1692 were William Stoughton, John Richards, Nathaniel Saltonstall,…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Crucible

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered if witches were actually real? In the play “The Crucible,” people thought they were real. In this story the mass hysteria that ensues is comparable to the Red Scare of the 1950s. In these similar conflicts people were scared of one another and falsely accused innocent people. We can learn something from these conflicts though. “The Crucible” has many events and themes that can apply to real life.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible Essay

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hysteria overshadowed logic and enabled the townspeople to think that their neighbors were acting out senseless and unbelievable crimes like dealing with the devil & murdering babies. In The Crucible, the townsfolk accepted and became active in the hysterical outbreak not only out of religious loyalty, but also because it gave them a chance to express repressed attitudes & to act on long-held grudges. The most obvious case was Abigail, who used the circumstances to call out Elizabeth Proctor of witchcraft and have her sent to jail. However, many others used the hysteria to their advantage as well. Reverend Parris strengthened his position within the village, no matter how brief, by making scapegoats of people like John Proctor who questioned his authority. The wealthy & ambitious Thomas Putnam gained revenge on Francis Nurse by convicting Rebecca, Francis’s wife, of the uncanny deaths of Ann Putnam’s babies. In the end, hysteria thrived only because people benefited from it. It postponed the principles of daily life and allowed the acting out of every dark motive & hateful urge under the pretense of justice. The witch trials were central to the action of The Crucible, & dramatic accusations/ confessions filled the play even beyond the confines of the courtroom. In the first act, even before the hysteria began, we saw Parris accuse Abigail of dishonoring him, and he then made a series of accusations against his parishioners. Giles Corey and Proctor responded in turn, & Putnam soon joined in, creating chaos even before Reverend Hale entered the scene. The entire witch trial system thrived on accusations along with hysteria. Proctor attempted to break the cycle with a confession of his own, when he admits to the affair with Abigail, but his confession is beat by the accusation of the act of dealing with the devil against him, which in turn demanded a confession. Proctor’s decision at the end of the play to die rather than confess to a sin that he…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Shakespeare’s perspective on justice in The Merchant of Venice it must be clear that they were in the reign of Elizabeth I. During this particular time Jewish people were hated and the Christians believed that they were superior. Shakespeare considered there to be a difference between law and justice, he shows that if the law is blindly applied without the Christian idea of mercy and fairness, the pursuer will fall.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays