Preview

Merck and Vioxx

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Merck and Vioxx
Assignment 3 – Class 3

Table of Contents
Question 4, page 313 3
Question 5, page 313 4
Question 10, page 315 4
Question 2, page 357 5
Question 6, page 358 5
References 6

Assignment 3 – Class 3
# 4, page 313 – Merck & Vioxx
According to The New York Times article, “Merck to Pay $950 Million Over Vioxx” by Duff Wilson, the following lawsuits have been settled by Merck: Merck has agreed to pay $950 million and has pleaded guilty to a criminal charge over the marketing and sales of the painkiller Vioxx, the company and the Justice Department said Tuesday. Merck agreed to pay a $321 million criminal fine and plead guilty to one misdemeanor count of illegally introducing a drug into interstate commerce, the Justice Department said in a news release. The charge arose from Merck 's promotion of Vioxx to treat rheumatoid arthritis before the Food and Drug Administration approved it for that purpose in 2002. Merck also is paying $426 million to the federal government and $202 million to state Medicaid agencies. Those payments will settle civil claims that its illegal marketing caused doctors to prescribe and bill the government for Vioxx they otherwise would not have prescribed. In 2007, Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle 27,000 lawsuits by people who had claimed they or their relatives had suffered injury or death after taking the drug. Merck has also signed a corporate integrity agreement in connection with the settlement, promising to monitor future promotional activity and report back regularly to the government. Merck joins Pfizer and most other major drug companies in settling long investigations with prosecutors.
In April 2010, the Philadelphia Inquirer issued an article titled, “High court rules with investors in lawsuit against Merck,” discussing the lawsuit against Merck by their investors stating that Merck downplayed the risks involved of Vioxx, which ultimately cost them billions of dollars in stock value after the drug was removed



References: WILSON, By DUFF. (November 23, 2011 Wednesday). Merck to Pay $950 Million Over Vioxx. The New York Times, Retrieved from www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic. (April 28, 2010 Wednesday). High court rules with investors in lawsuit against Merck. The Philadelphia Inquirer, Retrieved from www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Harris, Gardiner. “Pfizer Pays $2.3 Billion to Settle Marketing Case” NY Times. September 2, 20009.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck and Vioxx

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In May of 1999, the FDA approved the use of rofecoxib. Marketed under the name of Vioxx, rofecoxib was manufactured and distributed by Merck, a large pharmaceutical company. Doctors prescribed the drug as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and prescription painkiller. Five years after its release, rofecoxib was withdrawn because of a study that showed the drug more than doubled the risk of heart attack or stroke. Because of Merck’s ongoing and increasing knowledge of the dangerous effects of the drug while continuing to distribute rofecoxib, Merck should be held accountable for acting unethically.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actions Merck undertook when marketing Vioxx and emphasizing its safety even after finding out the product’s side effects endangered all its key stakeholders and showed the real face of the company that accented its highly ethical maxims. Cardiovascular side effects of the Vioxx increased the risk of complications that could have caused patient’s death, therefore Merck violated the basic right to life of all the Vioxx consumers. It was already mentioned that Vioxx caused 3468 deaths by heart attack and stroke. All these tragedy events could have been prevented if Merck provided adequate information about all the peculiarities of Vioxx. Even though Merck argued that the withdrawal of tests results was caused by its utilitarian intention…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pfizer has been involved in numerous litigations, which resulted in two things: damaged reputation and enormous payouts. The two biggest litigations concerned the pain killer Bextra and related off-label promotions and illegal drug testing on seriously ill children in Nigeria during a meningitis epidemic. The first was settled in 2008 by paying $2.3 billion in charges and the latter involved paying a fine of $75 million in April 2009. The discontinued projects reflect a loss of resources and also in the perceived inability to complete research projects. From September 2008…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1995 Douglas Durand went to work for Tap Pharmaceuticals as vice- president of sales. Several months after starting at Tap Pharmaceuticals, Durand was in disbelief to find out that the company was bribing urologists to purchase the new Lupron drug for prostate cancer. Durand found the culture at Tap Pharmaceuticals to be in misalignment. In order for Durand to protect his good name, he began to document all his findings over a 6 year period and submitting the information to federal prosecutors. The documentation that Durand submitted to the federal prosecutors was so overwhelming that it caused Tap Pharmaceuticals to plead guilty to conspiring with doctors and cheating the government. As result of the guilty plead, Tap Pharmaceuticals paid…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, several studies have questioned the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx. The manufacture of Vioxx has announced a voluntary withdrawal of the drug from the U.S. and worldwide market in September 30, 2004. After the company’s own 3 year study was stopped. Two million Americans were taking Vioxx when it was pulled and Merck had said that approximately 20 million people in the U.S. have used the drug. This withdrawal was due to some safety concerns of an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes in patients taking Vioxx during the first 18 months. In the 5 years that Vioxx was on the market over 88,000 and 140,000 cases of heart disease were reported, of those cases 30 to 40 percent were fatal. The records indicate that the action of both Merck and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found nearly 30,000 excess cases of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths that resulted from the use of this drug between 1999 and 2003. Over 300 lawsuits have been filed against Merck, and was expected that thousand more will…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Res 351 week 2

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Merck & Co. marketed a drug called Vioxx. The drug was said to have less gastrointestinal problems than its competition – Naproxen. However, Vioxx had considerably more side effects including; heart attacks and strokes (Vershoor,C.C, 2006). Merck and Co. were accused of several unethical acts, therefore, the drugs were pulled from the market in September 2004. Unfortunately, not before 100 million prescriptions were filled. Merck & Co. was also accused of misrepresenting or concealing of study results to doctors. The New England Journal of Medicine reported that previous studies of three patients had been withheld. All three patients suffered heart attacks when taking Vioxx. Sales reps for Merck & Co. were trained to use subliminal selling tactics. Additionally, Merck & Co. only chose biased speakers of their products at educational…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bristol Myers

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis seek a settlement rather than let the patent infringement case go to trial because Bristol-Myers Squibb fail to disclose the oral side deal with Apotex and its false certification to the FTC. Going to trial would have cost Bristol-Myers a great deal of money and severe penalties from the FTC. Bristol-Myers knew before hand that the FTC opposes agreements that restricted the introduction of generic drugs which could be anti-competitive. Bristol- Myers was hoping that it could have pursued a settlement with Apotex subjected to FTC approval and delay the launch of Apotex generic drug until its patent expire.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    15 marks • Attempt Question 2 • Allow about 40 minutes for this section Section III Pages 9–10…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Homework

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think with the aspect of economics the company has done the right thing as far as design great drugs in the past, and often even took losses with the making and delivery of those drugs. When it comes to Vioxx, I tend to believe that they should have informed the public and the doctors prescribing and taking this drug with all their findings and notions before the hard evidence came about. I do believe that not telling the whole truth about their findings to the doctors and the pubic goes against my belief in ethics. If I had anything to do with the distribution of the drug before the 2004 removal from market, I would have really studied the reports and warnings, and if I saw what was being reported and said from the scientist, then I would have stopped the sale of it then, and not wait until 2004. I would then have made a public address and told the public and doctors why we are stopping the sale and production of this drug. This would have again put more faith into the company from the public view as well. This is a hard question because if we look at the tobacco companies, they are still selling tobacco that has been proven over and over again to be harmful to humans and animals. I am a smoker and hopefully one day will quit, but for a company to continue to produce and sell a known harmful and deadly product, this is ethically bad for them as well as our government to even allow it. Where is the ethics in all of this? I will never figure that one out.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dcpa Pros And Cons

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before the long-term safety of a drug is known, it is often already being presented to the public. Also, FDA clinical trials that are required for product approval characteristically are not constructed to identify rare and adverse effects. Take Vioxx for instance. Vioxx was a heavily promoted drug in the late 1990s and early 2000s. With over $100 million spent in advertising by Merck, the drug raked in over $1 billion annually. Asking for Vioxx, thinking it was a superior medication, patients were not aware that the drug could lead to heart attacks…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LEG 500

    • 1991 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pharmaceutical Company Forced to Pay $3 Billion Over Faking Research, Bribing Doctors | Health Impact News. [ONLINE] Available at http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/pharmaceutical-company-forced-to-pay-3-billion-over-faking-research-bribing-doctors/. [Accessed 15 August 2014].…

    • 1991 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brain Gym Analysis

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Drug companies distribute and promote their changed results in academic journals, tricking very nearly anybody into putting their dangerous and inaccurately tested drugs on the market. In duplicate publication if a drug company gets a better result, they will republish their findings in slightly different ways and in multiple academic sources. “One drug called ondansetron managed to overestimate the drug's effect by 23% using this method” (Goldacre, 2011, pp.164-165). Side effects usually happen and can often be severe. Harmful side effects and their negative results, when known, can discourage medicine buyers. Drug companies can muffle the negative reactions by contrasting them with horrible symptoms that another, comparative medication may have. According to drugwatch.com, one type 2 diabetes drug, Actos, which was prescribed 10 million times and FDA approved, increases the chance of bladder cancer by 40% and causes an increased risk of heart failure. Vioxx a painkiller that was approved in 1999 by the FDA was studied in a trial against an older drug, naproxen, to compare the different side effects much money was invested in the trial, and the pending…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    english

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    H I G H E R S C H O O L C E R T I F I C AT E…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Case

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This should be maintained for this deal as well. Hence the most Merck could pay as licensing fee is = 37.84%…

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays