Meursault During The Trial Essay

Evaluate the justice that was given to Meursault during the trial. Justice has been surely an essential issue for the human being since ever and throughout history justice has been considered and tried to put it into effect. In the same way, punishments for violating the justice have been employed as well in order to conserve peace or pay righteously before the people. Within the punishments, capital penalty has been judgment method adopted by many ancient people. In his book “Old Sparky” Anthony Galvin states: “The Code of Hammurabi was one of the earliest recorded legal system. It come from Babylon around 1772 BC” (7). This shows that justice and judgment has been a common requirement for people, especially if there is a case of murder or any grievance. Yet, is justice worth and necessary? Absolutely yes. The reason is that many human beings tend to
During the trial, while the prosecutor was accusing him he seems not to be clear that he has committed a terrible crime. Meursault expresses: “I couldn’t help admitting that he was right, I didn’t feel much remorse for what I’d done” (100). In this occasion, besides of the crime itself, I infer that Meursault might shoot many other people if they invade his territory in a stressing moment. He had nothing specific against the man, however a meaningless and little situation was enough to manifest the fruit of the egotism and careless. Psychological problem? Well, he was a normal person apparently. The point is that the man is responsible of his acts and justice is just, and without it many people who misestimate others are walking on the streets; some of them overwhelmed by an intensive afternoon sun and decided to kill a neighbor, or my family. But although justice may not be a physical shield to avoid a disgrace, it can be an example or an admonition to people to at least think twice before doing something