Preview

Mexican-American Civil War: Sam Houston

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
819 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mexican-American Civil War: Sam Houston
Sam houston and santa anna, but mainly Sam Houston

Santa Anna might be looked at like an evil menace in Texas, but in Mexico Santa Anna is looked at like a hero. Santa Anna was also the head of the government on 11 different occasions. He also had the nickname “Napoleon of the West”.The choices made by Sam Houston, Santa Anna, David Crockett, James Bowie, and William B. Travis, determined who would win this war. Sam Houston was born on March 2, 1793 near Lexington, Virginia. From 1813 to 1814 he fought in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend and was wounded. He was elected to Congress in 1823 and 1825. In 1827, he became Tennessee's governor. He was made the first president of the Republic of Texas in 1836 and was re-elected in 1841. From 1849
…show more content…
People from Mexico wanted the Nigerian River to be the border, and the U.S wanted the Rio Grande to be the border of the state. Sam Houston came up with the idea that if he went past the Nigerian River and the Mexicans attacked, then Mexico would attack on U.S soil. They did just that, and like that the war had begun. The very first battles were The Battle of Palo Alto, and the Battle of Resaca de la Palma, which the U.S won. Another motivation was the possibility of riches and both countries wouldn’t want to give that up considering that they were dealing with bad economies. This subject impacted society by making a rally cry for Texans “Remember the Alamo”, for instance was one of those cries. Another negative factor was the cost of human lives that was deeply felt by the survivors for many years more than 5,800 Americans were killed or wounded in battle, and 11,000 soldiers died from diseases, in addition to others who succumbed from their war injuries soon after being mustered out of service. The enormous financial cost, estimated at more than $75 million, was another negative factor. Many Mexican Generals also forced peasants into the army for benefit of the …show more content…
A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2016.

"The Aftermath of War." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2016.

Bio.com. A&E Networks Television, n.d. Web. 23 Feb. 2016.

"The 1836 Battle." The Official Alamo Website. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Feb.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The end result of the US-Mexico war was the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which set the border at the Rio Grande River.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Mexican-American War, he raised and commanded a company and joined the Fourth Regiment, Illinois Volunteer Infantry. Harris was subsequently elected major of the regiment. Whilst absent and with the US Army, Harris was elected a member of the State senate in 1846. He was presented with a sword by the State of Illinois for gallantry at the Battle of Cerro Gordo, Mexico. And that's what I realized about…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Randolph B. Campbell’s biography, Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Campbell argues Houston “was courageous, sensible, and practical” (Campbel xii). Campbell believes Houston shaped not only Texas history, but the United States growth and the “possibilities and limitations of leadership in a democratic society”(Campbell xii). Campbell states Houston proves his impact on history by how he overcame the many problems he faced and his physical and moral courageous way of handling them; However, Sam Houston was a good leader not because he was brave, but because he never took a risk he did not have to take.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the War of 1812 broke out Sam did not volunteer to join, he instead wanted to study mathematic but in 1813 he decided against a teaching career and joined the 7th US Infantry where he quickly became third…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Santa Anna's army was on their way to kill Sam Houston and his army but Sam Houston had found a great area to have the battle that provided hidden cover for him and his army while Santa Anna was in the middle of an open field and got surprise attacked. Sam and his army won the battle ended in 18min, Sam and his army won the battle that lasted 18 minutes. After the battle ended his army couldn’t find Santa Anna but later had found Santa Anna dressed as a peasant and was captured and brought to Sam. After arguing about whether to kill Santa Anna or not, Sam said “‘You want to settle for blood, but I’ll settle for Texas’” because all the soldiers said Santa Anna should be hung (which in my opinion he should have been hung after he signed Texas over to Sam Houston anyway for killing all the soldiers at the alamo), but even though Sam Houston didn’t kill Santa Anna like he should have, he still fought to earn Texas to be freed from Mexico, and also fought to finish the fight the Alamo had started but…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 2, 1836, Texas had become an independent nation from Mexico. It had named itself the Republic of Texas and proudly stood between a growing United States, and a conflicted Mexico. Immediately facing problems, Texas had many economic failures, had trouble with nearby Indians, and could not form a stable military. It is for these reasons that Sam Houston, a major political figure and President of the Republic of Texas, decided that Texas could not sustain itself as an independent nation. Sam Houston suggested to the United States to annex Texas. This caused a bit of disruption in the United States, as people who opposed Texas annexation and people who wanted Texas annexation clashed. Many people thought…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sam Houston was a great man in our history. He stood up for what he believed was good for the Union not the North or the South. When Sam was rebuked for providing the winning margin for his opponents he said "I know neither North nor South; I know only the Union." He also said everyone "…must stand firm to the Union, regardless of all personal consequences." He was fiercely ambitious, yet at the end he sacrificed for principle all he had ever won or wanted. He was a Southerner, and yet he steadfastly maintained his loyalty to the Union. He could be all things to all men—and yet, when faced with his greatest challenge, he was faithful to himself and to Texas.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexico Dbq Analysis

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most people would say that the U.S was not justified in going to war with Mexico because they were uninvited and basically attacked Mexico, however they were justified because they had real political reasons to do so. Frontier land created better opportunities for commerce (Document E). Commerce of course, was a big thing for most people in the U.S, which is a reason the U.S wanted to move into this uncharted territory. Individual self-advancement was also a reason that the U.S wanted to move into Texas. This helped people make themselves better in a way, it helped promote themselves for the better. All of this promoted economic growth, which was a good motivation to…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cause of the battle started when Mexicans won their independence from Spain and founded the Mexican Republic in 1821. Texas could…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sam Houston was born from Scottish-Irish decent. His forefathers were immigrants that had settled in Pennsylvania and migrated south towards Virginia. Houston’s grandfather, John Houston, established the successful Timber Ridge plantation and his father, Samuel Houston, was a member of the revolutionary army, attaining the rank of major. Sam Houston was born in 1793 the middle child of eight siblings. Sam’s father military service took its toll on the Houston’s plantation causing it to be neglected, and in 1806 the plantation went bankrupt. Sam’s father sold Timber Ridge and the moved west to Tennessee. Samuel Huston did not survive the trip and passed away during the traveling. The rest of Houston family made the move. Tennessee was frontier country, but had been settled for over a decade.…

    • 3817 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    About 200 years ago the United Stated had a border between the north and the south, which separated states slave and non slave states. In 1820, the United States had an equal number of slave states and free states, but around that time the north did not want slavery in their country so the started the civil war. During the civil war, many acts were made like the Kansas-Nebraska act. The civil war ended with almost one fifth of the soldiers dying and many were wounded. Why did Texans fight? Texans fought in the Civil War because they had a immense love for Texas, wanted state rights, and most importantly to preserve slavery.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas is a majesty of her own, rich in history and events that shaped its development into the state that it is today. Starting from its settlement of anglo-americans throughout 1821-1835, under the government of Mexico, to the annexation of Texas into the united states in 1845, and the modern Texas we live in today. The heritage, traditions and culture of tejanos remain in many parts of Texas as well as the historical preservation of places, artifacts, documents, and influential leaders who helped shape Texas. Among those who have had a big impact on the development of Texas is Sam Houston, Commander of the Texas army, during the fight for Texas independence from Mexico. Sam Houston was a very important political figure and the first elected president of the Republic of Texas in 1836.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should states be able to fight when they need to? About 65,000 Texans served in the Confederate military because they wanted their own rights. Texans were happy with the Kansas-Nebraska Act because you could vote whether you wanted slavery or not. After Abraham Lincoln became president (Anti slavery) a number of southern states left the Union so Texas decided to secede. A month after Texas left the Civil War began. Why did Texans fight in the Civil War? They fought because they loved their state, they wanted to preserve slavery and they fought for their state rights.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American war was a border dispute due to Texas. Texas had declared independence from Mexico since 1836. Mexico thought the boundary line was “...the Sabine River, which separated Louisiana and Texas (Pg.6 Johannsen).” The U.S claimed the line was “...the Rio Grande, the "traditional" line claimed in the 1803 treaty with France, which suggested that Texas was a part of the Louisiana Purchase, and confirmed by John Quincy Adams in his 1819 negotiations with Spain (Pg.6 Johannsen).” The purpose of the war was to decide how the annexation of Texas was going to happen by deciding where the boundary line should be.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics