One of the …show more content…
In both conflicts, they constructed the elemental focuses of the causes for which many fought for. A clear example is the parties’ spokesmen and generals, like Patrick Henry, taking part in the American Revolution, and Emiliano Zapata, mainly regarded in the Mexican Revolution, built the principles and representations of their moral beliefs. Singling them out and analyzing their phrases can show just how much of they were willing to advocate in order to succeed with their cause. In the American’s case, Patrick Henry said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” announcing a very vivid take on his idea of freedom and challenging established principles. In the Mexican’s case Emiliano Zapata stood by his saying “I want die a slave of principles, not men.” which mostly coincides with the previous statement. Almost instantaneously signs of similarity can be identified, both statements contain the same basis and form of expression towards their situation and incite a certain type of behavior of the recipient. Plainly seen here, occasionally there is a point that is not totally devoted to the idea of difference, which not only shows ideal diversification, but also keeps intriguing thoughts on the subject …show more content…
Some Americans, if not most, have not remained with many hurtful practices from Revolutionary times, and have taken the foundation of the government to create a global power. Although this is true for Americans, unfortunately it is not for Mexicans, for the country itself has not seen its fullest potential being carried out thoroughly in the many years it has had to recover. Ethically hazardous practices are also prevalent today in Mexico, such as political theft due to law enforcement loopholes or even contract killing. In the time compared, these two countries and their wars have definitely had their fair share of distinctions, yet one must remember that, in a philosophical perspective “all that is unique, has something to offer to the