Preview

Michael Furlong Murder Case Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michael Furlong Murder Case Essay
Goodmorning/afternoon Mr Doherty and Miss Dundas. The case of the murder of Michael Furlong is most certainly a controversial case. On the 3rd of June 2002 Furlong was shopping at a hardware store in Smithfield and as he left the store, Michael Sorrell, a chronic paranoid schizophrenic approached Furlong, slit his throat 3 times with a knife and then chased the victims brother who was shopping with Furlong at the time. Later that day he was apprehended asleep in his vehicle with a large hunting knife, presumably the knife with which the offence was committed. Sorrell was also in possession of the victims wallet which enabled the police to link him to the offence. He was then held in custody by police until the trial 4 days later.

There are a number of issues raised by this case such as how the criminal justice system deals with people with mental illness. Sorrell pleaded not guilty as at the time of the act was suffering from a mental illness and not responsible by law in killing the deceased. in the Supreme Court of NSW 7th February 2003 was found not guilty of murder on the grounds that he was mentally ill when he committed the crime and was ordered to be detained in place of strict security as well as monitoring his mental health.
…show more content…
Besides showing that the person committed the unlawful act (Actus reus), a mental component must too be satisfied. The mental component is referred to as the mens rea, meaning “intention to do wrong”. This intention must be established for most findings of criminal responsibility. The importance of mens rea is obvious. If an accused person is suffering from a mental disorder which deprives them of reason and understanding, the mens rea necessary for criminal responsibility may be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philcox V. King

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr King appealed the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia’s decision for him to be liable to pay Ryan Philcox damages for mental harm on two grounds. The first is that he did not owe Ryan Philcox a duty of care and the second that as Ryan Philcox was not present at the scene of the accident when the accident occurred, he did not satisfy the condition imposed by s 53(1)(a) of the Civil Liability Act (SA) upon recovery of damages for mental harm by someone other than a parent, spouse or child of a person killed, injured or endangered in an accident. The issues that arise for the purposes of this appeal are that if Mr King owed Ryan Philcox duty of care, his negligent driving breached it and that if the duty of care existed and was…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Essay

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Decision made by a Nevada parole board to free Simpson after NFL star apologized for his part in 2007 robbery…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Guzha

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus reus is the physical element of a crime .It can be the physical element of a crime. It can be an act or a failure to act (an omission) or a state of affairs. In most cases the actus reus will be something the defendant does, but there are situations in which failure to act is sufficient for the actus reus. These are set out at section 2.2 ‘ state of affairs’ cases are very rare.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Despite the notion of popular literature and television that the "insanity defense" is an automatic bye for committing heinous crimes, or even crimes of any sort, forensic psychologists are faced with the task of evaluating the validity of the claim as well as applying the legal standards and precedents when asked to testify regarding competency to stand trial. Making the determination requires evaluating the defendant 's mental state according to the provisos of the DSM-IV as well as integrating the law. This can be particularly difficult because psychology remains a rapidly evolving field and the law can be somewhat resistant to change. The question this paper seeks to answer is whether one can actively participate in his own defense if he has some form of amnesia. As a part of the answer, the author will look at the evolving role of amnesia in the diagnosis of mental illness including the changes that took place with the…

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    OJ Simpson Essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The O.J Simpson case has been an extremely popular topic over the last few years in America. It depicted a great example of domestic violence and shinned a light on the grave danger of when women don’t speak up. Domestic violence is extremely popular in the United States and 3.3 to 10 million women suffer every year. O.J Simpson was let off the hook, essentially, for the murder of his wife and Ronald Goldman. Too many men walk away without justice for the act of violence towards their spouse. Abuse is no joke and the issue of spouse abuse in America needs to be taken into more importance.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mens Rea – refers to criminal intent. In other words, what was a defendant was thinking and what was their intent when the crime was committed. It helps the criminal justice system determine between someone who did not mean to commit an act to those who set out to commit a crime.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Actus Reus and Mens Rea

    • 327 Words
    • 1 Page

    the elements that constitue mens rea, namely: 1. The accused knew what they were doing 2. They knew what they were doing was wrong (legally) 3. They were in sound mind to choose whether or not to do it 4. They chose to do it anyway. If any of these 4 are not present, then mens rea is not complete, and the person can be found not guilty (including pleading insanity).…

    • 327 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Media Law

    • 3287 Words
    • 14 Pages

    “Simon ‘Slasher’ Stevens, as he is known to friends and associates, has been appearing on indictment today at Thistletoun Sheriff Court for a serious assault with an offensive weapon and extortion. The assault relates to an incident that took place in Thistletoun Shopping Centre last September during which Senga McGlumpher, who gave evidence earlier in the trial, was knocked to the ground and threatened. Stevens denies involvement and claims that he was at a pawnbroker in Glasgow with one of his associates, Oliver Harvey, at the time of the incident. Harvey, giving evidence on this the third day of the trial, confirmed Stevens’s version of events. However, like Stevens, Harvey has a number of convictions for violent crime. Indeed, it was apparent from Harvey’s evidence that he was not telling the truth. After viewing some CCTV footage from a local shop, I can confirm Stevens was in the vicinity at the time of the incident. Therefore, it should not take the prosecution too long to establish Stevens’s involvement. Having spoken to one of the jurors, it is clear that they have already formed the view that Stevens is guilty. The trial is set to resume next Monday.”…

    • 3287 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A person cannot usually be found guilty of a criminal offence unless two elements are present: an actus reus, Latin for guilty act; and mens rea, Latin for guilty mind. Both these terms actually refer to more than just moral guilt, and each has a very specific meaning, which varies according to the crime, but the important thing to remember is that to be guilty of an offence, an accused must not only have behaved in a particular way, but must also usually have had a particular mental attitude to that behavior. The exception to this rule is a small group of offences known as crimes of strict liability.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kidnapping Case Study

    • 5451 Words
    • 22 Pages

    An indictable offence is a serious criminal offence that allows the accused or defendant to be tried before a judge and jury. A defendant/accused is the party or person charged with a criminal offence. A prosecutor is the party in a criminal trial who presents the case against the offender. The prosecutor is appointed by the Director of Public Prosecutions to work on a particular case, but is not necessarily a fulltime employee of the DPP.…

    • 5451 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In criminal law it is the basic principle that a crime consists of a mental element and a physical element. A person's awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal is the mental element, and ‘actus reus' (the act itself) is the physical element.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law: Notes

    • 7508 Words
    • 31 Pages

     Mens Rea and Actus Reus are necessary for a crime; apart from in strict liability…

    • 7508 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    law- mens rea

    • 1166 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Intention is the highest form of mens rea and has two types, direct and oblique. Direct intent is where the D’s aim, objective and purpose to being about the consequence, this is set out in R v Mohan, often referred to as purpose intent. It is D’s Aim, Objective and Purpose to bring about the prohibited consequence. If however the prosecution can not prove direct intent and the crime is a specific intent crime (ie. A crime in which intention must be proved) then they will try to prove oblique intent instead.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime

    • 14988 Words
    • 60 Pages

    Mens rea: refers to the mental state of the accused; i.e. that the accused intended the actions.…

    • 14988 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Good Essays