There are a number of issues raised by this case such as how the criminal justice system deals with people with mental illness. Sorrell pleaded not guilty as at the time of the act was suffering from a mental illness and not responsible by law in killing the deceased. in the Supreme Court of NSW 7th February 2003 was found not guilty of murder on the grounds that he was mentally ill when he committed the crime and was ordered to be detained in place of strict security as well as monitoring his mental health. …show more content…
Besides showing that the person committed the unlawful act (Actus reus), a mental component must too be satisfied. The mental component is referred to as the mens rea, meaning “intention to do wrong”. This intention must be established for most findings of criminal responsibility. The importance of mens rea is obvious. If an accused person is suffering from a mental disorder which deprives them of reason and understanding, the mens rea necessary for criminal responsibility may be