Preview

Michael Shaara's Goal In 'The Killer Angels'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michael Shaara's Goal In 'The Killer Angels'
Ahmed Farooq Summer Assignment
Mr. Premliser American History
The Killer Angels
Michael Shaara’s goal in writing The Killer Angels was to write about the men of the Civil War, not the war itself. A take on the war from the inside out, opposed to outside in. Shaara was able to show that there was no good vs. bad, there was just men who had dreams, and the will to fight for their homeland.
One way that Shaara shows that there were no bad side in the war was through the portrayal of confederate general Robert E. Lee. The book portrayed the general as an intellectual whose opinion of slavery was not of a supporter or of an opponent. In fact, the primary reason for Lee’s decision to lead the confederate army was his selfish


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Gettysburg brought the dueling North and South together to the small town of Gettysburg and on the threshold of splitting the Union. Gettysburg was as close as the United States got to Armageddon and The Killer Angels gives the full day-to-day account of the battle that shaped America's future. Michael Shaara tells the story of the Battle of Gettysburg through the eyes of the generals and men involved in the action of the battle. The historical account of the Battle of Gettysburg gives the reader a chance to experience the battle personally and not the history book manner taught in schools. A historical novel gives the facts straightforward and provides no commentary by the people involved in history. The historical account of the Battle of Gettysburg, as seen in Killer Angels, provides the facts of the battle as seen through the eyes of Generals Robert E. Lee, Joshua Chamberlain, James Longstreet, and John Buford. The feelings and inner-thoughts of each General and the conditions of the battle are seen, heard, and felt by the reader in the historical account. Shaara takes historical license with letters, the words of the men, and documents written during the three hellish days of the battle. Shaara avoids historical opinion and provides his own opinion towards the Civil War and the people. The historical account of the Civil War, the Battle of Gettysburg specifically, in Killer Angels conveys the attitude to toward war, attitude towards the Civil War, and cause for fighting the war of General Robert E. Lee, Joshua Chamberlain, James Longstreet, and John Buford.…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This first entry into the book showcases the side of the southern Confederate armies, who were comparing the Civil War to the Revolutionary War. They saw their enemies, the Northern Yankees, as nothing more than tyrants trying to oppress the south. Just as the British had done to the colonists a century and a half ago. This gave them a "holy cause of southern freedom", a reason to step into the shoes of their famed forefathers and once again fight for their liberties and constitutional rights.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Jefferson Davis was the ember, then it was Edward Pollard that provided the wind to start the firestorm in constructing this image of the South with his books The Lost Cause and The Lost Cause Regained. Pollard championed the idea of the South fighting for states’ rights, slavery was not cruel, and the South fought against great odds. Pollard, in his attempt to write history, stated “The Union was nothing more than convenience of the States, and had no mission apart from them.” Pollard saw the political division line between the North and South to be coincidental that this line separated slave holding states and non-slave holding states. Pollard paints the Confederate army as “ragged and poorly-equipped.” This was to contrast the Confederate…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Northerners and southerners have been belligerent against each other, this was called the Civil War. The confederates had a leader named Ulysses S. Grant, when the confederates had no hope Grant was determined, he didn’t want to lose the Civil War. Robert E. Lee was also a leader of the Confederates, he had an abundant amount of part in the war. General Lee tried everything so his side of the war could win. General Ambrose Burnside thought if the plans that nobody else have thought of that’s how the Union had won the Civil War, he thought outside of the box.…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Document 3 the rebels of the south were at least trying to fight back but Lee is just giving up and resigning while the confederates need him it is a rather selfish act..…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Opposition was felt by both the north and south. In the North, the opposers felt the Southerners possessed the right to be independency and felt the war affected them negatively. In the South, the opposers did not want a war or a Union advance on the newly declared Confederacy. All the opposers didn’t see a positive side to having the war. Both side also had people that just wanted peace between the sides.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaara asserts that the war would not have ended in defeat for the Confederacy if Robert E. Lee had listened to James Longstreet. Longstreet repeatedly suggests to Lee to move the troops around to the right and loop back behind the Union army to cut them off from Washington and attack from there. Lee refuses, turning down Longstreet each time. He will not listen to reason. Thinking that his way is the only way and no one knows better than him, Lee decides to make a full-frontal attack on the Union forces. Lee thinks that marching forward out in the open across a vast field heading straight into the frontward direction of the Union army will work. Longstreet points out that Union artillery will surely destroy most of the rebel troops before they even make it to where the Union lines are, and that when they do get there, there won’t be enough men left to put up a hardy enough fight to possibly win. He strongly feels that the Confederacy should move to the right since there was room in the west to get around them and attack them from behind. Apparently, Lee denies his theory. As I was reading, I was very satisfied with Shaara’s portrayal of the Union views of slavery: Chamberlain’s encounter with the black man. When Chamberlain’s soldiers discovered a sleeping black man and Chamberlain went to see him, he treated the man with the same respect as he gave his own men. Here you can…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is a common belief among many historians that history is told through the eyes of the winners. Read any American history book or any world history textbook and they mainly tell you about the hero that saved the nation such as Wellington at Waterloo or General Washington in the Revolutionary War or General Patton in World War II. The case of the American Civil War is no different, especially for a man who changed the war. Ask anybody in the south, even the kindergartners and they will tell you about William Tecumseh Sherman, the man who burned everything. Ask anyone in the North and they’ll tell you how Sherman and Grant together helped the North win the war. General William Tecumseh Sherman constantly said that he disliked war yet when his time came in the Civil War he rose up from a man who was dubbed crazy to become a man who changed war into a concept of total war and would go on to become one of…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the events of world history, the Civil War in the USA is one of the central places. Due to this sombre and mourning event, the current population know the names of Abraham Lincoln, John Brown, Ulysses S. Grant, who stood at the head of armies of the northerners; know the names of General Robert E. Lee, who led the armed forces of the slave owners, fanatic Lincoln's assassin named John Wilkes Booth. It is known, how the war ended and who won it. This creates an extremely dramatic history of this war. It is associated with not only the names of the characters, personifying two warring camps, but many battles, sea battles, the most urgent political debate, skillful diplomatic game, and the Union Confederation (during the war, the North and South of the USA were called). It was seeking to obtain the support of the European powers (South) or, on the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civil war was not a fun battle. Many people died during that war. During the 1800’s the southern portion of the United States broke off and became its own separate country. They became the Confederate states of America or the Confederacy. The U.S. and the C.S. were very different countries. The C.S. heavily practiced slavery while slavery was banned in the U.S. The U.S. was more industry based while the C.S. was based on agriculture. The U.S. wanted the C.S. to rejoin with it. This lead to a civil war. The north ended up winning the civil war which contributes to Grant being a better general than Lee.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War is sometimes said to be the second war of American independence. This war was a nation fighting itself, North versus South, each side fighting for what they believed in. America suffered many tragedies from the war, but it also brought new advancements in technology and medicine, as well as battle strategy. The Battle of Gettysburg is often said to be the turning point of the Civil War. This battle was a major win for the Union, as it shattered the confidence of the South, which led to the Union winning many more battles and eventually winning the war. Jeb Stuart was a failure at the Battle of Gettysburg because he arrived two days late and failed to inform Lee of the Union’s…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This book follows differing social structures within The Confederate States of America and how those clashing cultures led to multiple changes of strategy in the mountain regions of the Confederacy. All of these combined factors led to multiple tragic events within the Confederacy. The main social groups that are discussed in the book are Rural and Urban Confederates, Confederate Mountaineers, and Unionist. It is important to understand each of the different social groups before a full social analysis can be conducted. Once the social aspect of the mountain regions is understood, the specific strategies used by both the Union and the Confederacy can be discussed.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had a great moral due to their general Robert E. Lee who was defeating the union in previous battles. Throughout the war the south was mainly playing a defensive role and the north would try to choke the south with their Anaconda Plan. The battle of Gettysburg however, was the south’s most northern battle and it gave the confederate army a chance to play more of an offensive role and possibly capture the union’s capital (Document A). If the confederacy had actually achieved this, there would have been a great chance that European countries would have aided the south and they could have won the war. But unfortunately for the southerners this was not the case and their defeat at the battle of Gettysburg and allowed the union to have a greater chance at winning the war. This single battle became a turning point of the civil war because it gave the northerners a chance at victory and made it much easier to defeat the…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the majority of deaths were from battles, a lot of people died from diseases. General McClellan’s strategy was to completely destroy Lee’s army. Even though the Confederates put up a really good fight, they were just outnumbered. Since the Union had a lot more soldiers they won, for instance the Union only put in less than three quarters of his force ,however, Robert E. Lee put all of his soldiers in the battle. Seeing how low Lee was on soldiers it assured the Union they were going to win.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It would take too long to explain why there was very little electricity and no heat…

    • 8692 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays