Preview

Michael Walzer's Threefold Argument Against The Realist?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michael Walzer's Threefold Argument Against The Realist?
Michael Walzer argues against the realist view stating that war does fall under the aegis of morality rather than not. He states in his view that it is possible to fight a morally justified war and it is possible to fight it morally well. He uncovers the truth behind his view in a threefold argument which includes the melian dialogue, an analogy between strategy and morality, and a comparison on historical relativism. By uncovering his threefold argument, Walzer makes it very clear the morality is still involved in war and with this I agree. In Just War Theory, two types of questions are asked, those being questions under Just Cause and Just Mean. The Just Cause question is whether or not the war was undertaken for the right reasons. The Just Means question is whether or not the war is fought honorably. These questions are independent to a extent. For example, an unjust war could be fought with restraints and a just war could be pursued without any sense of limitations.
This differs from The Realist Argument because the only point to war from a realist perspective is to win. There are also no moral rules in realism This means that anything goes and there is no common power over sovereign states. When this happens, a realist believes that the nature of man is to fight and that these sovereign states …show more content…
This comparison shows the moral similarities across cultures and across time. This is not saying that the moral and strategic reality of war was the same for us as it was Genghis Khan or Hitler, but it is saying that the moral and strategic reality is not the actual activities that take place, but the opinions of mankind. When a leader takes an approach that is either unjust or morally wrong, the opinions of the civilians and the opinions of other leaders are brought out. These opinions are stated that what these individuals did were wrong and that they should be held
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ambrose, Hedges, Kudo, And Styron: Article Analysis
    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ambrose, Hedges, Kudo, And Styron: Article Analysis

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Michael Howard and the necessity of Studying War.
    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Howard and the necessity of Studying War.

    Throughout the book, he has challenged preconceived notions that have made his book persuasive about the necessity of studying war, so as to go into greater detail about the debates that he has introduced the reader to. One such example is that ‘war is bad’. One might think, especially in context to liberals that wars should not be fought and nations should resolve all their disputes peacefully through arbitration. Howard has presented examples of when it is essential to fight in a war, for example when war is necessary for freedom. Another example is of liberal visionaries like the Italian, Mazzini, whose ideas of peace could manifest through what he thought to be a just war. In this case it had to be war to get rid of their oppressive Austrian rulers.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Just War In Vietnam
    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War In Vietnam

    The Americans knew they had the weaker ground, since they were fighting on unfamiliar territory, let alone the fact that they were battling with standard, traditional warfare against a new, unknown style of warfare. Knowing this, and knowing that they were on the back foot, president Johnson still issued the orders to proceed with the war. This means that he and his generals were willingly subjecting their soldiers to combat on unfamiliar ground, against unfamiliar tactics. It was essentially subjecting them to their death. Even though, they still proceeded, which is unjust to the American soldiers. Knowing they cannot deny the orders, the Americans had to use un-conventional tactics of their own. Leading onto the third aspect of just war that I am discussing, the means of combat used. Since the Americans had the weaker strategies, they decided that it would be completely honorable, and morally acceptable to pillage homes of those who lived in peace and had nothing to do with the war. Then they proceeded to resort to rape, and other unethical means of…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    All Quiet On The Western Front: An Analysis
    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All Quiet On The Western Front: An Analysis

    War is a very controversial topic for many people. Depending on the person’s outlook on the war, it can be depicted as something good or bad. War brings destruction wherever it goes, whether it is on a place or the people, and it ultimately is inevitable. War also protects a country from having further destruction and keeps the people at home safe from any danger. As a person can see in many recordings of war, there are many comparisons and contrasts that are expressed through soldiers, veterans, and civilians. Some comparisons seen in many of the testimonies given by effected people are dehumanization, dislocation, and alienation; but they also have contrasts that can be seen through nationalism, technological advancements, and the coming home for many…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism
    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Compatible Are Just War and Pacifism?
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Compatible Are Just War and Pacifism?

    The Just War theory tries to judge whether it is ‘just’ to go to war and how the war should be fought. It tries to reconcile three things; taking a human life is seriously wrong. That states have a duty to defend their citizens and defend justice and thirdly protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust War Analysis
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just And Unjust War Analysis

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust Wars Analysis
    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just And Unjust Wars Analysis

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Proponents Vs Pacifists
    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Just War Proponents Vs Pacifists

    “War, what is it good for”? The lyrics to the 60’s pop song, provokes the question that Just War proponents and Pacifists have wrestled with throughout history, reaching opposite conclusions. Those in favor of Just War theory, say war is only good insofar as it is fought for the right reasons and brings about the right end. Whereas, Pacifists reject war completely, preferring peaceful means to resolve conflict. But which one is morally and ethically right? Which one should be adopted and practiced by the Nations of this World? Upon examining the logic and philosophical implications of each ethical stance, one is able to sympathize with them both, seeing their values and virtue.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics War
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethics War

    The just war tradition is a collection of historical views and theories, which eventually developed the just war theory. The just war theory follows a criteria that distinguishes when a country is just to use military action against another country. This theory attempts to protect the innocent and preserve the basic human rights. The criteria which it follows, is meant to examine when the moral decision to use force arises from a conflict of prima facie obligations. The theory operates within a prima facie duty to use force as a last resort in defense of human life and values. When the moral tension arises between these prima facie obligations, they conflict with each other. The just war theory indicates that when the prima facie duty not to injure or kill others can be overridden by another prima facie duty, to act justly and always pursue justice.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What is the purpose of Just War
    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the purpose of Just War

    The purpose of Just War is to provide moral guidance throughout the stages of war to ensure that the reasons for going to war are morally justifiable, that war is conducted morally, and the transition back to peace is done in a moral manner. The purpose is to bring some semblance of rules, morality, and just fighting to the chaos, or as some believe, the immorality of war. There are times when although terrible, war is unavoidable and a better option than Pacifism. “There may be responsibilities so important, atrocities which can be prevented or outcomes so undesirable they justify war.”1…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's Definition Of Punishment
    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nietzsche's Definition Of Punishment

    Despite the lack of definition, realism has been successful and has become a dominate theory in international relations (Rosenberg, 1994). Therefore defining it remains an active argument, meaning realist scholars continue to debate the fundamental assumptions of realist…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just War Essay
    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just War Essay

    Many extreme pacifists reject the concept of just war and all justifications for violence. I actually disagree with the extreme pacifist that rejects the concept of just war and all justifications for violence. I feel that sometime war is something that just has to be done in order for people to solve curtain conflicts. St. Augustine is the known as the first one actually noted to be the founder of the theory of just war. A Just war is a theory that deals with the reason on why and how curtain wars are fought. The concept on a just war can be justified by concept of just war or the historical origin of just war reasoning. The just war aspect is about the ethical reasons on why they war is justified, and if that was last step that could have been…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Importance Of Just War
    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of Just War

    Just wars are also extremely important because they contribute to the idea that, the nation has a duty to protect the United States citizen's rights and safety. As stated in the Just War Doctrine “A Just War must follow at least one of the pieces of Criteria to be considered Just”. In order to have a Just war, the following criteria must be met both before, during and after the war. Before a war, nations should try to constitute peace, or in other words, only use war as a last resort. Although there may not always be a way to only use warfare as a last resort, nations should not participate in a war unless the nation has a reasonable chance of success. However, during an armed conflict the amount of force used, must be proportional to the damage or force that the other army has used and the overall purpose of the war must be to establish good or correct evil. After the Just War has occurred, nations should try to constitute peace with the other combatants. Although many people have diverse opinions and thoughts about what a just war is, leaders should always protect the safety and rights of the citizens and maintain a solid reason for going to war and continuing a…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics