Preview

Mid-Semester Exam

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
560 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mid-Semester Exam
Both Heraclitus and Parmenides were obsessed with change. Explain how change fits into each of their philosophical systems. Are there any two similarities in their two accounts? Why are they so important to later metaphysicians such as the particle theorists?

Heraclitus believed in the unity of opposites. The succession of the opposites brings out his key notion of change. The successive manifestation of contrary properties in an object is a way of saying that everything undergoes change. All, things, according to Heraclitus, are in a constant flux. Comparing this change to stepping into a river, he says: ‘you cannot step twice into the same river.’ I agree with this proposition considering the fact that the molecular property of a river at an instance is not the same, since it is constantly flowing. The constant flowing of the river suggests a constant movement of molecules so that new molecules interact with objects the river is in contact with. One may return to the same river, but fresh waters have flowed into it, making it different. With this notion of change, it can be said that nothing retains its identity, though it remains the same thing. The object therefore endures, even though it is undergoing constant change and some of its components or characteristics may be lost. I think that the unity of the opposites therefore is a necessity for the existence of equilibrium, so that though in opposition, they maintain a balance and order in an object, and in nature as a whole. This unity which brings about balance and order is what Heraclitus calls the logos.
Parmenides’ views are a contrast to those of Heraclitus; a sharp turn around the notion of change. He denies the reality of change, motion and void. For him, change is impossible and incoherent. All existence is permanent, ungenerated, indestructible and unchanging. In his view, there are no opposites, no plurality. For him, change and motion were mere illusions. He favored pure reason as a path of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Midterm Proctored Exam

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - By preparing for my Midterm Proctored Exam, I would study my notes daily. Every day I would try to do a quiz after I study a chapter or two chapters to boost my knowledge. I would also, print off some extra notes and diagrams off the internet or from the PowerPoints that thought would be useful for me to memorize everything that I needed to know. During the three days before the exam, I started to go by the midterm study guide and highlighted in my notes strictly everything that was going to be on the test. Then, I would just study over everything until I feel I am truly ready for the test and then pray for the best.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He examined that everything that exists was in a permanent state of 'movement' or 'motion'. By 'motion' Aristotle was linking it to the Greek word 'motus' which refers to change. He noticed that everything in the universe is in a state of change, for example, the weather and seasons are always changing. Even the human body is going through the process of change every single day. Everyday the body changes, we grow old and age, we lose hair and skin cells.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |In 250 to 500 words, using the readings about Plato’s search for |In 250 to 500 words, based on Aristotle’s science of the first |…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm Exam

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Summarize the notion of sustainability as described by Paul Hawken. Describe briefly the 12 steps he suggests towards a sustainable society.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Phaedo is a dialog between Phaedo, Cebes and Simmias where Socrates gives some arguments for the immortality of the soul. In this work, Phaedo tells us about Socrates’ final days, who has been convicted to death. Great philosopher does not have a fear of death because he believes that when a man dies, the soul still exists even if the body perishes.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In contrast, Heraclitean thought presents “Becoming” as primary, while “Being” is secondary (Ulfers, Lecture). Heraclitus regards change and temporality as ultimate in a perpetual process of “Becoming.” Heraclitus goes on to argue that opposites are simultaneously present in a state known as chiasmic unity. Chiasmic unity constitutes a paradoxical unity of opposites, which binds opposites together and keeps them apart. Heraclitean thought favors the logic of “both/and,” which violates the Paramenidean logic of “either/or.”…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garber on Descartes

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Daniel Garber’s article, “Descartes against his teachers: The Refutation of Hylomorphism”, the metaphysics of the early scholastics is presented to show the similarities and differences between what Descartes was taught through scholasticism and what he came to refute. Through analysis of the article I will present what Descartes considered to be the central ideas of scholastic metaphysics, as well as show what he chose reject from that doctrine, why he chose to reject it, and what he chose to retain, in the development of Cartesian metaphysics.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Segal, Charles. "The Problem of the Gods in Euripides ' Hecuba." Materiali e discussioni per…

    • 3418 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parmenides: the Real Being

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Parmenides, as did Heraclitus before him, wrote about a state known as "What Is." However, they differed sharply in their view of that state. Parmenides insisted that "What Is" be viewed as a constant. Heraclitus' focus was on elements transferring to and from opposites. Parmenides concentrated on a sense of "being." Heraclitus believed in a flux or "Yin and Yang" in the world that promoted harmony and stability, "What is opposed brings together, the finest harmony is composed of things at variance." (pg29, frg49) For Parmenides, "What Is" leads us to the truth about our universe, in that it is timeless, eternal, motionless, perfectly uniform, the same all throughout. "There are signs that being ungenerated, it is also imperishable." (pg38, frg8) He believed there was never any change in the universe just as Heraclitus believed it is a constantly changing circle. Parmenides' definition for "What Is" was simple. There weren't many requirements, "Whole and of a single kind and unshaken and complete." If the state of being fits his requirements then it was "What Is." However, his requirements, as simple as they are, are so broad that they exclude most, if not all, of the entire physical world. In response to Heraclitus, Parmenides argued that "What Is" could not change out of what it is; therefore, no opposite can exist. All of his descriptions of "What Is" led his contemporaries and followers to understand that "What Is" is not physical in a way that can be described. While his claims of "What Is" might suggest otherwise, it was not Parmenides' goal to throw the traditional vision of the cosmos out the window. He was merely searching for a clearer distinction between truth and appearance. Parmenides believed that "What Is" was so pure that it would hold the basis of truth for everything that has happened in the past and will happen in the future.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his work, Heraclitus claimed that the universe is in a constant state of flux, initiated by a law-like order which he called logos. Logos is best defined as, “the divine reason or plan which coordinates a changing universe.” (2) Heraclitus believed this “dynamic equilibrium” existed by a constant interchange of elements. “...for Heraclitus, fire changes into water and then into earth; earth changes into water and then into fire.” (1) To represent logos, Hericlitus compared the series of transformations in nature to the element of fire, inconstant and rapidly changing.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First Quarter Exam

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. These two summer migrants are most likely to be heard in suburban or rural gardens near woodland.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A school of consistency

    • 785 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Parmenides was known best for the idea that nothing ever changes at all. He believed the exact opposite of Heraclitus. He also said that all changes are just an illusion and they cannot be proven to be real. I agree and disagree with Parmenides’ ideas about how nothing ever changes. I agree in the sense that there is enough continuation of identity to say a school is the same school. But, I also disagree about how he states that the universe consists of one thing and that all changes are illusions. I think that although changes occur there are things that will keep the continuation of a school’s identity. A changing phenomena like a school being completely torn down can meaningfully retain the same identity across the changes by keeping the same name, location, mascot and school colors.…

    • 785 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    mr shane masters

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato and Parmenides: Parmenides ' Way of Truth and Plato 's Parmenides Francis Mc Donald Cornford 1939…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics