Preview

Milgram Experiment Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgram Experiment Analysis
After watching the Milgram experiment and the abuse that occur in Abu Ghraib prison. It is clear that leadership roles and authority position can both influence people to do thing that are harmful and bad to others. Leadership focuses on gaining people to follow them and is more based on free will. While authority has the power to tell people what to do. In the Milgram experiment many people back up why they continue administering shocks by stating, “Because an authority figure was telling them what to do and he was the expert” (Short, 2013). In the video a researcher of the Milgram experiment explained that people do what authority figures tells them to do because we are trained to follow authority figures and in the Milgram experiment the …show more content…
In addition, when leadership positions or authority roles are present it can motivate people to cross certain ethical lines. For example people were more likely to administer a high dangerous level of shock rather than to stop the experiment when they knew it was not right. In addition, people continue shocking the individual even when the participant said that they had enough and were done. Many people did not question the high voltage of shock and if they did the authority figure in the room influence them to continue administering shocks. The Milgram experiment goes along with ethics, because leadership roles and authority figures can push people to not use their ethical judgement during these situations and rely on putting the responsibility on the authority or leader rather than themselves. For examples in the Abu Ghraib prison military workers misused their authority roles by using abusive methods toward the prisoners. Furthermore, military worker supported their abusive and humiliation methods by stating “I was just doing my job” (Short, 2013). An ex-military worker in the Abu Ghraib prison supported what she did by “She did not feel like they were doing things that they were not supposed to do because they were being told to do them” (Short, 2013). When roles of authority or leader positions are involved in can cause people to obey orders and do things …show more content…
If the authority figure it the authority figure told them what to do then the responsibility and outcome would not be on them. By thinking in this way it allowed people to obey the expert figure and military commander to do unethical things. Another reason is that power in present in authority and leadership positions that can influence normal people and trained military workers to community unethical things, because the power of position allows them too. Also, authority roles can cause people to not question orders and do what their told because we are trained to followed people that are higher in command than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Authority and Identity usually lead to compliances and conformity and these techniques usually occur in real life situation too. To test out if human being would lose their moral and social values when they lost their individuality, Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in 1971 to see how readily people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoner in a role-playing exercise that simulated prison life (Zimbardo - Stanford Prison Experiment, 2008). This experiment was called The Stanford Prison Experiment and it was conducted at Stanford University. While the real life situation that was being mentioned, connected and relevant to Zimbardo’s experiment is the Abu Ghraib prison abuses. Abu Ghraib prison was a U.S. Army detention center for…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The acts of torture performed on the inmates at Abu Ghraib were both cruel and inhumane. But what if the reason the guards tortured the inmates was due to the result of obedience from their superiors. The cause of the torture of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib could have stemmed from situational factors instead of the will of a few aggressive soldiers. Authority figures that use persuasive methods can be very influential. There are many circumstantial possibilities as to why the guards treated the prisoners cruelly. Most people don't attribute the torture to many situational and external causes. In this case, most people attribute the torture to the internal faults of the guards when it could very well be outside sources at fault.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the experiment, the subject is told by the experimenter to give shocks from a scale of low to dangerously high to the person in the electric chair (who was an actor) when they give a wrong answer. The shocks were not real, but prior to the experiment, the subjects were given a small shock to influence them that the shocks in the experiment were true. After the experiment, Milgram assesses that “between the command and the outcome, there is a paramount force, which is the subject’s capacity for choosing their own behaviour” (p. 851). Although there were people who acted in immoral ways and increased the shock levels, there were also those who chose to renounce the unjust commands of authority, “providing affirmation of human morals and ideals” (p. 851). Therefore, people do have a choice in refusing to abide by authority’s rules and demands, but they choose not to because they do not want to suffer the…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what degree should people follow orders of superiors due to their authority? A Few Good Men is a movie where the moral difference between right and wrong is very unclear in the name of following authority. Professors of sociology, Kelman and Hamilton worked together on “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” where they tried to apply reason to the soldiers who committed a massacre of unarmed women and children during the Vietnam War. Theodore Dalrymple is a physician who wrote “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” by analyzing Milgram’s electric shock torture experiment to shine light on when is right to obey to authority, while he emphasizes not to follow authority blindly. These pieces can be used to understand how Marines were able to kill a fellow Marine in Rob Reiner’s A Few Good Men.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s findings, as read in the article “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You?”, apply to the first case of a manager and her fiancé ordering a teenage girl to strip and her following their commands. Milgram’s data suggested that humans are obedient even to the extent of blindly following authority. His findings were demonstrated by his experimental subjects who continued to increase the voltage to electrocute the learner, despite the subject’s moral code conflicting with the idea of…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The inconsistent application of Army standards leads to unethical decisions on a daily basis. Despite an emphasis on Army values at all levels, military leaders open themselves up to make unethical decisions when they don’t adhere to set standards. Despite the Army having clear standards on height/weight, APFT, the tattoo policy, and reporting requirements, leaders often take it upon themselves to ignore the standard or create their own. Leaders have the responsibility to maintain and enforce standards which are driven by regulations. If military leaders would consistently enforce these standards, ethical dilemmas and unethical decisions would be significantly reduced.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vietnam Leadership Role

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Kindsvatter, “The leader…occupied a difficult middle ground between protecting his men and carrying out his orders” (Kindsvatter 235). One of duties of the leader is keep his team safe and make sure they are doing well in any conditions, and also the leader is a part of the rank-ordered community so he/she needs to follow the order. Therefore, the leader may face a dilemma when an unreasonable order has assigned. Kindsvatter mentioned “Too often, in the late stages of the Korean and Vietnam Wars, leaders found themselves in such unenviable, no-win situations”…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie “A Few Good Men”, Lieutenant Kendrick is on trial, and seems like an unbreakable character. Kendrick does not realize the intensity of the punishment he gave to PFC Curtis Bell, because of falling down the slippery slope leading to pure obedience. Kendrick says, “The only proper authorities I'm aware of are my commanding officer Colonel Nathan R. Jessup and the Lord our God” stating openly that the only authorities he respects is his superior officer and God. (A Few Good Men) Because he says this, it supports the claim that military personnel carry out their orders regardless of danger, and in result, was considered one of the villains in the movie. They feed the soldiers information represented in the movie such as, “we follow orders or people die,” to scare them into submission to authority which is one of the initial steps to achieving blind obedience by authority and dehumanization. (A Few Good Men). However, Kelman and Hamilton explain how soldiers fall into an obedient state in three simple steps- authorization, routinization, and dehumanization in “The My Lai Massacre”. These authors advance the idea that soldiers continually feel obligated to follow authorities whether they agree with them or not, which leads to a psychological state where they lose the ability to make decisions, and finally are completely dehumanized to the point where they lose all human feelings especially empathy. The authors claim, “authority requires subordinates to respond in terms of their role obligations...often people obey without question even though [it] may entail great personal sacrifice or great harm to others” (Kelman and Hamilton 140). This point exercises the authors viewpoint that soldiers are being stripped of their humanity and becoming robots of mass destruction regardless of the danger they may…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forced To Lie

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The study found that many Army Officers have become “ethically numb.” The reason is that the Army created a culture of doing more with less and expected that all Soldiers met requirements no matter the cost even if it requires…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays