Preview

Milgram's Experiment Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
170 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgram's Experiment Essay
There are two types of people, leaders and followers, in Milgram’s experiment 65% of participants continued to go to the 450 volts experiment so this means people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure. Milgram came up with an Agency theory which states. That the person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behavior. That is, they are seen as legitimate. The person being ordered about is able to believe that the authority will accept responsibility for what happens. I believe this theory to be true, if I would have been in this experiment I would have been part of the 65% because I find myself to be a follower. I find most people being followers more than leaders, being a leader is having
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparison Of Not To Obey And Milgram's Experiment
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparison Of Not To Obey And Milgram's Experiment

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Replicating Milgram's Obedience Experiment
    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page

    Replicating Milgram's Obedience Experiment

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience And Ian Parker
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience And Ian Parker

    In Milgram’s article, he explains an experiment he designed to test whether the subjects of the experiment would refuse the orders of authority and follow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Does Darley Criticize The Milgram Experiment
    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Does Darley Criticize The Milgram Experiment

    Daniel Parks Freshman Studies Term II Critical Analysis and Milgram’s Response Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise, curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust), and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment, i.e. was the study worth doing in spite of the deception employed and its potential harm to the subjects. To Milgram, this criticism demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the goals and implications of the obedience study, to which he has responded by restating the goal of the experiment and explaining its beneficial effects upon the subjects.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments
    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Stanley Milgram Experiment
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Stanley Milgram Experiment

    The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Milgram's Experiment Justified
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Is Milgram's Experiment Justified

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Experiment
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Experiment

    Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram Experiment
    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stanley Milgram Experiment

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Experiment
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Milgram's Experiment

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Milgram Experiment Unethical
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Milgram Experiment Unethical

    Throughout our nation's history, we have taken part in many unethical means of gaining information or knowledge. Some of the more famous cases include, The Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment, The Stanford Prison experiment, and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm, they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place, but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The Milgram Experiment Morally Wrong
    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is The Milgram Experiment Morally Wrong

    This idea that perhaps seemingly “good” people can be able to ignore what is obviously morally wrong led me to an article about an interesting experiment: The Milgram experiment. This experiment, developed and run by Stanley Milgram, took place at Yale University in 1961. Milgram’s experiment consisted of having volunteers from a diverse range of backgrounds and occupations individually brought into a room and sat at a table with an array of levers. Across from this volunteer was another person who knew about the parameters of the experiment, who was strapped into a fake electric chair. A “scientist” in a lab coat would come in and tell the volunteer that he or she was to administer increasingly powerful shocks to the individual in the chair.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Milgram Experiment: Good Or Evil?
    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Milgram Experiment: Good Or Evil?

    How evil are we? Imagine being able to tell if someone was evil or good. In “The Milgram Experiment” they prove they can prove whether people are evil or good. In the test they have volunteer teachers come and help the learner learn.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milgram Experiment

    Stanely Milgram created an experiment involving Yale students to injure a third party using electric shocks and studied how many students would follow orders and go along with the experiment. The experiment consisted of two people, a leaner and a teacher. The teacher would be placed at a table containing many different buttons and switches that were labeled from slight shock to severe shock. Then the learner, who was an actor, was strapped down to prevent excessive movement. He is instructed that he will be asked questions and if he was to answer wrong he will receive an electric shock that would eventually increase in intensity.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Social Psychology Contagious?
    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is Social Psychology Contagious?

    He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics