The Medicines Company Case Write-Up: Terence Cho, Felipe Duarte, Aleks Loiko, Robert Shaw, and James Wang…
The first strategic issue that faces the firm lies at the very root of pharmaceuticals, the decision to be either an innovative or generic pharmaceutical company. Thus…
* (a) what it would mean for the organization to become tied to a pharmaceutical company at this stage of its development and…
The pharmaceutical company is made up of a number of different functions and departments. Each of these functions is given a responsibility in one area of the company’s activity. These departments are closely related and the success of the company is based on the ability of these functions to work together. The pharmaceutical companies rely on research and development to find new and innovation new drugs. In order for a drug to enter the market it must undergo a series of tests and clinical trials. There are phases the drug must go through and complete in order to meet the requirements of the FDA. The development of a drug is an ongoing journey, and it can take up to 12 years to develop a drug (Pharmaceutical Patents 2006). The pharmaceutical company uses…
Merck had a strategic vision to become embedded as part of a total healthcare solution. To obtain the coordinated pharmaceutical care most industry executives envision for the future, the company needed to acquire a PBM. The network and data…
4. If you were the director of R&D at a large pharmaceutical company, how might you apply the concept of “the innovation funnel?”…
According to the case, we can see that Norwalk Pharmaceutical Division of Chadwick was respected for the high quality of its products. And also, it focuses on customers’ feedback and what kind of new products desired by their customers. So, the overall strategy of Norwalk is differentiation. According to the business strategy that John Greenfield sketched out, invest in discovery of new compounds and unique mix of technical and commercial skills should not be included. Because the development cycles cost too much and indentify new applications for exiting compounds is much, much less expensive and efficient in earning profit. And develop unique mix of technical and commercial skills do not mean customers’ satisfaction, but means difficult and expensive in developing.…
Through the late 80's to early 90's, Merck was able to boast profits and sales through biochemistry drugs that were seen as breakthrough drugs in this new market. With this sudden boom competitors started to take notice and emulate Merck's business model. This success also brought up a number of questions within Merck as a company; mainly how was Merck going to keep up with its numbers and keep pumping new drugs into the market. By assessing some strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT Analysis) of the firm itself and offering some recommendations of how Merck may be able to conquer this challenge, you will be able to conclude that the success of Merck as a company relies heavily on its management and how they adapt the business model that is already in place to that of the ever-changing pharmaceutical industry.…
Yamada reorganization of drug discovery at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) following a merger to combat bureaucracy in decision making, approval, and authorization. This reorganization was necessary for the continued success of the company. Often the process for drug discovery and market is a slow and tedious process which can cost a company a lot in resources and financially. The smaller biotech companies are able to move quicker and push new drugs to market faster. The shift, Yamada thinks, will help produce an entrepreneurial environment akin to a smaller, biotechnology outfit. This reorganization placed nearly 2,000 research scientists into six centers of excellence in drug discovery (CEDD). Each CEDD focused on a small set of therapeutic areas and possessed decision rights over the progression of pharmaceutical compounds through the early stages of development. These groups managed the pipeline from Lead Optimization through Proof of Concept. Each CEDD had full control over its own budget which could be spent internally or externally to deliver their best possible pipeline. The goals in each of these moves was to drive accountability deeper into the organization, reduce central oversight as much as necessary and foster a “biotech-like” atmosphere in a very large bio/pharmaceutical company.…
Q3. Analyze Merck’s innovation strategy. Does Merck’s innovation engine need fixing? Why or why not?…
I do not think it was necessary to relax IPR rules in order to ensure that adequate supplies of AIDS medications would be available for distribution in the developing world because the US took initiative to fix high drug prices and low-quality health infrastructures.…
Oh,H. and Pizam, A. 2008. Handbook of Hospitality Marketing Management. illustrated ed. s. l.: Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0080450806, 9780080450803…
2. How does focusing on orphan drugs affect the types of resources and capabilities a biotech firm needs to be successful?…
Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999, and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research, and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995, Merck had launched 15 new products that earned $5.9 billion on sales of $32.7 billion. Furthermore, Merck may agree to license new drugs from other firms and with its larger capital and greater assets, can assume the risk of submitting the drug through various regulatory approval phases. If the drug becomes profitable, Merck can earn significant cash flows while paying a royalty to the licensor. However, most important is the option that Merck has in deciding when to abandon or continue on this project (deferability or optionality). If Merck reaches a point when its expected NPV is negative, it can simply abandon the project. As a licensee, Merck can allow smaller biotechnology firms to focus on research and development. These smaller firms often have smaller budgets and are not financially or personnel equipped to handle the costly and long FDA approval process, and the subsequent marketing, distribution, and sales of new drugs. This task is better suited for a larger company, such as Merck, which has more resources and money.…
ALZA, a pharmaceutical company that has led the industry for over a decade, has been largely successful due to their unique technical innovation. Rather than specializing in discovering new drugs and treatments for medical conditions, ALZA instead focuses their pharmaceutical talents on developing new methods to deliver drugs to patients. From skin patches to time released capsules, ALZA captures their market by providing their technologies to all major pharmaceutical companies, in return charging royalties that has led the company to realize immense consecutive profits. However, drug delivery technologies are constantly evolving, which has caused more effective and efficient methods to appear at a rapid rate. While ALZA is a leader in its industry, it needs to invest in advancing their own technologies if it wants to enjoy its current state of profitability, growth, and leadership. To implement this effort of advancing its drug delivery technologies, Martin Gerstel, CEO of ALZA, approved a 40 million dollar proposal to aid in developing its technologies. Yet, the solution wasn't nearly as simple as they had hoped, the company still needed to develop a method of organizing and paying for the 40 million dollar project. The company came up with three options:…