Preview

Minors Should Be Tried As Adults

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
648 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Minors Should Be Tried As Adults
Everyone is Different Even though children may not be fully developed until they are eighteen (women) or 25 (men) they know not to murder. There are exceptions, such as a mental disability or a situation that might be threatening that child's life. Children have been tried as adults as young as thirteen years old. At the ages of one to fifteen the murder would have to be a very clear intention of murder to try the child as an adult. No one person's crime is the same as another, therefore no one should be tried the same. Minors, depending on their situation could be tried as adults. Children going through adolescence have emotional instability, me being a child going through this phase represent an example. The way I might react to something is going to different than the way someone else would, this is because no two people are alike. The juvenile and adult court system often times try to lump people that commit similar crimes together, it is not always a “fair trial” as promised by our declaration. If my neighbor was to murder his parents for whatever reason, and I was to do the same, we would be both looked at as two horrible kids who did the unthinkable act of patricide, not why. …show more content…
Murder is mostly seen as an act of complete disregard of human life, but that is not always the case. Minors facing a gun or a deadly person might be forced to the point of killing someone. It should be avoided at all times, but it can be the last remaining option, when this is the case the judge and jurors should investigate before making a conviction. There has been times where a minor is convicted guilty and later found they had no other option or it was self-defense. Everyone makes mistakes, but when it comes to determining how someone else will live their life, there should be no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Historically, children have been regarded as constitutionally different from adults. This fact is evident in the way past cases have been decided. Certain juvenile characteristics such as their “ immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences” illustrates the clear discrepancy between children and adults. Furthermore, the majority contend that instances that call for punishment as severe as life imprisonment without parole will be exceedingly uncommon and rare. Requiring that all juvenile convicted of homicide are sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole regardless of age or other mitigating factors violates the principle of proportionality.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often times it is easier to neglect the inevitability of death, but there is no neglecting the further rebuked notion of murder. The world is quite familiar with this utmost evil and shows no tolerance, but when it comes to the instance of a child who has committed the same crime, the rationale of justice is flipped on its head. There are many conflicts to be raised by two major viewpoints. Those who believe that adolescents deserve mandatory life in prison are understandably hurt and angered by their losses, but they disregard the sheer weight of certain particulars. When a juvenile is convicted of such an act, their age and environment in which they were raised prove to be reasonable mitigation for their horrid conducts.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles should be tried as adults depending on the level of the crime. Based on the information in , “On Punishment and Teen Killers ”, Jennifer Jenkins, explains how a teenager killed her younger sister ,which was pregnant with her first child, and her husband If the juvenile knew what they were doing they should be tried as an adult. Juveniles that commit huge crimes should face adult sentencing since they are responsible.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Depending on the crime that a minor has committed, a jury or judge should choose to try the person as an adult. For example, Lionel Tate, who was twelve, beat a 6 year old girl to death while wrestling. Lionel Tate is a person that Marjie Lundstrom used in her article; “Kids Are Kids - Until They Commit Crimes”. That happened because television had influenced a young boy. That doesn't make him a murderer, but yet he…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile receives crucial punishment, how could you give a twelve year old sentenced to life without possibility of parolo. Now that is just heartless to do something like that to a juvenile. The reason for juvenile being tried as adult is what happened in the 80s and 90s, many juvenile were in gangs and causing tremendous crime making the crime rate raise for the younger generation.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know A child’s exposure to one type of violence increases the likelihood that the child will be exposed to other types of violence and exposed multiple times? Should everyone be tried fairly excluding age difference? A 14-year-old boy, Joshua Smith, shot his mother to death as she slept on the couch.Only because he wasn't allowed to hang with gangs and bring females over anymore.Joshua Smith wasn't tried as an adult because he was under age and they felt for him. So let’s say you were that child mother would you want your son to walk free over your death. Should children who commit violent crimes be tried as adults? Every 10.11 seconds a child commits a crime and every 1 out of 10 kids are tried as adults. I believe children who commit a violent crime should be tried as an adult due to the choices they make there should be no age limit.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A teenager should not be tried on the same level as an adult, if they can not do things an adult does. Juveniles are too young and know little about the world; therefore, they should not receive the harsh punishment that adults are being given. Since we are the parents of our kids “It’s why they can’t smoke, or drink, or go to R movies without our OK” (Lundstrom). Adults are lot older, intelligent, mature than teens; therefore, they should not be tried on the same level as adults. Although minors have some knowledge their brains are not matured like adults to make right and wrong decisions. It goes far as beyond to saying teens will not know what they did wrong until they are told. In the article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” Gail Garinger states, “Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent brain responsible for controlling thoughts, actions and emotions are not fully developed. They cannot be held to the same standards when they commit terrible crimes.” This shows that teenagers are not capable of making decisions and they can not control what they do, even if it is wrong they will not know. Teens should not be charged as adults for the crimes they…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many laws that specifically prohibit teen and adolescent under the age of 18 from doing many things and are there to “protect” us. There is always a punishment when they are broken. The same should apply, if a juvenile is to commit a heinous crime like homicide or first-degree murder, they should be tried and sentenced for the crime. Therefore, I do agree that juveniles should be tried as an adult when they commit the same crimes as that of an adult.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If juvenile are tried one as an adult and then juveniles will be tried as an adult in all cases. In a few cases, such as a murder or rape, the assumption is that a juvenile should be tried as an adult unless the trial court rules that the case should be sent to juvenile court. Some states have laws that require a youth’s case to be tried in adult court these laws usually based this automatic transfer on the youth’s age, the seriousness or type of crime, and the juvenile’s prior record.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eassy

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to a Sacramento to Bee article written in 2003 youth are “emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense” It may common knowledge that a toddler doesn’t understand complex situations like an adult would, but the truth is around half of the kids in the age range of 14 to 15 don’t either. A study show that when compared with young adults children ages eleven to thirteen were more than three times are likely to be found “Seriously impaired” in understanding the judicial process and aiding their own defense. But so we as teenage s know right from wrong? As teen we are prone to do things that are frowned upon by adults. We are in the stages of life when we are most susceptible to peer _ pressure.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kentucky, and in many other states as well, after the age of 18 you are considered an adult. This is the level of majority. If someone were to commit a crime at this age or older they would be tried as an adult. Children under the age of 18 cannot be sentenced to death or to life without possibility of parole. This is because children are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well processed decisions. Opinions from one person to the next differ as there are several reasons concerning juveniles how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases (Southerland). The issue may be more of a debate as some people would say that kids do not have enough reasoning and lack common sense. Others, on the other hand, would say that juveniles have plenty of brains and common sense. There are strong reasons as to why juveniles should not be tried as adults and should not be eligible for life without parole.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2010, juveniles committed 8% of homicides. (PBS 2014) When it comes to trying juveniles as adults, many people think that this is too harsh of a punishment for young criminals, but others think that they should get what they deserve. There is a famous saying “do the crime, do the time”. Our society tends to think that juveniles do not have the mental, and physical stabilities that adults do. Over the years, our society has changed their views and started treating children/juveniles as young adults. Some people think that juveniles should be given a second chance since they are our children of the future, but others disagree and believe that juveniles know what they are doing and that they should be tried as adults. Each juvenile case can be different and should be treated accordingly looking at the severity of the crime. Depending on the crime and the severity of the crime can depict what kind of punishment a juvenile can face.…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juvenile justice system has been in existence for over 100 years. The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate the child, not to enforce excessive punishment. The system involves children under the age of eighteen years old. There is a line between juveniles and adult offenders. Just because the offender is under the age of eighteen, does that make him or her incapable of being charged for a crime and be convicted just like an adult? This question comes to mind when a child commits a crime such as murder. Should a child be convicted and suffer the same consequences as an adult? Or should the system just accept the fact that the child does not know any better and release them? From a moral standpoint, it would not be fair to subject a child to the death penalty but it seems like the justice system outweighs many moral standpoints.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Supreme Court ruled is as a “cruel and unusual punishment,” the sentence if fair because the convicted committed an act of murder that took away another person’s life. Such an example is Greg Ousley, who purposely murdered his parents and planned the murder days before he committed it (Greg Ousely Is Sorry, 9). Unlike previous scenarios mentioned, Ousley purposely planned for the murder of his parents. Despite the fact that he was still a teenager when he committed the murder, he had an intention to silence his parents and killed both of them in cold blood. This greatly differs from the previous convicted juveniles who accidentally killed their victims. Juveniles that have motives such as Ousley should be convicted as an adult and be sentenced a life in prison because, despite their age, they can think and act like an adult. Because of this, the Supreme Court’s decision of disallowing “teenagers” from “cruel and unusual punishments” should be overturned on certain cases, because, as seen in Ousely, some teenagers are capable and can plan murders beforehand. This not only reveals that certain teenagers can plan beforehand, but that they can think like adults in order to murder someone with…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, murder is wrong no matter one's age. Teens at some point must take responsibility for their actions. It's one thing to make a wrong decision to break the law, but another when you're taking someone's life. At any age you take a life, you should give your life up. Americans can easily resolve this issue by instilling in young children that it's wrong to kill. Nobody should get away with…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays