Preview

Miranda Warnings

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
997 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miranda Warnings
Miranda Warnings
Kaplan University
Madeline Michell
09/19/2010

CJ 211
Professor HooMook
Madeline Michell
09/19/2010

Miranda requires that the contents of the warnings be stated in "clear and unambiguous language" (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 p.468) lest the process devolve into "empty formalities." This quote explains that Miranda warnings should be explained in any other language that the criminal understands with more clarity even if the criminal is an American citizen or a non-citizen. Unfortunately, many people have mistaken that only American citizens must be read Miranda rights and noncitizens need not to be read the rights. What a negative statement to make. Miranda rights do apply regardless of the citizenship of an arrested suspect. Anyone detained or arrested, and then questioned, must be read Miranda rights if any statement obtained is to be used in a criminal prosecution thereafter.
On June 14, 2008 at 12:30 am, I received a call about a burglary crime committed in Brooklyn, east New York. As I approach the house I saw a male approximately the age of 17-20 years old, outside of the house looking suspicious and dressed in black. I decided to arrest him. Although, I don’t sufficient evidence of the male been a thief, I took him to the police station to interrogate him. The victim arrived to see the boy; the victim asks me in English what is happening. Both the boy and the victim’s family member do not know their rights. I am sure the young boy was involved in the burglary. As I questioned the arrestee he replies to me in mandarin.

Now the question is what should I do in this case? What I would do is tell the main person in charge at that moment, it could be the captain, sergeant, or lieutenant, that the criminal needs an interpreter in order to Mirandize the suspect. Also, I would deal with the family in English since they are English speakers. If the family doesn’t understand the meaning of Miranda rights I would explain the meaning of



References: http://web.ebscohost.com.kaplan.uah.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&hid=8&sid=b09a287e-f065-4a19-b757-baa1b2d51e4a%40sessionmgr14{Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, Citation taken for pg-1at 1:45 pm September 19, 2010 http://web.ebscohost.com.kaplan.uah.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&hid=10&sid=5f1f2b87-ca96-4489-a725-e51b44ab86e9%40sessionmgr14 Miranda v. Arizona citation taken for pg-2 at 9:35pm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On Friday July 31st 2015 at approximately 11:55pm, I Karl O’Brian Dent Sr. Badge # 920, A Sworn Peace Officer operating under the authority entrusted in me by the Cripple Creek Police Department, County of Teller, State of Colorado for an Agency Assist requested by the Teller County Sheriff’s Department at 11235 Independence Avenue, Goldfield Colorado 80860. While in route I was advised by dispatch that I would be meeting with Deputy A to assist with finding and apprehending Mr. Rock Star DOB 11/15/1981. Dispatch advised me that Mr. Star was a Native American male wearing blue jeans, black shoes and no wearing a shirt. I was also advised by dispatch that the victim was a Caucasian female Ms. Red Bull DOB 10/07/1987 and was wearing a blue short, white t - shirt and flip flops. I arrived at 11235 Independence Avenue, Goldfield Colorado 80860 Saturday August 01st 2015 at approximately 00:21am…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reynold Lancaster discussed how the Miranda warning is used by police officers and other law enforcements when they arrest a person of interest. The Miranda warning allows the officers…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today’s society almost all policemen never forget to read the person under arrest their rights because they know about the Miranda vs Arizona case. I believe that they have put more pressure on the police to say the rights because its a matter of the criminal getting let go because they forgot to read them even if the person already knows their rights. If in case that that does happen I still would not let the criminal go if the case was for something bad or something that would harm…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mr. Miranda fully apprised of his constitutional rights when the officers failed to inform Mr. Miranda that he could remain silent and have an attorney present at the interrogation?…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    landmark case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda never knew he did not have to speak with the police was interrogated and confessed and was sentenced to jail. Later an attorney looked over the case and requested Judicial Review Claiming that Ernesto’s rights has been violated. In 1966 The Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s Conviction, and ruled that if a person is going to be taken in as a suspect they must be informed that they do have a right to and attorney. The suspect also has to be informed that the do not have to speak. The supreme court also ruled that if the suspect is not informed of these right the evidence obtained before hand can not be used in court. These rights are now known as the Miranda rights.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Case Study

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ernesto Miranda, a mexican immigrant living in the United States, was arrested by officers Carroll Cooley and Wilfred Young at Miranda's home in Phoenix, AZ. He was put into custody and taken to a local police station. Miranda was put into police lineup and was identified by the witness, Lois Jameson. Following, Miranda was interrogated for two hours by two police officers with the Arizona police department, before making a written and signed confession of the crimes. This confession was presented at trial and Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on each count of kidnapping and rape. The Supreme Court of Arizona found that Miranda's constitutional rights weren't personally violated, but ruled that police officers are required to…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some of the judges were not pleased with the ruling, they stated that Miranda’s written statement confessing to the crimes should not be completely ruled out and not used as evidence in the case in court. Justice Tom C. Clark claimed in his dissenting opinion, “the majority’s opinion created an unnecessary strict interpretation of the Fifth Amendment that curtails the ability of the police to effectively execute their duties” (Miranda v. Arizona). The judges that ruled in favor of Maranda stated that an individual who is being persecuted under the law should indeed know their rights, a defendant must be made aware of their right to remain silent prior to any interrogation, and they have the right for an attorney to be present during the interrogation. This case is important because it created the Miranda warning as a preventative criminal procedure to ensure that when criminals who are being prosecuted they are made aware that their fifth amendment is not being violated and that anything they say will be used against them in a court of…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Creation of the Miranda rights has changed the relationship between citizen state and police suspects. Citizens now have the right to be informed and assurance that they will be protected by institutional power. Suspects can now anybody that they had nothing to with it. The Miranda warnings are rights that are not protected by the Constitution. They are simply a precaution to guarantee protection against self –incrimination. Without the Miranda rights, the treatment of criminals would not be fair.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different ways of interrogations are used by officers to deal with suspects. Most often we do not know what is going on inside the interrogation room. The main purpose of the interrogation is to get possible answers that pacify their need of evidence to the case. Police are most criticizes of their way handling interrogations during custodial questioning which often uses deception to get whatever evidence needed. According to Skolnick and Leo there are eight types of interrogations deceptions. Interview versus interrogate which is the most subtle way of deception. Most often overlooked strategy the police always employ on suspects. By telling the suspects that he is free and can leave any time thus engages him to voluntary answering of questions that otherwise be considered an interrogation into a non-custodial interview. Miranda Warning, in order for a questioning to be custodial, police recite their Miranda rights. This routinely delivered phrase is always delivered in a recital flat monotone of voice that makes this warning a bureaucratic ritual. Police sometimes used this warning to soften up suspects. The Court in Miranda that police cannot trick or deceive a suspect into waiving Miranda rights. The misrepresenting the nature or seriousness of the Offense which police exaggerate, overstate or understate the offense in order for the suspect to compel in answering questions during custody. Role playing where police play the role of a compassionate friend, bother or father figure who understands the suspect’s situation in order to have their trust then later on seek the opportunity to let the suspect confess for the good of the investigation. Misinterpreting the moral seriousness of the offense is the heart of the interrogation method that propounded by Inbau, Reid and Buckley’s influential police training manual. Police interrogating the case offer suspects excuses or moral justification for their misconduct by providing the suspect with an external attribution…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rights you are read while being placed under arrest are the Miranda rights. They state that what you say will be used against you in court and that you have the right to an attorney. These rights are read to protect your freedom and to inform you of your constitutional rights. It became procedure to state the rights after the Miranda vs. Arizona case. Ernesto Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for counts of kidnapping and rape. In court, Miranda argued that he did not know his rights and that they should have been told to him. He is the reason that criminal suspects receive more justice from police officers.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays