Preview

Miss

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miss
‘Who’s for the game’ is a conversational poem through which Jessie Pope’s representation of war encapsulates the jingoistic opinion of her culture: that war was fun, jovial and full of glory that any young man could earn if only he had the courage.

In essence, this poem is based around the comparison of war to a sporting game and in lines 1 and 2 we can see this metaphor being created with the words “...the game, the biggest that’s played” and “game of a fight.”. This lighthearted tone continues when Pope utilises the idea linking nature of rhyme to contrast the ‘courageous’ options and the ‘cowardly’ options, as can be seen in lines 2 and 4. After reading these lines, it is clear to the reader that Pope has represented war as a game noble and glorious.

On line 11 Pope suggests that the worst thing that could happen to a soldier is to return home on crutches - not death - and on lines 7 and 8 Pope asks every young man if they want to take part in the “show” of war or if they want to just sit in the “stands”. These 3 lines make evident the crux of the second side to Pope’s representation. In saying that the worst thing that could possibly happen to a soldier is coming home on crutches, Pope has represented war as not only noble and glorious - but harmless!

The modern world hadn’t yet experienced war on as large or costly scale as World War 1 and Jessie pope was only one of many poets whose poems are evidence of this fact. Who’s For The Game is a quintessential jingoistic poem of that time - one that represents war as honourable, noble, and ultimately, a glory machine for which to work one must only have the same amount of courage that is needed to play a game of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weapons Training Analysis

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many techniques used in the poem by Dawe to convey that war is not a game. An example of this is how he uses rhyming, “If you had one more brain… open that drain”. This expresses the pointlessness of war mainly through the words “brain” and “drain”. It shows that Dawe wants to express that if you were stupid enough to go to war, you may as well throw your life away. This concept of futility is also expressed through the repetition of “dead, dead, dead” in the last line of the poem, which emphasises the tremendous loss in war that is inevitable. Dawe also shows that war is not a game through the technique of juxtaposition at the very end of the poem in the sentence “that's right grab and check the magazine man its not a woman’s tit”. This shows that the soldiers must take the weapons training serious in order to survive in…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriotism, determined and controversial can all sum up the propaganda poem ‘’Who’s For The Game’’ which is jingoistic poem. Jessie Pope describes war duty as an honourable thing to do and uses rhetorical questions repeatedly to describe the men who don’t go as cowards. The opening line ‘’Who’s for the game, the biggest that’s played’’ which is a extended metaphor through the poem as the war is referred as a game. The word ‘’biggest’’ emphasizes the importance and fun which the war a waits them.…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Owen expresses his anguish and anger at a personal level, the aggressive nationalism belonged to the armchair patriots those living safely at home, and the war mongers who used patriotism to encourage men to go to war like Jessie Pope. His poem was written as a reply to Jessie Pope's poem 'Who's for the game?' which glorifies war and heightens the idea of patriotism, she suggests 'coming back with a crutch' is honourable whereas 'lying low' is cowardly. Owen addresses Pope as 'My friend' as though he is mocking her in a sarcastic manner, 'you would not tell with such high zest' suggesting that she is unaware of the horrors of the war and if she knew she wouldn't tell with such positive attitudes, concluding with ' The old Lie: Dulce et Decorum sat pro patria more' capitalizing the 'Lie' emphasis the stupidity of dyeing for your country, and mocking Jessie Pope because she is wrong.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    miss

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Your assessor will also support you in completing the workbook. He or she will visit you to discuss the workbook and what you need to do. The assessor will make sure that you fully understand what you will need to learn and record in your workbook.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Please ensure work is referenced correctly, reflect on your own practice with the children as much as possible in order to link knowledge and practice. Check spelling and grammar and ensure that professional language is used throughout.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 1657 Words
    • 7 Pages

    |Title and Level of Qualification |BTEC Extended Diploma in Business level 3 Year 2 |…

    • 1657 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    My friend, you would not tell with such high zest to children ardent for some desperate glory, the old lie; Dulce et Decorum est Pro patria mori.[line 25-28] The lie that people must tell themselves about the war when the truth is that you are probably going to die. In comparison to the final scene of the movie “War Horse,” when the son comes home on Joey and the mom…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dramatic irony is a poetic device that has greatly enhanced the meaning and impact of the wars poems of the 18th and 19th century. It is one of the poet’s most useful tools in nourishing the interest of its readers, because it provides a contrast between an instant situation and a future outcome. In “War Is Kind”, Crane Illustrates a man, possibly a general, informing a range of family members of the passing of their kin. He informs the maiden of her lover’s “thirst for fight” (7) and how the “unexplained glory flies above” (9) a battle-god’s kingdom “where a thousand corpses lie” (11). He attempts to comfort a babe, whose father “tumbled in the yellow trenches” and “Raged at his breast, gulped and died” (13-14), all in honor of “the virtue of slaughter” (20). He consoles the grieve-stricken mother “whose heart hung humble as a button” (23). All of the speaker’s statements contradict each other in order for Crane to show that, despite the title of the poem and the constant refrains of war being kind, it truly is heartless and…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The poems are different as they both talk about different things, Jessie pope speaks of the parades if you win and survive, and she speaks of how it is a big game, her poem is titled: Who’s For the Game? The first line is: ‘who’s for the game, the biggest that’s played the red crashing game of a fight?’ This shows her slack attitude towards war and its dire consequences; however, as women weren’t allowed to fight in war, they can’t really be blamed for not knowing the truths of it, and giving out false impressions.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dulce et Decorum Est and Who’s for the Game? are similar and different in many ways, but are both great poems. While Dulce et Decorum Est, written by Wilfred Owen, didn’t believe that it is sweet and right to die for your country, Who’s for the Game?, written by Jessie Pope, does believe this quote is just. These poems both discuss their beliefs/ideas of war and support themselves very deeply and keen. Wilfred Owen says that the saying “it is sweet and right to die for your country” is an old lie. Meanwhile, Jessie Pope says that your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she’s looking and calling for you.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hardy's “Channel Firing” is a poem written in 1914, four months prior to the start of World War 1. This historical context is crucial to understanding the poem as it expresses the dark and sorrowful foreshadowing of the months before the war, creating feelings of tension, turmoil and unrest. There were, at the time, many young men who did not share the common unease, more so tension turned to excitement, turmoil to eagerness and unrest to anticipation. The split between society in the months leading up to the war is portrayed in Hardy's poem. For example, the anonymous character Hardy embodies in this poem states how he “thought it was judgement day” as he hears gunfire, quite clearly depicting his fear and others around him as he uses the collective term, “we”. The “howl of wakened hounds” could also be used to describe the fear and tension of society as we are presented with a somewhat evil and malevolent image of howling hounds, hardly an image to inspire joy or happiness. In contrast to the aforementioned points, the excitement and anticipation of some young men at the time could be portrayed through the use of the quote “All nations striving strong to make Red war yet redder”. This quote could perhaps be interpreted to show the bloodthirsty nature of man, not seeking to win freedom but showing how eager each nation was to annihilate another.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1914 poetry

    • 763 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Jessie Pope’s ‘Who’s for the game’, she gives us crude propaganda throughout the whole poem. She gives ordinary circumstances and links them in with war, showing who is heroic enough to ‘grip and tackle the job unafraid’ and who is too cowardly that ‘he’d rather sit tight’. Also, Pope subtly forces any man who decides to stay home to feel guilty and faint-hearted, she uses another form of propaganda. However, she tried to make the war seem easier than it was so she wrote the poem like a nursery rhyme, in a patriotic and jolly way. She relates the whole poem to a game to decrease the seriousness of the war. Pope uses subtle persuasion to further convince more men to go to war: ‘Who knows it won’t be a picnic -not much- yet eagerly shoulders a gun?’ In the last verse, Pope uses direct address (‘you’) to make the reader feel like she is talking to them. Also, direct address is subtle persuasion but it gets straight to the point. However Pope understates the whole concept of war which can be a kind of deception (propaganda). As we can seem, Jessie Pope’s attitude towards recruitment for war was ardent.…

    • 763 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * According to Aristotle, a tragic hero should possess some form of nobility. Evidence of this in Blanche? Note her self-presentation (she tells Stanley that she is “Virgo..the Virgin”, she claims to use expensive perfume) and she takes longer conversational turns than other characters, implying that her social power is greater than theirs .…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the poem, Into Battle, the poet, Julian Grenfell uses several techniques to convey his pro-war attitude. In this essay I will look deeper into those techniques and analyse his language use to show how he has done this, through several P.E.E.L paragraphs.…

    • 531 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Call Analysis

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The language of the poem is very clear in its message to the young male readers. She repeatedly uses rhetorical questions to evoke a sense of guilt and pressure to those who have not already enlisted for war. In stanza 2 Pope uses ‘Who’s keen on getting fit – Who means to show his grit’ to appeal to men wanting to be fit and compares war with exercise. She has made the tone very bossy and seems like its rounding the readers up and putting them on the spot and pressuring them for an answer. In stanza 1, Pope says ‘Who’s going out to win, who wants to save his skin?’ making it seem like war is a game. She adds negative lines such as ‘Who wants to save his skin?’ leaving the readers with little choice about choosing what they should do.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics