Preview

Miss

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3230 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miss
Under what circumstances, if any, does a state’s inherent right of self- defence allow it to take lawful military action before it has been subject to an armed attack? To what extent, if any, should the right of self- defence be reinterpreted to do so?

According to the Charter of the United Nations (1945) any use of force is prohibited by Article 2 (4): “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” (pg 9). However, there is an exception to this rule which is also found in the Charter of the United Nations (1945), Article 51: “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of the individual or collective self defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self- defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in anyway affect the authority on responsibility of the Security Council under the present charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain and restore international peace and security” (pg 16). It is the right to self- defence that the main issue of this essay aims to focus paying great attention as to whether it is lawful to act in self- defence to an attack that a state hasn’t yet been subject to. Due to many changes in recent years in relation to what weapons certain states or non- state actors possess and how they attack has lead to many debates on the different types of self- defence and how legislation should be interpreted to adapt to these new threats. The transformations that self- defence has witnessed are from the original right of individual or collective self defence against an armed attack



References: Antonopoulos, (2008) Charter of the United Nations (1945) Fisher, D. (1994) Franck, T Glennon, M. (2001- 2002) Gray, C Luban, D. (2003) McMahan, (2005) Reiff, M. (A) (2010) The Use of Force: Self- Defence. Found at: https://blackboard.manchester.ac.uk/webct/urw/lc5116011.tp0/cobaltMainFrame.dowebct Accessed on: 03/03/10 Reiff, M Riesman and Armstrong, (2006) Shah, N

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A law in relation to defence requires a test of proportionality, so that law-making channels are seen as being able to be “reasonably appropriate and adapted to the purpose of defence”[4]. Thus, in attempting to determine the correct application of the defence power in the current political climate, one must contemplate all facts and circumstances surrounding the threat of terrorism before coming to a conclusion. One must also look back through the history of the defence power to decipher the correct proportional means by which it is applied.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-defense: To assert this doctrine, the use of self-defense must be both necessary to avoid an imminent deadly attack and the force used must be both necessary and reasonable to avoid that deadly attack. No force can be used merely in retaliation or for revenge.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1.1 Outline how risks to health safety and security can be minimised in an organisation or service.…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wedgwood, R. (2003). The Fall of Saddam Hussein: Security Council Mandates and Preemptive Self-Defense. The American Journal of International Law , 97 (3), 576-585.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I say this because, self-defense is the defense of one’s person or interests, especially through the use of physical force. What took place on March 5, 1770 is an example of self-defense. The British troops were under serious threat by a mob of colonists who were throwing various things and screaming threats at them. In result, the British troops acted by opening fire and ended up killing five colonists. This clearly shows that the British soldiers had to take action and defend themselves. This shooting was not planned and had only took place because of how the colonists behaved. There are endless reasons why this event was an act of self-defense rather than a massacre, murder or manslaughter. Boston Massacre? More like Boston…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2.1 Equality is ensuring individuals are treated fairly and equally and no less favourably specific to their needs including areas of race, gender, disability, religion or beliefs, sexual orientation and age. Promoting equality should remove discrimination in all the affirmed areas.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Basically she points out many inconsistencies and contradictions of UN charters and resolutions on international rule of law and sovereignty, claiming that despite the fact UN recognizes all states as equal formally, still Security Council grants veto power to only five most powerful states. Also the author claims UN charters are implicit and ambiguous, or even too broad making it possible for some states to interpret these internationally accepted laws and concepts in their own interest so that to avoid conflict and criticism. She also indicates the challenge for individuals to get access to law because of the lack of mechanism, however individuals can prove theirs right through a very few means within the international system. The author uses very important and clear quotes of UN charters and descriptions regarding rule of law and sovereignty, however she fails to mention that the U.S. also should comply with international rule of…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When is war justified

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article, “When is War Justified?” by Elijah Sweete, he states that, “A defensive war is the most clearly justified and generally involves a direct attack by another nation or outside force on one’s own territory or physical assets.” Defensive wars are always fought out of the best interest of one’s nation and therefore cannot be proven unjust. A group (nation) cannot afford to be attacked by another group and respond by doing nothing. The only logical option left is to fight back in order to protect one’s assets. It may not be the most popular decision to engage in a war, but the only other alternative is to surrender and allow your assets to be taken. To fight back out of self-defense is just and must be done in order to protect one’s nation from harm. A well-known example is when America was attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor. America responded to this attack by bombing Japan and putting an end to this engagement. If America had not responded in this way, then how many more casualties would they have suffered? America’s act of self-defense revealed to Japan that they don’t want to engage in a war with America and in effect caused Japan to retreat and make peace with America.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will discuss if, and when, it is morally permissible to kill in self defence, and, in order to support my views, I will use ‘thought experiments’ from other philosophers such as Thomson, who puts across scenarios where there is an aggressor or a threat against your life (these titles will be clarified later). I will also use my own analogies, which puts you in a car facing different situations that will kill somebody in order to save another, and the ethics involved in these killings. The first of these situations is called the Non-instinctive Approach, where, when the scenario is posed, the natural reaction is to disagree. The second is the Do-Nothing Approach, where no action is taken to change the circumstances. The third is called Replacement, where bystanders replace you in the situation. Finally, there is Basic defence Approach, when you take out the threat against your life by killing those who threaten/aggressor against you. I will consider criticisms of both mine and other theories and consider any alternatives to both. Through comparing analogies of my own in contrast to the work of others, it will express my views on what makes killing morally permissible or impermissible.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    miss

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey in their work in 1993 proposed the term situational leadership; Situational leadership is the ability of the leader to adopt different styles of leadership based on the situation the leader faces. Blanchard and Heresy identified four behaviors or styles of a leader; Telling/Directing, selling/Coaching, Participating/Supporting, and Delegating. Watching the movie “Fight Club” made us understand the term of situational leadership perfectly, we could see the continuous change of Tyler’s styles of leadership through the different events in the movie. In giving clear and consistent rules he adopted the telling…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The argument for military response to civil conflict is mostly upheld by a commitment made by the member states of the United Nations in 2005. This commitments intention was to prevent war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity. This policy combined with any example of such military response, such as the offensive against Qaddafi, brings with it an international implication meant to deter such crimes from taking place. The arguments against such military response imply that such a commitment cannot be guaranteed to protect everyone in every nation around the world. This implies that though military force may be used in the name of humanitarianism, special interests are really…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Use of force

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. Imagine yourself as a lawyer—either FOR or AGAINST a US/coalition of forces’ military intervention in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    India's National Defence

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The power to defend the State against aggression is the primary responsibility of the People. Now we have to think about this problem from a truly national standpoint, for the sacred duty and responsibility rests with us, especially the younger generation.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This study is basically a research work on the role and effects of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practice Commission in curbing corruption in Nigeria.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays