Mobile Phones Using Should Be Banned in Public Places
Mobile phones became more important and convenient in human life than before, especially the sales volume of mobile phones increased 50% in China between 2000 and 2010. However, mobile phones also have different kind of bad effects to harmonious society. This essay identifies some of causes such as annoyance, interference and some disruption to prove mobile phones using should be banned in public places.
Firstly, the benefit of banning mobile phones using in public transports is avoiding the heavy annoyance. In 2006, Marrcus Ocarsson and Anthony Browne published an article inwhich argues that the government of Swedish should ban cell phones in buses, train and trams. They pointed out that “Some passengers were hypersensitive to electromagnetic fields. Others were annoyed by people shouting into phones” (Oscarsson.M and Browne.A Mobile phone to be silenced by new law, 02 June.2006). There is no doubt that people talking at the top of their voice when using the cell people is a big problem of annoyance.
Secondly, banning cell phones using in hospital might reduce the interference of instrument. Joseph J.Morrissey’s(2007) article suggested that “Many hospital reacted to concern over electromagnetic interference with critical medical equipment by implementing precautionary bans on mobile phones throughout the facility”. It proved that more people use cell phones in hospitals and nobody cares that could be dangerous. Therefore, interference from mobile phones have become a risk factor for hospitals.
Thirdly, as cheating tools, mobile phones could decline students learning atmosphere and the bad influence is more and more serious.Zach Miners(2009) report described that “students in school with cell phones admit to having stored information on them to look at during a test or texting friends about answers”. It pointed out that teens do not have self-control to use cell phones in classrooms, and they would have addiction to playing mobile phone games during
Firstly, the benefit of banning mobile phones using in public transports is avoiding the heavy annoyance. In 2006, Marrcus Ocarsson and Anthony Browne published an article inwhich argues that the government of Swedish should ban cell phones in buses, train and trams. They pointed out that “Some passengers were hypersensitive to electromagnetic fields. Others were annoyed by people shouting into phones” (Oscarsson.M and Browne.A Mobile phone to be silenced by new law, 02 June.2006). There is no doubt that people talking at the top of their voice when using the cell people is a big problem of annoyance.
Secondly, banning cell phones using in hospital might reduce the interference of instrument. Joseph J.Morrissey’s(2007) article suggested that “Many hospital reacted to concern over electromagnetic interference with critical medical equipment by implementing precautionary bans on mobile phones throughout the facility”. It proved that more people use cell phones in hospitals and nobody cares that could be dangerous. Therefore, interference from mobile phones have become a risk factor for hospitals.
Thirdly, as cheating tools, mobile phones could decline students learning atmosphere and the bad influence is more and more serious.Zach Miners(2009) report described that “students in school with cell phones admit to having stored information on them to look at during a test or texting friends about answers”. It pointed out that teens do not have self-control to use cell phones in classrooms, and they would have addiction to playing mobile phone games during
References: Oscarsson, M and Browne, A 2006, Mobile phones to be silenced by new law. The Time, viewed 26 April 2013 Joseph, J 2007 ‘Here are the standards, and the argument, to let people use cellphones in hospitals’, End the Mobile Phone Ban in Hospitals, viewed 26 April 2013 Miners, Z 2009 One Third of Teens Use Cellphones to Cheat in School, viewed 26 April 2031