In Tartuffe (1664), as in his other plays, Moliere employs classic comic devices of plot and character. Here, a foolish, stubborn father blocking the course of young love: an impudent servant commenting on her superiors’ actions; a happy ending involving a marriage facilitated by implausible means. He often uses such devices, however, to comment on his own immediate social scene, imagining how universal patterns play themselves out in a specific historical context.…
In the article “What is Schizophrenia” by Lindsey Konkel (Web), discuss the main facts on what schizophrenia is, what causes this disorder and how it affect people throughout their daily lives. Schizophrenia is a brain disorder that causes difficulty for individuals to separate what is realistic or unrealistic, such as a person’s thoughts, feelings, and/or their actions. Schizophrenia is a disorder that can affect an individual’s day-to-day performance, however; this disorder can be controlled by using the proper treatments.…
4. In Tartuffe, Moliere uses dialogue to express irony in the play. When Orgon tells his brother-in-law, “You do not know the man of whom you speak,” it is ironic because although Cleante has never met Tartuffe in person, he does know that he is deceiving everyone. It is also ironic because Orgon is saying this even though he does not know Tartuffe’s true intentions. It is also ironic when Orgon says “Under his[Tartuffe] tutelage my soul’s been freed from earthly loves, and every human tie: My mother, children, brother, and wife could die, and I’d not feel a single moment’s pain,”( 276-279) because Orgon thinks that Tartuffe has taught him to free himself of human ties including family, but in actuality, he is placing Tartuffe so ahead of his family that he no longer cares about his family.…
The novel, “Their Eyes Were Watching God”, focuses on a woman named Janie Crawford and her adventure for love and her struggle for independence. Since both of Janie’s parents were not in her life, she is forced to live with her grandmother. One day, Janie meets a boy and kisses him; this single action dictates where the rest of her life…
In Molière’s play Tartuffe, Orgon takes in a man he sees as a good Christian man, Tartuffe. This man hits on Elmire, Orgon’s wife, behind Orgon’s back and his loyalty and true character start to show. Orgon’s son, Damis witnesses the betrayal and tries to expose Tartuffe for the fraud he is, but instead Orgon banishes him for treason. The voice of reasoning in this situation is Cleante, Orgon’s brother. In Act IX, Scene 1 Cleante is questioning Tartuffe's true motives regarding Orgon’s banishing of Damis when he says to Tartuffe, “Suppose the worst for us—suppose Damis/ Acted the traitor, and accused you falsely;/ Should not a Christian pardon this offence, / And stifle in his heart all wish for vengeance? / Should you permit that, for your petty quarrel, / A son be driven from his father’s house?” Cleante seems to be the voice of reason throughout the play. When things get out of order or heated, he is the level headed voice that sees things for what they truly are. He sees that if Tartuffe was as pious of a man as he claims to be, he wouldn’t be making the situation between Orgon and Damis worse.…
The Union won the Civil War, because the North had more people able to join the war, better economic to support the war effort, the North had experience and a credit history, and larger navy then the south. The North had “97% of nation firearms” (Carnes 378). The South had 9 million people with 3.5 million of the 9 million being slaves and unable to join the army. The North had 20 million people and were able to have former slave enlist into their army. The North had bigger and better navy then the South.…
Panquette is a prostitute and has a friar as her current client. Paquette says, “That is precisely one of the agonies of this profession. Yesterday I was robbed and beaten by an officer, and today I must appear in good spirits in order to give pleasure to a monk.” A friar is normally thought of as a type of religious leader. He is immoral because he is the client of a prostitute, despite his religion. The friar is living one life, but is clearly showing his immorality in engaging in the sinful act of prostitution. Later on in the story we are introduced to an Abbe, a man who is the head of the abbey monks, another religious figure. The Abbe tricks Candide into going into a dark room thinking he would be seeing Cunegonde. However, in actuality it is a woman who works for the Abbe. Candide gives her diamonds thinking he is giving them to Cunegonde. If that wasn’t enough, then the Abbe has Candide and Martin arrested for being “suspicious foreigners”. The Abbe is more concerned about himself and his own personal wealth than his moral conduct. Earlier on in the story the old woman is attacked and says, “At last I saw all our Italian women, and then my mother, ripped and sliced and massacred by the monsters who disputed over them.” A few lines later she says, “As everyone knows, scenes like these were occurring for more than seven hundred and fifty miles around, without anyone failing to observe the daily prayers prescribed by Mohammed.” The contrast between the supposed religious devotion and immoral actions of the Old Woman’s attackers suggests a gap between religious standards and the actions of religious men. In this quote and section of the story hypocrisy is once again shown in how even these religious men who are supposed to be “Christian’s” actions do not reflect religious standards for the time period. Voltaire shows repeatedly in these three examples that…
Tartuffe is made out to be a righteous and holy man; he loses his innocence once he is framed by Elmire. “Ah! Ah! You are a traitor and a liar!, some holy man you are to wreck my life.” Tartuffe originally lost his innocence once he coveted Orgon’s wife. His pursuit for the wife turned coveting into lust. Orgon can now see that Tartuffe was not as holy as his reputation made him out to be. In fact, Tartuffe has ultimately disrespected Orgon, Elmire, and their daughter.…
Thomas Paine was one of our nations founding fathers and one of the greatest pamphleteers of all time. He was responsible for many influential writings including Common Sense, Crisis, and The Rights of Man, his response to Edmund Burke's criticism of the French Revolution. In this declaration, Paine's message is that of a need for a Republican government that understands and carries out the natural rights of all men. Paine claims that despotism such as what was in place in France before their revolution, holds the people in ignorance and degrades them. A monarchy should never be in power because they too often do not pay attention to each individuals rights.…
He declares a monk he is travelling with to be of “a fair for the maistrye” but then spends the rest of the description in demonstrating how the monk is not really of the highest value (Chaucer 165). The monk both hunts and has wealth, things a monk should not have or be doing and is to show that the church was filled with people abusing their power since religion was so important at the time and they could get away with it. In the play Everyman religion (God to be precise) had a larger role, but also a different underlying message. Unlike Sir Gawain and The Canterbury Tales, the religious part of the play is more about what values in life and what God wants from “Everyman”. The play is about how society should focus more on being religious and good instead of committing the “seven deadly sins damnable” (36). Although the message is to focus on good deeds in one’s lifetime, it comes off somewhat hypocritical, but differently than in Chaucer’s writings. Instead its focus is on what religious steps should be taken to be forgiven by God, what deeds one should focus on in life, but also shows how simple and easy it is for one to be forgiven at the very end of a…
In Frederick Douglass’s narrative, he demonstrates the ironic role of religion in southern slaveholding culture. Douglass further explains, in immense detail, in the appendix of his narrative that there is great hypocrisy within the slaveholders and their view on religion. Also in his appendix, he explains that, though most of the instances in which he mentioned religion were in negative tones, he was speaking of slaveholding religion, not of proper Christianity (Douglass 100). As for slaveholding religion, Douglass gives various examples of the hypocrisy he was subjected to, and the various ways in which slaveholders would incorrectly use religion.…
Michel de' Montaigne was a french writer of the renaissance period, many people of Montaigne's day viewed social customs and religious practices as absolutes and viewed any deviation from them as heretical. Religious leaders of the Renaissance emphasized that choosing the wrong religion meant certain damnation. Most commoners who could not read or write looked to their religious leaders for the "truth". In a time where most Europeans believed in religious and cultural absolutes, Montaigne praised the barbaric people who lived in primitive societies. In Montaigne's view, the definition of barbarism was "whatever differs from our own customs", He believed that it was his own society that was savage and not the "barbaric" people. By drawing a…
This book is copyright under the Berne Convention. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the…
Voltaire was a well known philosopher that challenged the actions of church. I agree with Voltaire challenging the church’s actions because I even question the church's actions. I agree with him because there are some doctrines that I don't agree with it. In the book it says God, the clockmaker, had created it, set it in motion, and allowed it to run without his interference and according to its own natural laws. I don’t agree with the church when they say that you have to get an annulment before getting a divorce. Voltaire says that God doesn’t have any input in what goes in those doctrines.…
Thomas Malthus first essay on population was written in 1798. The purpose of Malthus’s essay is to explore the correlations between both human population and the subsistence needed by the population. Malthus argues that “population cannot increase without the means of subsistence”. The purpose of this essay is to analyze Malthus argument and ideas to determine if there is indeed a correlation between both population and needed subsistence. Ultimately this essay will be in support of Malthus’s argument in regards to the world’s population and what is need to sustain it. Malthus explored the correlation between population and means of subsistence to directly argue against William Godwin, who was in support of a more “egalitarian society and…