issue that bothers me about the butterflies is that in Mexico many of the Mexicans live in poverty. So they need those trees for houses. Many of them live is little hut like shacks. I know I may sound like I don’t care about the butterflies but a persons well being to me is much more important than a butterfly. Not only do they use the wood for housing but for fire and cooking needs. Those people agreed to give up logging rights to the forest so they would be able to survive. In conclusion, if you were in there predicament what would you choose to do? Would you choose to ban logging so the monarch butterflies would have a place to nest and live? Or would you choose to allow logging so you would have a house to live in, wood for heat, and food? I think the choice would be easier if someone was in their shoes. It’s easy to just agree with everyone and want to save the butterflies but when it comes to a persons live I would have to choose economy instead of ecology.
issue that bothers me about the butterflies is that in Mexico many of the Mexicans live in poverty. So they need those trees for houses. Many of them live is little hut like shacks. I know I may sound like I don’t care about the butterflies but a persons well being to me is much more important than a butterfly. Not only do they use the wood for housing but for fire and cooking needs. Those people agreed to give up logging rights to the forest so they would be able to survive. In conclusion, if you were in there predicament what would you choose to do? Would you choose to ban logging so the monarch butterflies would have a place to nest and live? Or would you choose to allow logging so you would have a house to live in, wood for heat, and food? I think the choice would be easier if someone was in their shoes. It’s easy to just agree with everyone and want to save the butterflies but when it comes to a persons live I would have to choose economy instead of ecology.