Preview

Monarchical Abuse And Tyranny: The Last Roman Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
726 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monarchical Abuse And Tyranny: The Last Roman Republic
In the late 6th century BCE, the small city-state of Rome overthrew the shackles of monarchy and created a republican government (Donald L, 2016). In theory, if not always in practice, represents the wishes of its citizens. The establishment of the Roman Republic in 509 BCE was a result of several key circumstances: 1. Monarchical Abuse and Tyranny: The last Roman king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (Tarquin the Proud), was known for his oppressive rule and the abuse of power (Donald L, 2016). His tyranny and the discontent it caused among the Roman nobility and commoners contributed significantly to the desire for change. 2. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Revolt against the Monarchy: The immediate trigger for the establishment …show more content…
This revolt resulted in the expulsion of Tarquin and his family from Rome. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Desire for Political Reform: The Roman aristocracy sought to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual. They aimed to create a system of government where power was distributed more broadly among the elite, ensuring a more balanced and less autocratic rule (Donald L, 2016). The culmination of these factors led to the abolition of the monarchy and the creation of the Roman Republic, characterized by a complex system of elected magistrates, a Senate, and popular assemblies, designed to prevent the rise of another tyrant and to balance power among Rome's social …show more content…
These elements are included in the. Popular Assemblies: The Roman Republic featured various assemblies where citizens could vote on laws and elect officials. The most important of these were: - Comitia Centuriata: Organized by military units (centuries), it elected senior magistrates like consuls and praetors and voted on important issues like war and peace (Shiffer M., 2021) - Comitia Tributa: Organized by tribes, it elected lower magistrates and had legislative and judicial powers (Shiffer M., 2021). Concilium Plebis: An assembly exclusive to plebeians, which elected the Tribunes of the Plebs and passed laws affecting the entire Republic (Shiffer M., 2021). 2. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Elected Magistrates: Key political positions were filled through elections, including Consuls. The two chief executives are elected annually. Praetors : Officials who primarily handle judicial matters. Aediles: Responsible for public works and games. Quaestors: Managed financial affairs. Triunes of the Plebs: Represented the interests of the plebeians and had significant power to veto actions by other magistrates. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Legal Framework: The Twelve Tables (c. 450 BCE) provided a written code of laws accessible to all citizens (Shiffer M., 2021). Laying the groundwork for a more
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comparison of Roman Empire to Han Dynasty Essay Example
    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparison of Roman Empire to Han Dynasty Essay Example

    The Roman republic allowed all citizens to meet in assemblies to elect magis-trates. The most important legislative body was the Senate,…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare and Contrast Greece and Rome
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Greece and Rome

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain The Reasons Why Romans Expel The Last King Tarquinius
    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page

    Explain The Reasons Why Romans Expel The Last King Tarquinius

    During the time of kings, Roman “aristocracy" the patricians were mostly unhappy. They wanted to have control over the government and did not like much the dominating them king post. So that was one of the main reasons why Romans expel their last king Tarquinius Superbus (Tarquin the Proud). Following that to prevent in future plausible concentration of power in the hands of only one person they developed new system that grant post and governing and military power into the hands of two elected for a term not longer than one year magistrates – named: “consuls”.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Corruption Of Tiberius Gracchus Power In Ancient Rome
    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Corruption Of Tiberius Gracchus Power In Ancient Rome

    In 133 BC, Rome faced the problem of depopulation and decreasing military service. This problem arose when most of the undistributed land fell into the hands of the rich who continued to use unlawful methods to take possession of lands near their own or lands that belonged to the poor so that they could have bigger farms. A large number of slaves were employed to work on the lands and for this, the rich continued to gain wealth and power (Appian. R. Hist. Ex. 7). Even though the Romans were worried about the large number of slaves and diminishing number of armies, reformation was not considered as it was not easy or fair to them (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 8). This was until a noble man named Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus became…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change
    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Sparta Change

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Lynn Hunt: The Fall Of The Roman Republic
    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lynn Hunt: The Fall Of The Roman Republic

    The Fall of the Roman Republic Lynn Hunt’s analysis of the Roman Republic is far more compelling than Polybius’s. Although Polybius writes concisely about the individual institutions within the Roman Republic and how they overlap, he superimposes his mixed constitution bias as his analysis seems more focused on the theoretical outline available in the constitution. On the other hand, Hunt is not so strictly tied to the constitutional ideas of the institutions and explores how in practice they have evolved and deviated from the attributes and responsibilities originally constructed in the Roman constitution.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Rome Fell
    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Rome Fell

    As the saying goes, “Rome was not built in a day.” The decline of Rome can attribute a similar statement, that is, Rome was not destroyed in a day. The fall of Rome can be traced back to the time when Rome was a republic and Julius Caesar marched his legions into the city itself and took control as a dictator. This act alone caused rifts within the Roman ruling class that would echo for generations. The rise of the Emperor replaced the republic and the Emperor himself began to become worshipped as a deity among the traditional pagan beliefs of Roman citizenry. The vast expanse of land that the Roman Empire amassed became difficult to manage by the centralized rule of the Emperor. This led to the governing of the outlying provinces to individual governors, who at times were more interested in their own prosperity than of the prosperity of the Empire. The governors’ own political initiatives led to the Emperor losing his power in the outlying provinces. An example of this is the Roman governors Vindex and Galba, who during the reign of Emperor Nero revolted against the central government. Vindex supported Galba in his bid to overthrow Nero in order to pursue Vindex’s own political prowess under Galba’s new regime. (Donahue, 1999) Revolts such as this one illustrate how people who are distanced from the central government find it difficult to be ruled by them. It is interesting to see that both Vindex and Galba were from the far reaches of the Roman…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Roman Republic Fall
    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did Roman Republic Fall

    The Roman Republic was the major stronghold for centuries. Encompassing the Mediterranean and much of Europe, and even having influence throughout Egypt and beyond, it was well understood that Rome was not to be messed with. No civilization could ever topple such a well-organized and technologically advanced society such as Rome. No civilization, that is, other than its own self. Pride, revenge, and greed influenced key decisions that pried at the few loose ends that Rome had. Generals, soldiers, and the Senate alike destroyed the foundations on which the Roman Republic was built on, and the nation collapsed from the inside out. In a perfect world, Rome had an…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Roman Republic's Demise?
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did The Roman Republic's Demise?

    Numerous reasons contributed to the complicated process of the Roman Republic's demise. But if we were to pinpoint one thing that contributed more to its downfall than the other, it would be the Roman elite's growing inclination toward personal ambition and the breakdown of political institutions. This element ultimately contributed to the Republic's demise by undermining the checks and balances that were essential to its operation (Bobertz, 2022). A fundamental characteristic of the Roman Republic was its form of governance, which aimed to avoid the consolidation of authority into the hands of a solitary figure. With a Senate that provided advice to the consuls, many assemblies representing diverse societal groups, and two consuls sharing executive authority, the Republic included a…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Roman Republic Have Its Own Form Of Democracy
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The Roman Republic Have Its Own Form Of Democracy

    One branch was called the Consuls and they were the supreme masters of the government. The second one was the Senate and they proposed laws and had control over the treasury. Lastly there was the Assemblies which was completely made up of the people. Citizens were allowed to vote on who made up the Assemblies, so they essentially voted on who would vote for them. In the Roman Republic, there were two types of citizens that made…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws
    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roman Empire Flaws

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Does Being An American Mean
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Does Being An American Mean

    Being an American means that everyone is treated equally no matter what race or skin color someone has. Also being an American means that you have the right and freedom to do anything that you want to do. If you are American people look up to you to see if you are doing the right things you should be doing and also doing things to help people or your community. One thing about being American is that you can live your life to the fullest. Another thing that Americans do is that they tend to capture the beauty in everyday life. Lastly, if you are an American you should have pride in the country that you live…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Disobedience
    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Civil Disobedience

    The voice of modern society can be heard through civil disobedience. People all around the world has encountered or even experienced protest against an issue in his or her own country. Throughout history and even today, it has been one of the only ways people can persuade the government to resolve a problem. Some of the key points that Henry David Thoreau states in On the Duty of Civil Disobedience are applicable to modern-day societies that people have the right to resist, should and must practice integrity, and attempt to attain a just, limited government.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    The Business Value of Information Systems. Case Study: Amazon.Com
    • 4021 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Business Value of Information Systems. Case Study: Amazon.Com

    Business information management requires the use of information systems, which make possible the conversion of data into useful information to be used by decision makers in organisations (Chaffey, 2004) The acquisition and further deployment of such systems requires organisations to make expensive investments prior to know whether they are going to produce the desired business improvements. Therefore, delivering value for money from information systems investments has become a very serious issue for many organisations. There are several examples in both the private and public sector of expensive failures, but there are fewer…

    • 4021 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More