Preview

Monopolies In The Antitrust Industry

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
715 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monopolies In The Antitrust Industry
American Monopolies
This short article by Douglas A. McIntyre paints a very good picture of how many of the American Technologies companies are pure monopolies within this industry. McIntyre opens this article by saying “A monopoly is either what the government says it is or what a dominant company’s competitors claim. The Governments opinion is the only one that counts….” (McIntyre, 2012). McIntyre then mentioned that there was this Act that prohibits businesses from activities that are found to be anticompetitive that is called the 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act. After seeing this, I was curious of what was the true meaning behind this Act and after a few searches I found that according to Wikipedia, “The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark
…show more content…
It was the first federal statute to limit cartels and monopolies, and today still forms the basis for most antitrust litigation by the United States federal government.” (Wikipedia 2013). After learning that such Act is in place, I now see why there are not very many true monopolies, meaning that they own 100% of the market and how the government has a say in how companies are ran. In my opinion, I honestly feel that is a very beneficial law to have in the books because it gives an entrepreneur or another business a fair chance at entering a chosen market. But on the other hand, it’d only be smart to enter a market that you honestly feel you have a chance to survive in, or you’d only be setting yourself up for failure. Anyhow, McIntyre goes on to provide a list called the “New Generation of American Monopolies” which is a list of all the biggest companies in the technology industry that control the markets in their respective produce. Not to my surprise of the many big names on this list, in which most reside in the Silicon Valley like Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Intel, Apple and even Paypal. Most of these are more of an Oligopoly, meaning they share the market, except for one that was of a surprise to me which was Sirius XM satellite radio simply for the fact that this company was the only true monopoly …show more content…
But maybe I didn’t think of this because they have absolutely zero competition. After a little more research on wikipedia, I found that back in the early 2000’s there was a little competition between two different satellite companies, XM and Sirius, but due to the money that it takes to keep satellites in orbit, the two realized that the only way they’d both survive was to merge, so in 2007 they did (Wikipedia). I truly found this article really interesting because it was broke down into each product,(i.e. search engine, operations system, social media sites, digital video streaming, microchips, tablet computer and even e-readers) and then explained why each of the top companies where so dominant. Some were there because of the sheer size of their company and others made it just because they made a better produce which made for a higher demand of that produce in which pinched out the competition. To just give a few of the examples, Google controls 90.1% of the search engine market over Yahoo and Bing, Microsoft controls 89.7% of the windows operating systems over Mac OS X and Linux, Intel controls 80.3% of the microchips market over AMD, and Apple iPad controls 73% of the market over

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    An additional issue is what does “active market participant” mean? The Court defined it as someone “who possess singularly strong private interests.” In this case, that appears to mean someone who works in the industry and has an interest in limiting competition in the industry. In summary, the Supreme Court did not make it clear what “controlled by active market participants” meant in the decision, and therefore that is likely to be a major point of contention going forward. As will be discussed later, the FTC guidance will likely serve as a major source of information on this…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Major League Baseball (“MLB”) is the only American Industry that is a self-regulating monopoly exempt from anti-trust law. In 1922, there was the U.S. Supreme Court Case of Federal Baseball Club v. National League and the judge unanimously decided that the Sherman Antitrust Act was not applicable to MLB and could therefore regulate as a monopoly. Furthermore, this decision was later reaffirmed in 1952 and 1972 in two different U.S. Supreme Court cases. This antitrust exemption has given increased monopolistic power to the MLB organization.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Department of Justice pursues cases dealing with many aspects of the United States law system. One portion that they deal with is violations with the Antitrust laws. Anti trust laws were established to help the consumers and create competition, which create lower prices for products and services (Department of Justice, 2017 ). One of the three Antitrust Acts, the Sherman Act outlaws monopolies. There are currently two cases the Justice Department is working with that deal with monopolies, AMC’s acquisition of Carmike Cinemas and Foreign Exchange Dealers coming together to commit a Conspiracy. Both cases are interesting and have everything to do with anticompetitive behaviors leading to taking over a market.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Large corporations began to form monopolies in the 1800s. Competition helps the economy, by allowing the control of products and prices. However, in a monopoly there is only one seller of the product. Monopolies may cause prices to increase greatly, but only the corporation benefits. In order to seize control of large corporations was to form a trust. The federal government passes a series of antitrust laws in order to have a successful economy.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “...Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies.” (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 article) The election offered voters several choices: Wilson’s New Freedom, Taft’s conservatism, Roosevelt’s Progressivism, or the Socialist Party policies of Eugene V. Debbs. Clayton act prohibits corporations from acquiring stock of another if doing so would create monopolies. Wilson turned his attention to financial reform when the nation needed a way to strengthen the ways in which banks ran, as well as a way to swiftly adjust amount of money in circulation. Clayton Antitrust Act, a federal law that did away with monopolies and unfair businesses, passed by President Wilson.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antitrust laws were adopted by Congress to outlaw or restrict business practices that were considered to be monopolistic or which restrained interstate commerce.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 4 main pieces of legislation that are collectively known as the Anti-trust laws. They are the Sherman Antitrust Act, The Federal Trade commission Act, The Clayton Antitrust Act and the Celler-Kefauver Act. The Sherman Antitrust Act is legislation enacted to protect Americans against monopolies. It makes it illegal to make contracts or conspire to restrict trade or commerce. It also outlaws monopolies. The Federal Trade Commission Act established the Federal Trade Commission and set up how it would be run, with a group of 5 people that did not follow party lines that would be chosen for 7 years terms and would make sure no antitrust laws were being broken. The Clayton Antitrust Law closed a lot of the loopholes that the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressives had beliefs such as industrialization and urbanization had created troubling social and political problems. Progressives wanted to bring about reforms that would correct what they saw as problems and injustices. The Antitrust Laws were designed to prevent and punish anti-competitive practices. Progressives complained that the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was inadequate and ineffective in limiting the abuses of big businesses. The Progressives made states pass the antitrust laws to make cartels and monopolistic practices illegal and to regulate railroad rates.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe that the banks are not acting in a responsible fashion with their solicitation of consumers for credit cards and credit card lines. As mentioned in the article, the banks are advertising "promotions of credit card and debt to increase limits" in an attempt to gather additional consumers. I think by advertising these credit cards to college and high school students, and then providing them with higher credit limits and promotions, the banks are aiming to increase the number of irresponsible spenders in today's society to make money.…

    • 3370 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Progressive Era, the theory Social Darwinism was a belief conceived by many individuals. This theory was created after the philosopher Charles Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest. Social Darwinism is a theory stating that every individual must compete against each other in order to achieve success. This theory message states that a person should take any necessary action to earn the highest income possible. Followers of this theory, including Andrew Carnegie, used this theory as fuel and became wealthy, greedy businessmen. Laissez-faire believers did not like this theory. They believed it caused corruption, and influenced people that there is a “sink or swim” economy. Railroad managers displayed little interest for patents. Many railroads manufactured most of their equipment and try to stay away from conflict with two patented items. At the time, because of the lack of different models of patents, thus infringement cases remained low. By the 1860’s, several railroads such as New York Central, The Baltimore Chicago, and Ohio .expanded and became more technologically advanced. More equipment were being used which made monopolies and other corporations vulnerable to infringement. People used this opportunity to try to receive large settlements from corporations for a corporation using a product that an inventor created. As time progressed, railroad technologies began being controlled by Corporate Research. The Federal Government and Corporations conflicted more, In Conclusion, Industrialization led to Monopolies, the railroad industry, and patents being used for corruption. Monopolies damaged the economy and caused fraud. Business owners became money hungry, and abused their control over the market such as overpricing goods and causing other related businesses to…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopoly Vs Monopoly

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not everyone has a “get out of jail free” card in life; unless of course they are playing the classic family board game, Monopoly. Those who monopolize a specific market most definitely do not have a “get out of jail free” card, as they are committing felonies. Both of these different monopolies are a great pleasure to win, but a pain to lose. In this paper I will compare and contrast these two different forms of monopolization.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egt1 Task 3

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1914 the Clayton Act made it illegal for companies to be involved in certain practices, but was meant more at disassembling current monopolies. The 4 key segments within this act are proposed to accentuate the Sherman Act. The first (Section 2) made pricing discrimination unlawful when not justified on the basis of cost differences and/or it decreases competition. The second (Section 3) bans binding contracts, when a manufacturer imposes that a buyer purchases additional goods/products as a condition for procuring a desired good/product. The third (Section 7) bans the purchase of stocks of a competing business when the result would be weaken the rivalry or competition. Lastly (Section 8) bans the circumstances where a director of one business is also a board member of a competing business in an effort to reduce competition. (McConnell, 2012)…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These laws and regulations are protecting the consumers and employees of America. The FTC will audit any company or individual whom goes against these laws. Obviously for some time now anti-trust laws have had a huge impact in America.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust laws are intended to protect, promote competition and to push industry profits towards competitive floor in order to resist market dominance. Porter’s five forces model reflects that an industry has absolute market power if threat of entrants and substitutes are low along with weak bargaining power among suppliers and buyers, and if industry is not competitive.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays