Monster In Frankenstein
The Monster in Shelley's “Frankenstein” is a unique character that can be perceived in numerous ways, he can be portrayed as heinous and horrid, or he could be portrayed as misunderstood and humane. However, it is up to the reader to discern the Monster’s true nature and whether or not his intentions throughout the story align with his actions. In chapter 5 when the Monster comes to life, Victor gives the reader a vivid description of the physical characteristics of the Monster saying that “His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of
…show more content…
Even after all that, the humiliating encounters with people, learning how ugly he truly is in a reflection, and learning how his own creator feels about him the Monster still saves a young girl from drowning in a river. That alone shows the good heart that the Monster has, he has been neglected by everyone but still risks his own life to save a stranger, most normal people are not willing to do that. Sadly, the Monster’s good deed is misread and he is shot in the shoulder and runs away. Even though the Monster was saving her he ended being misjudged just because of his physical appearance and ended up getting wounded, which shows that good action can be easily misread just by judging blindly. Another important issue in the book is the fact that the Monster does not have a name, people call it “Frankenstein” because of Hollywood but Shelley never gave the Monster a real name. We give our pets name, even our cars, so the fact that Shelley did not give the Monster a name is important because maybe she is trying to depict that in Victor and the people's eyes the Monster is really below everything. Overlooking the fact that the Monster killed Victor’s brother, the Monster has proven to have a good nature and he has the right intentions. The Monster had the power to kill anyone he wanted, he even stated, “I could with pleasure have destroyed the cottage and its inhabitants and have glutted myself with their shrieks and misery." which is very true, but he did not do that instead he helped the inhabitants by getting them firewood and food which is more proof that the Monster has a true nature and he has the good
Even after all that, the humiliating encounters with people, learning how ugly he truly is in a reflection, and learning how his own creator feels about him the Monster still saves a young girl from drowning in a river. That alone shows the good heart that the Monster has, he has been neglected by everyone but still risks his own life to save a stranger, most normal people are not willing to do that. Sadly, the Monster’s good deed is misread and he is shot in the shoulder and runs away. Even though the Monster was saving her he ended being misjudged just because of his physical appearance and ended up getting wounded, which shows that good action can be easily misread just by judging blindly. Another important issue in the book is the fact that the Monster does not have a name, people call it “Frankenstein” because of Hollywood but Shelley never gave the Monster a real name. We give our pets name, even our cars, so the fact that Shelley did not give the Monster a name is important because maybe she is trying to depict that in Victor and the people's eyes the Monster is really below everything. Overlooking the fact that the Monster killed Victor’s brother, the Monster has proven to have a good nature and he has the right intentions. The Monster had the power to kill anyone he wanted, he even stated, “I could with pleasure have destroyed the cottage and its inhabitants and have glutted myself with their shrieks and misery." which is very true, but he did not do that instead he helped the inhabitants by getting them firewood and food which is more proof that the Monster has a true nature and he has the good