Preview

Montesquieu's Persian Letters And The Spirit Of Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
649 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Montesquieu's Persian Letters And The Spirit Of Law
Baron de Montesquieu was a highly influential political philosopher who lived during the 17th and 18th centuries. Through observations of many different civilizations in his travels all around Europe, he was able to formulate revolutionary ideas and theories about politics and government that still affect the world to this day. In his works, Montesquieu highlighted what he believed was wrong with society at the time, explained different governmental systems and their individual characteristics, and theorized how a government could be made to be as well-functioning and efficient as possible. Overall, the works and ideas of Montesquieu, in addition to having a large effect on Europe during his time, inspired later philosophers and influenced …show more content…
In Persian Letters, Montesquieu tells the story of two Persians who travel to Europe and react to the institutions and customs they find there. The entire book is written through a series of letters written by these two Persians and people they know back home. The novel is very satirical as it pokes fun at very popular customs and activities performed by most Europeans by having the Persians either misunderstand them or find them peculiar. It also makes fun of established people and institutions, such as the Catholic Church, Louis XIV, and French social classes. The major themes of this book are that absolute power is a bad and inhumane type of government, that having a good and fair government depends on having virtuous citizens, the importance of religious freedom, the differences between Europe and other continents, the pros and cons of different types of governments, and the function of law in society. In this book, Montesquieu expresses his ideas about the best type of government, saying that it should be able to complete its function with as much ease as possible and govern the people based on their culture and morals. He also thinks that legal reform should only be done in dire circumstances as it can have dangerous consequences, but acknowledges that just laws are very important to society. Overall, Persian Letters was a very successful book that discussed important issues in European society and ways to fix them. Because of this, it brought Montesquieu great fame and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron de Montesquieu was one of the greatest intellectuals in the Enlightenment Era. He had many good ideas about the world and how it works I say this because of his ideas of separation of power. Separation of power is when the executive, legislative and judicial powers of the government limit and control each other in a checks and balances system. Because each branch prevents the other from gaining too much power The state will have lasting freedom and strength. Our country has used this principle for the past 200 years, and we have remained strong. We have had no major rebellion against our leaders, save one, and we have remained a militarily and economically powerful country. And that is why I agree with…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baron de Montesquieu also touches on the definition of a democracy, drawing inspiration form the Roman structure, “the body of people is possessed of the supreme power.” In The Spirt of Laws he also touches on the fact that similarities to Roman punishments enlighten other governments similarities to that of Rome. John Locke also touches on this separation of powers labeling then differently in The Two Treaties of Civil Government labeling then as legislative, executive, and federative…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main push given towards a new perspective of government and society was by another product of the Enlightenment, the American Revolution. Enlightenment thinking was already affecting France when the American Revolution broke out, but as historian Lord Acton suggested the state of French society was consistently awful and it was only by exposure to the American’s success at revolt that the French Revolution took off. In summary, the French Revolution was only a reality because the American Revolution inspired radicals and proved that the people had the ability to change their…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his 1755 discourse on 'The Origins of Inequality', Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues his conception of the natural state of mankind, and its subsequent corruption throughout the progress towards civil society. Whilst Rousseau's idealism can be targeted as unrealistic, and his criticisms of the state potentially destabilising to certain societies, ultimately he makes a valid philosophical argument against tyranny which helps found republican political values.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The "Persian Letters" (Letters XI - XIV) illustrate a classic question in philosophical thought: is man meant to live life by desire or virtue, and what happens if either case is taken to an extreme. Montesquieu illustrates this in letters written by Usbek to Mirza, and a story of a clan of Troglodytes who have created a city (so to speak) first ruled by their own desires as individuals (or their own selfish desires) and then through time, come to live by virtue, and later an attempt at the formation of a government - where the story ends.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period surrounding the Revolutionary War philosophically drew from the philosophies of J. Locke and C. Montesquieu. Both men wrote on the origin, need and extent of governments in their time, and created the basis for the liberal form of government. When the Articles of Confederation are compared to the individual philosophies of these two men, the Articles of Confederation proved an ineffective government economically speaking.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time, the ideas of democracy have changed with the help of many philosophers. Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu and Rousseau were four of the most important founders of the ideals of democracy. Through the Enlightenment Period, these thinkers began creating new ideas that would forever change the way governments are run through time. Our own American government reflects the ideas in some way or another of each of the philosophers we studied. Through new ideas, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau and Montesquieu all changed the way government was run with the innovative ideas they created.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montesquieu came up with the separation of powers. He got this idea from Locke and Aristotle. He said that in order to have a successful…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Baron de Montesquieu’s work “The Spirit of the Laws” he states that when common people adopt good maximums they adhere to them more steadily. This is a process of thinking for the Enlightenment movement because it is using reason to see what would be the most effective form of government. This Enlightenment movement became increasingly popular in the mid 18th century because many people felt that reason should be used in creating and running the government. This resulted in people looking to the Bible for guidance, which tied to the Great Awakening movement, and also gave birth to republican ideals.Republican ideals were a product of people using critial thinking in the Englightnement movement to solve pressing problems that society faced.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enlightenment Outline

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the spirit of the Law, Montesquieu proposed limited monarchy, checks and balances in gov’t, and a separation of powers.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussions brought up by thinkers such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau encouraged the political revolutionaries in the development of the birth of the rights of a man, beliefs of equality, freedoms, and liberalism. Along with it came the arrival of the “self-made” man, referring to the embracing of liberty of the individual and accepting radical views, creating another conflict with the values upheld by the monarchy.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The late 1700's were a period of great social and political revolution in Western civilization. The French Revolution was a major part of this sweeping change in the way Europeans (and the newborn Americans) perceived the function of government and the most effective ways of governing. The French Revolution had many long term and short term causes and effects, and was one of the most violent periods in the history of the country. There were many factors that contributed to the spark of the revolution. There were three main causes of the French Revolution: gross mishandling of governing duties and incompetence in the leadership of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the large and very unjust social and economic gap between the first two privileged estates and the poor third estate, and finally the revolutionary ideas of the enlightenment and their influence on the philosophies of the people.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book L’Ingenu by Voltaire is bursting with corruption of the soul. Lying, manipulating, and bribery are the center of religion, politics, and social society. These issues are expressed very harshly by Voltaire in this book. Voltaire ties to enlighten the people of his day by shedding light on these issues and start a changing in the world. Along with religion, he focuses upon political, social, and cultural factors to describe how he feels about the 18th Century French society.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three years later in 1716 his uncle died and left all his wealth and fortune, his office as president of the Bordeaux Parliament, and again his title of Baron de Montesquieu to Charles. In between the 1715 and the 1716 Charles Louis married Jeanne de Laritgue, a Protestant who was a member of the church where he had left the rule of Roman Catholicism. He became famous with his PERSIAN LETTERS in 1721 and then became even more famous with his ON THE SPIRIT OF LAWS IN 1748. Charles had this weird belief that all things had an order and those orders had to be followed. Through his studies he decided to study more carefully and scientifically the orders of government in order to see if that help reduce the problems in society and improve human life. He discovered three types of government; monarchy which was ruled by a royal as in a king or queen, republic which was ruled by an elected leader, and last but not least a despotism which was ruled by a dictator. Montesquieu said that although there were those type of governments the best one was the one where people would their own government. In my opinion a democracy is way better because people choose the people they want to represent them and guide…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Of Enlightenment

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gradually, complaints in the salons and coffee shops changed from idle whining into constructive political thought. They began to discuss substantive political and social philosophies of the day, and before long the French Enlightenment was born. From here, many highly influential political thinkers emerged during the Enlightenment. One of those was Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède and de Montesquieu. He was a political philosopher famous for his articulation of the theory of separation of powers, which is implemented in many constitutions around the world. Through his education and travels he became a sharp social commentator and thinker who gained the respect of his fellow philosophers with his masterwork The Spirit of Laws, which went on to have a major influence on English and American government. It was also during this time that the philosophes were denouncing Christianity with their nontraditional ways of thinking. They attacked the Church’s traditional idea of the “chain of being,” which implied a natural hierarchy of existence, and believed in a universe that was set in autonomous motion and never tampered with again. The philosophes also raised objections against the decadent lifestyles of leading Church representatives, as well as the Church’s persistence in…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays