Preview

Moral Christian Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Christian Theory
ANALYSIS OF CASE STUDY: FETAL ABNORMALITY
GRANCANYON UNIVERSITY
KIRPAL SINGH
June 7, 2015

In the case by Jessica, Marco, Maria and Dr.William I believe that the theory they have used for this case study is the Moral Christian theory which says that it is god almighty who gave origin to us and knitted us in our mother’s womb from where all our lives have a meaning. Therefore in my opinion I feel that Jessica’s and Maria’s decision is wright about knitting the baby and go for the plan of god as god always have an intention in his every which shows a close resemblance to the moral standpoint of Christianity. The children with disability can also survive in this world. Jessica in this case as a strong believer of God
…show more content…

The bible says a lot of good things about the humanism and the positive qualities have human beings should possess in order to get close to god. ‘’For you created my inmost being, you knit me together in my mother’s womb” I shall praise you for my entire life because you are the God of this entire universe wonderfully made, all your works in this entire universe is beautiful and for a reason, knowing the full well. There was nothing about me which was hidden from you when I was framed in the secret place, you woven me together in the depths of earth. You have seen my unformed body and all my days on this earth are written in your book even before I was sent to this earth (Psalms 139:13-16). Those who are intended to go for the materialistic life on this earth, In this case study if they would have gone for abortion which is a materialistic or selfish way of thinking is against the word of god. Jessica’s and Maria’s decision for keeping the baby as the intention of god is derived from their strong belief in the god. A fetus formed in a mother’s womb despite of its abnormalities is still a human being and doing abortion is a sin. Here dr.Wilson and Marco is having a materialistic mortal viewpoint as they wants to do the abortion of the baby, everything that humans possess in this world are just physical in this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Buie’s reasoning in support of his claim is his brother Jon who was mentally disabled and the effect he had on his family. The author’s use of evidence was limited because he chose to only give only two examples which were his own personal experiences and one law. The writer tries to seem credible by using person experience’s in his article. Mr. Buie presented contradictory points by giving information on how disabilities can be detected within the first trimester of a pregnancy. If this information is accurate there would not be a need for late term abortion in relation to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A couple filed a court case against doctors, technicians, and any one health related who gave them a misdiagnosis of their son Bryan Mejia in Palm Beach County in September of 2011. Mejia was born without limbs and no one informed the parents about the issue at hand during the pregnancy. If the parents would have known that their child would be born with disabilities then they would have aborted their child in the beginning of them pregnancy. According to Klaire & Heffernan:…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wilson he has demonstrated the ways of the human property theory to determine the moral status of the fetus. Dr.Wilson looked at the situation from a doctor’s point of view by suggesting an abortion based on scientific and medical means. The human property theory influenced Dr.Wilson’s greatly in my opinion. “Some of the characteristics that would give a being with moral status under this view would include things like, being conceived from human parents, or having a human genetic code, or the features of a human (physical human characteristics). And since the baby will be born without arms, the doctor might have found it just to abort the baby since it lacks the physical human characteristics of arms. However, if the baby were to be born with arms and just have down syndrome I’m sure the doctor would not be for abortion since there are babies born with down…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though the author has sort of a harsh attitude toward the subject, I can very well understand why. It helps her get her point across and still keep the audiences attention. She tries to gain sympathy when she starts to explain the incident at the dinner table; a guest was answering a question asked by another guest and he said that he believes it is a moral obligation to terminate the pregnancy to avoid bringing forth a child with disability’s. He claims that it is better for the child, so he or she did not have to suffer. But in society these days if you think about it, down syndrome children have there own things, things made just for them, so they can have a life like every other…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does it stop here or next do we start genetically modifying embryos so they are taller or smarter or faster. If genetic modifying is used too freely, many problems can arise. In some countries, couples may start to use it to select a certain gender, leading to an extremely uneven gender balance. The ethical side of this is that society strides for a “perfect society” and “perfect babies” and by genetically modifying babies it shows society’s intolerant attitude for the disabled. The disabled greatly resent the fact that people would genetically modify their child to fit society’s view. Society may feel that a deaf person may not led as fulfilling of a life as a hearing person. The disabled community is completely against this view. As it is, deaf students are a lot less likely than blind students to attempt to overcome their respective disability. The deaf students embrace their disability and immerse themselves into their surrounding and supportive community. Someone who is not a part of the deaf community cannot understand the deaf culture. This clinic believes that a hearing person is incapable of seeing this from a deaf persons perspective, while a deaf person is unable to see this from a hearing persons…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Christian Sociological parts, have influenced each other in the past. Christian churches in U.S. society still maintain importance because "approximately 80 percent of Americans...identify themselves as Christian; many of the new immigrants in fact are Christian, e.g., those from Haiti, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Central America" (Caiazza, 2010, p. 190). In terms of their role in the Christian Sociological model, Stuckenberg (1880) holds that the individual "in society is a representative of Christ and of" the "Gospel" (Matt. 5:13-15) where their testimony leads the world to judge Christianity (p. 266). Their "conduct before others should be in harmony with his true worth and dignity" (Stuchenberg, 1880, p. 267). At furthest sacrifice, "the…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patricia E.Bauer is an American former reporter, and the current bureau chief for Washington post. In her article “The Abortion Debate No One Wants to Have”, Bauer expounds on some of those in the general public who have no sympathy and are unconcerned about the connection between children’s with down syndrome and abortion. As the mother of a young beautiful girl with a disability, she expresses the eternal love she has for her child and the pain she has to go through when a not as much as thoroughly considered remark or question about Margaret is coordinated at her. She discusses the accomplishments that Margaret has achieved and the delight that she brings to the rest of the family. Even though, this article is very well elaborated but there’s quite a few critical thinking barriers that are present.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christian Moral Theology engages questions and issues that invite discussion and interpretation of convictions through lenses of theology, using The Bible as one of its chief sources. It involves examination of perspectives through sociology, history, religion, ethics, policy, politics, ecclesiology, ideology, law, culture, and societal expectations and standards. This paper will focus on answering the question if Christians should desire happiness or not, and if they should, what are the reasons for their doing. Furthermore, the paper will include class lectures and course readings.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our worldviews are redefined over time, and that worldview dictates how we react and interact with the world around us. It becomes particularly important when faced with any ethical dilemmas. When we are faced with a dilemma that challenges our ability to uphold our worldview, it either strengthens our resolve or requires a reevaluation of what that worldview is. The abortion dilemma bellow will be used to examine how a Christian worldview would resolve an ethical dilemma and compare that resolution to my own worldview…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "…the interests of the fetus do not really enter into it. This is exactly as it should be. It is the woman, after all, who has to take responsibility for the child after it has been born, and so only she is in a position to determine whether or not she is able or prepared to take the strain involved in rearing a severely handicapped child." Bradley (1995).…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue Ethical Theory

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that virtue ethics is the most plausible ethical theory. It is the only theory that requires us to work better ourselves by cultivating virtues instead of giving a law to follow or because we value the outcomes. In addition, with today’s society being self-centered it is the theory that has the best chances of being accepted. A virtue is defined as the mean between the extremely good and extremely bad and arriving to that just middle take time, dedication, and patience. One does not own a virtue but a virtue defines who one is. Dedicating a lifetime to become better versions of ourselves is what we are already doing and virtue ethics is the theory with the path towards it.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Ethics

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for a society?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality In Religion

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The definition of religion as taught to me in class is bind or to come together. There are many religions that are practiced worldwide. They have different histories, adherents, Gods, meanings of life, afterlife beliefs, practices, and books containing text that guides them through their spiritual journey. From Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, to Islamism, Judaism, and Rastafarianism, etc., religion offers diverse teachings. But they all have one thing in common, keeping the tradition.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Christian Worldview

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whether we all acknowledge it or not, we all have a worldview. In essence, a worldview is the lens through which we see and understand life. A worldview does not determine what events take place, but it does determine how we make sense of the events that take place. There are many different worldviews, but the Christian worldview is set apart from the rest. There are four main ideas within the Christian worldview, and they are creation, fall, grace, and glory.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The difference between moral theory and moral code is that moral theory is what makes an action right and moral code is a set of rules. My personal, every day ethical decisions been based upon a particular moral code. The moral code I live by is be good to others. Ever since I was younger my teachers and parents would tell me to treat people the way you want to be treated and if you don’t have anything nice to say then don't say nothing at all. When I was younger I didn’t take these rules very seriously and I would say some hurtful things to people unintentionally. My teachers would have to pull me aside and tell me that what I said was rude and I shouldn’t say again but it just went through one ear and out the other. I didn’t see anything…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays