The end of Of Mice and Men presents readers with one of the great moral dilemmas in literature. It focuses on two friends who go through various events that in there old town and here. Lennie commits an act that forces both him and his partner, George, to vacate their old town and enter a new one. While at this new town, another incident occurred at there job which causes their associates to become angry and begin a man hunt. George soon on in the story is met up with Lennie at a spot they chose to go to if anything happened, which did. George had the option to kill Lennie or allow him to live and help him evacuate to somewhere else. George did not have it in him to allow the others to kill Lennie, instead, he decided …show more content…
If he would have allowed Curley, or any other character to kill him, he knows that Lennie would have died with fear. George knew that Lennie would never truly be happy again if he were to be locked up in jail and decided that this way was the correct option. George knew Lennie's would not be able to make it anywhere on his own. George killed Lennie also as punishment for the murder of Curley's wife. George, to me, had all the right reasons to commit the act. If I were in George’s place, I would have done the same thing. Once a friendship is built and for some reason you are in this situation, you feel as though it is disrespectful or rude to allow people hunting your friend to just be able to kill him. I believe George had many reasons to justify his actions. To me, it was an even better idea making Lennie turn around and dream because it put him in a state of mind that calmed him and comforted him, making the act easier. George and Lennie’s friendship was so close and shared such a bond that they would not have expected this to come from either of them. What George did was a brave thing and included a meaning to the novel about friendship.
The end of Of Mice and Men presented readers with one of the great moral dilemmas in