Koppleman’s essay attempts to look at the obscenity law what he calls the ‘obscenity doctrine’ and its usage of the phrase ‘moral harm’. He criticizes the law as he feels that it is too crude and is not workable hence it should be abandoned. Koppleman also believes that the fundamentals of the law have never really been addressed adequately and what the law seeks to protect seems to be misunderstood in some sense. Koppleman takes the side of the conservatives over the liberals and attempts to present an argument that holds both viewpoints but does justice to the conservative argument.…
The general argument made by author Alain de Botton in her book, Status anxiety, is that comedians are able to talk about controversial or offending messages, but get away with it because they are humorist. More specifically, Botton argues that humorists serve a vital function in society because they can say things that others cannot or will not say. She writes “to convey with impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly.” In this passage, Botton is suggesting that we need humorists to say the offensive things in a humorous way so it is acceptable. In conclusions, Botton’s belief is that we need comedians to say the things that aren’t okay to be said by others.…
All the news we hear, whether it’s on television, in class or even a conversation will always have conflicting and different beliefs, theories and responses. For example last night my husband and I were watching the premier of “Angry Boys” a mockumentary by Chris Lilley. He described the series to be a comment on "what it means to be a boy in the 21st century by putting representations of the male of the species under the microscope." To me the program sounded intellectual when in fact it consisted of a variety of comedic representations ranging from the racist “Gran”, a juvenile prison officer to Nathan and Daniel” identical twins (one of whom is deaf). As we sat on the lounge watching the program our laughter peeled from the room in tandem to each other; we didn’t agree on what was or wasn’t humorous.…
Alain de Botton argues in his book, Status Anxiety, that the chief aim of humorists is not merely to entertain but “to convey with impunity messages that be dangerous or impossible to say directly”. Because of this, he says that humorists play a vital role in society since society allows humorists to communicate things that other people cannot or will not say. I disagree with Alain de Botton’s argument that humorists convey impunity messages because of comedians George Carlin and Lenny Bruce. George Carlin was an extremely influential comedian that got arrested for doing one of his most famous skits, “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television”. After doing the skit at Milwaukee’s Summerfest, he was arrested for breaking obscenity laws.…
In Alain de Botton’s 2004 book, Status Anxiety, he claimed that the chief aim of humorists is not to just entertain, but also to “convey impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly.” This statement is true because comedians, cartoonists, and other humarists can change the world with messages that they portray through their works. By using their different techniques, humorists can effectively get a message out to the public that would typically get a person in trouble. Such an example of this would be political cartoonists who, through their works, can show representations of political corruption throughout the government without being target by the mentioned politicians. Political cartoonists have always delivered their messages to the public despite the dangers they may face for it, such as the political cartoonists…
McGraw, A. Peter and Warren, Caleb. “Benign Violations: Making Immoral Behavior Funny.” Psychological Science, vol. 21, no. 8, 29 June. 2010, pp. 1141-1149. SAGE Journals, doi: 10.1177/0956797610376073.…
This paper will explore whether the animated show South Park is an effective use of social commentary. We will explore the controversial topics covered by the show and the reactions to those shows from both a liberal and conservative viewpoint. In addition, we will look at how topics covered in a humorous, cartoon format may be able to more effectively discuss taboo subjects and why this show should be taken seriously in its social commentary.…
In the article, “Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious”, Antonia Peacocke discusses the struggles that the television series has dealt with ever since it was first aired in April of 1999. She claims that although the series seems extremely immature and crude, it is actually politically correct. Peacocke describes the types of jokes made in Family Guy and explains that if they were to be looked at more in depth rather than just at their surface value, they really possess a more insightful meaning. Family Guy is a show that does not intentionally intend to poke fun at people to make them feel unintelligent, but to describe and attempt to lighten up the issues that take place in every day society of in the world as a whole.…
Humorists are people who are skillful in using humor for writing, talking, or acting. Their works bring laughter and elation to people. In Botton’s book, Status Anxiety, he believes that humorists not only entertain audience, but also convey important messages that cannot be said directly. Thus, he argues that humorists play a vital role in the society. In most cases, Botton’s claim is justified in that since the early nineteenth century, humorists express their thoughts about the society through humor. Some of these humorists do play important roles in the society by revealing crisis or events happening during that time period to bring awareness from the society.…
Humorists are entertainers; even before written history they have always been essential to society. Comedians such as Chris Rock, have never been and are praised for their entertainment. Humanity has standers, where a person with high expectations in society cannot say personal comments due to their status in the social order. Nevertheless, humorists are allow to say anything they can and without any consequences. This idea allows comedians to speak out and say what they please with impunity messages. These comedians who speak their word are found hilarious since they speak truth that we as a society can not say or we would be shun by our classes. Furthermore, humorist’s shows such as Tosh.0 or even Silent Library aren’t a threat to civilization or any political figure. They are the jesters of society. These shows help alleviate the amount of stress an individual contains from their hassles in life. They also help to maintain balance in society by providing decent enjoyment and relaxation. Humorist’s impunity messages are not always sympathetic but they still catch the audience attention by providing unnecessary attention to themselves and others as entertainment.…
Religious authorities, government officials, and quite commonly school board members are often the ones responsible banning distribution of the book because of either complaints or personal reasons; usually targeting novels, religious affiliates remove them if they are not aligned with their beliefs, likewise school board members, or librarians, find it unnecessary to hand books out with explicit sexual content and offensive language (“Banned Books”). Various authorities have initiated book banning ever since books were created, it was easier to prevent objectifying novels from public distribution in the early ages because they were produced by hand (“Banned Books”). Now in modern day civilization, any objectively critical and obviously offensive novels are permanently targeted subjects of book banning, solely for content unsuitable for the child, which is constantly governed by the parent for some. Not even humor is safe from the thundering leer casted down upon projects of all kind; humor is the perception that a predicament or statement tickles an individual’s funny bone, thus causing them to cackle in response. How censorship applies to humor dates back to the B.C. era, where Plato complains that if a child discovers the amusement repelled against the gods, then they will invoke superiority and ridiculed for mocking the gods by the public (Nilsen). Provocative listeners will deride many comedic performers for misaligned realities promoting stories colliding with each other like polar opposites, only out of spite will they wag their tongues to silence the “triggering” factors breathed from the comedian’s flames. Performers, comedians, public speakers, and advertisers utilize derisive or witty humor as any other individual in today’s society would, they poke fun at an individual by…
“Most people under the age of twenty-five get their news from shows like mine,” Stephen Colbert stated on his former late night show The Colbert Report. His program, along with other popular Comedy Central news shows such as The Daily Show and The Nightly Show provide factual national and international current events, with entertaining satirical commentary. In Alain de Botton’s book, Status Anxiety, he claims that humorists are vital to society because they say things that others cannot and will not say. Humorists are important in any society because they are given the duty of speaking up through challenging authority, making people think, and voicing their opinions.…
Christiansen, Adrienne E., and Jeremy J. Hanson. "Comedy as Cure for Tragedy: Act up and the Rhetoric of Aids." Quarterly Journal of Speech 82.2 (1996): 157-70. Print.…
Good deeds reframe bad deeds. Moral Licensing - justifying actions that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic by doing good deeds in the past – has been documented in various domains in our lives. Revisionist History showed that several examples of moral licensing existing in politics, and I was curious about whether moral licensing also affected supporters of Barak Obama – the first African American president in US history.…
The world enjoys laughter; they say it is the best medicine. In every part of the world there are comics, jokes, and satire. Most of them are all in good fun, but sometimes the jokes get taken too far. The recent uproar over a political cartoon in the Middle East has sparked a lot of interest with religious satire. Why does religion get attacked so frequently? How far is too far? When are the jokes no longer funny, but hurtful? Whenever someone's religion and morals are attacked, it is no longer funny. Religion is a serious topic than many people have in their lives all around the world. The beliefs of religious people (Christians in particular) are not a joking matter, and the satire is no longer funny. Religious satire has become a topic that damages the Christian faith, is morally wrong, and an outward way to be malicious.…