Moral Neutrality

To examine this prescribed title, one must first determine what is to be understood by certain fragments of it. Firstly, the claim of, ‘no such thing’, meaning that an object or concept is not in existence whatsoever. Secondly, and most importantly is the concept of a, ‘neutral question’. This needs to be further reduced to defining what neutrality is, before a neutral question can become conceptualized. Neutrality is a word that can take on several meanings, all based on the context of its usage. Neutral has meanings ranging from uninvolved in a conflict such as a war, or simply implying a blandness. The meaning that pertains most to this prescribed essay title, and the one that shall be taken as the primary definition is that of moral neutrality.
The two schools of thought contradict each other at their most basic level, the number of romantic partners involved in a relationship, yet both still exist in the world at large. Due to situations of polar opposition such as this existing, it is next to impossible for a question to be truly neutral, as it is reasonable to assume that if one moral stance finds a question to be taking all possibilities into account, forming neutrality, there will be another stance that disagrees, finding it to be unbalanced and not neutral. This brings to mind the question of how must a question be posed so that it may be considered neutral to all possible moral
Examining the nature of them through a veil of the natural sciences, one can find that neutrality in questioning is possible. However this possibility is limited, mainly for the need of a balance of moral valences in answers to a question. This becomes a limitation when one realizes that to truly find this balance, the question must become universal and have its every facet explored. Similar limitations are found when the idea of neutral questions is considered in relation to the way of knowing of ethics. For a question to be ethically neutral, it must be so simplified, that not only does it hold no real substance, but only the most basic of information can be gained from it. These draw into question whether or not neutrality in questions is really worth the detriment to the effectiveness of the question in acquiring knowledge. While some would say that the neutrality is of the utmost importance, as it ensures there is no associated bias to the information received, many others would argue that for the sake of utility, neutrality must be sacrificed