In his opinion, these warnings fail reality checks. For support, we are to consider the remarkable advances in science that are still being made in an age where scientists regularly employ new technology. We have the fastest computers, paperless mail, and lectures conducted using PowerPoint rather than memorization. Additionally, Pinker suggests that we should--instead-- be witnessing a decline in scientific achievement if these technologies were going to have an adverse effect on research. That the mere addition of these new technologies have only enhanced the scientific process, and ensured that we can continue to make new advances (by helping us to work faster and more efficiently). As he puts it, “Knowledge is increasing exponentially; human brainpower and waking hours are not” (Pinker
In his opinion, these warnings fail reality checks. For support, we are to consider the remarkable advances in science that are still being made in an age where scientists regularly employ new technology. We have the fastest computers, paperless mail, and lectures conducted using PowerPoint rather than memorization. Additionally, Pinker suggests that we should--instead-- be witnessing a decline in scientific achievement if these technologies were going to have an adverse effect on research. That the mere addition of these new technologies have only enhanced the scientific process, and ensured that we can continue to make new advances (by helping us to work faster and more efficiently). As he puts it, “Knowledge is increasing exponentially; human brainpower and waking hours are not” (Pinker