Preview

Moral universalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral universalism
Moral universalism Moral universalism also called as moral objectivism which can be defined as the position in meta-ethics that some moral values can be applied universally to everyone which is also known as universal morality. Besides, moral universalism also can be defined as the system of ethics, or a universal ethic that applies to all people regardless of their personal opinion or the majority opinion of their cultures. Furthermore, moral universalism also holds the moral values that apply to individual bases on other characteristics such as race, religion, sex, culture or other distinguishing feature (Richardson and Williams, 2009). In addition, universal ethic is a set of principles which apply to all people, whether secular or religious, independent from any particular faith (Wisdomcommons.org, 2013). However, according to Noam Chomsky’s interview in 2007, he defined moral universalism as ‘if something that 's right for me, it 's right for you; and if something that’s wrong for you, it 's wrong for me’ (Olson and Faigley et al., 1991, pp. 1--35). Moreover, moral universalism does not necessarily imply that morals exist apart from humanity itself, but it also considers the sources of morality outside of opinion. However, universal truths about human nature and reason may come into play as reasons for the universality and objectivism of morality (Delanty, 1997, pp. 30--59). Furthermore, according to Noam Chomsky, he mentions that moral absolutism and moral realism are the strong forms of moral universalism. However, moral realism is a philosophical point of view which states that there are moral facts that let us better understanding what we can and should be acted upon (wiseGEEK, 2013). Besides, moral absolution is an ethical view that some form of human conducts are right or wrong, regardless of other circumstances such as their consequences or the intents behind them. In fact, nowadays moral universalism has become a basis for modern human


References: Delanty, G. 1997. Habermas and occidental rationalism: The politics of identity, social learning, and the cultural limits of moral universalism. Sociological Theory, 15 (1), pp. 30--59. Olson, G., Faigley, L. and Chomsky, N. 1991. Language, politics, and composition: A conversation with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Advanced Composition, 11 (1), pp. 1--35. Richardson, H. and Williams, M. 2009. Moral universalism and pluralism. New York: New York University Press. Schwartz, S. 2007. Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38 (6), pp. 711--728. Wisdomcommons.org. 2013. Universal Ethics | Wisdom Commons. [online] Available at: http://www.wisdomcommons.org/virtues/152-universal-ethics [Accessed: 7 Nov 2013]. wiseGEEK. 2013. What is Moral Realism?. [online] Available at: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-moral-realism.htm [Accessed: 7 Nov 2013].

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (1)No major social upheaval can be had without negative consequence and, coming on the heels of the most violent war in American History, Reconstruction was no exception. Given the fierce determination of the North to remake southern society and the stubborn ferocity in the south to reclaim their former lives, the African-Americans faced worse and more violent conditions during the Reconstruction period than they had during slavery. The harder the radicals in the north pressed down upon the south, the harder the south resisted. The African Americans were caught in the center. We see in Thomas Nast’s “Worse than Slavery” (p477) a depiction of how white terrorism in the form of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremists , which the north could do little to suppress and the south felt was their only way to fight back, was actually worse than slavery. However, though many adversities and hardships were faced during Reconstruction, the net result of the effort was a positive one for the African -Americans because they attained freedom, citizenship and voting rights -- the means to improve their lives.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2030 unit 7 and 8 quiz

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no ‘_universal__ truth’ in ethics, that is, there are no moral truths that hold for all peoples at all times.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soc 120 Assignment Wk2

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We are taught the difference between what is right and what is wrong at a young age by our parents or guardians. What is classified as right or wrong can differ between cultures, races, ethnic identities, and by social class. We all have a sense of what is morally right and the relativity of it. There are specific traits and beliefs that are distinctive to every culture, race, and social classes, due mostly impart to the differences we have in what we consider to be morally right. The idea of universal morals shows that through our cultural differences there is still a connection to the moral beliefs that we share, and shows that cultures are more alike than admit.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Waller, B. (2008). Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Goodman, L. E. (2010). Some Moral Minima. Good Society Journal, 19(1), 87-94. Retrieved from EBSCOhost on May 3, 2011.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunt, L. H. (2011). Ethics. Web: World Book. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from World Book…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reconciling Values and Ethics in a Global SettingEthics refers to principles that define behavior as right or wrong. Who determines which actions are right and where did the rules come from? The definition of "right" is clearly a matter of perspective (Josephson Institute of Ethics, 2002). Differences in perspective due to the infinite diversity of people often lead to conflict between personal ethics and those adopted by groups. Individuals must find ways to reconcile diverse personal, organizational, and cultural ethics to succeed in a global setting.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “Some moral minima,” I must agree with Lenn Goodman’s opinions. Though they reflect, to the extreme, his relativism, I agree the topics he chose are all wrong in the eyes of another culture’s virtues and morals. This is a difficult decision because, even if it is true that no norm can be made absolute unless some other is compromised, unanimity is no proper standard of moral universality. We humans and the societies we constitute can be wrong. “Consent is a helpful marker, but neither necessary nor sufficient to legitimacy. Some whose interests are critically affected by our acts have no effectual say in our choices. Principles are principles; no norms delineating concretely, and uncompromisingly, wrong from right” (Goodman, L.E., 2010).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foundations of Mythology

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I think that most cultures have the same beliefs about morality and that we believe a higher power exists and that beyond that the similarities end. Differences between social and cultural details are what divide’s us on virtually all…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “we need to understand the morals of other cultures,” it says, “we cannot judge the morals of other cultures,” regardless of the reasons for their actions. The contradiction of cultural relativism becomes immediately apparent. A society that embraces the notion that there is no ultimate “right” or “wrong” loses the ability to make any judgments at all.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rachels, James and Stuart Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 2010. Print…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays