Have you ever thought of yourself as untouchable? Maybe you just won the soccer league you play in or got a raise at work. Now have you ever had a dream? Chances are pretty good you have, but the second you woke up it vanished. In The Haunted Mind by Nathaniel Hawthorne and The Masque of the Red Death by Edgar Allen Poe the philosophical idea of dreams collides with the stubborn feelings of being sacrosanct.…
Before any major changes are made in my company they are tested and theories are made. They are tried several different ways until they are made perfect or at least thought to be made perfect. They however take different staff members and make these changes and see how they effect various areas of our company. Some things that they try work better and others do not work. By giving the staff a say and a part in these changes they have an opportunity to have better quality workers who feel a sense of loyalty that they may not have had elsewhere.…
Session 1 2013 Faculty of Business School of Computing and Mathematics CSU Study Centre Sydney Internal Mode Subject Coordinator Chandana Penatiyana Withanage…
The focus of this course is the reasoning process used when we are making decisions. Some reasoning processes are for individual decisions, while others are for social decisions. It is important to remember that the course (and these assignments) are NOT about opinions (your own or the expert’s), but rather about the reasoning process used in arriving at these opinions and decisions.…
A 19 year old college student and addicted gambler was pulled over for erratic driving on the Long Island Expressway. He pulled out a toy pistol and pointed it at the officer, he was then shot and killed. Another incident involving a 45 year old cancer patient had the same ending in new Jersey. He walked into a Pizza Shop and pointed a gun at the officers inside eating. Experts believe that they force the cops to kill them as a form of suicide. Suicide is difficult to commit and forcing an officer to kill you takes away the pressure of completing the task. Some insurance companies don’t cover suicide and religions forbid it so it is away of taking the guilt and shame away from common suicide. 10% of fatal police shootings are brought on by people seeking to die.…
In the ethical simulation Aaron Web an employee in the IT department of the company we worked for wrote a blog about some confidential information within in our company. It is against company policy for employees to release confidential information about our company. In this company it is my duty not to reward employees who violate the code of conduct or break the law, to honor employees' right to free expression even when they are critical of the company, and to ensure that privileged information about the company is not made public. After some investigation and an anonymous tip from another employee that hacked into Aaron’s home computer I decided that it would be best for our company to let Aaron go, because I felt that simply letting him off with a warning would not send a strong enough message to him and other employees about the seriousness of breaking company policy. Although Jamal Moore who I was told is a good employee and was diligent in investigating the situation to prove that our company network is not secure enough I thought it was best to let him go as well, because hacking into another employee’s personal computer is also against company policy and two wrongs do not make a right, nor did I think it would be ethical to fire one person for breaking company policy and not another. Personally I would have preferred to let Jamal off with a warning, because his supervisor did tell me that he is a good employee, and without the information he provided it would have been hard to catch Aaron, but to protect the company from a law suit I thought it was best to let him go as well. It was more important for me to think of what would be best for the company as a whole using Utilitarian ethics which focuses on the greater good for the greatest number of people in the company as well as Consequentialist Ethics which focuses on the consequences of a decision or action. I had to think about how other employee’s would react if this situation was taken lightly, as…
Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, Natural Rights Theories, and Religious Ethics A “utilitarian” argument, in the strict sense, is one what alleges that we ought to do something because it will produce more total happiness than doing anything else would. Act utilitarianism (AU) is the moral theory that holds that the morally right action, the act that we have a moral duty to do, is the one that will (probably) maximize “utility” (happiness, welfare, well-being). AU is not to be confused with egoism. The egoist really only cares about his own happiness. AU says that everyone’s happiness counts equally. Suppose that executing Joseph would in the long run produce more total happiness than letting him live would. Then according to AU, we ought to execute Joseph. Now if Joseph is a convicted serial murderer who would probably escape and commit more murders if we tried to incarcerate him, then it’s reasonable to think that executing him would be the right thing to do. But what if he has committed no crime? What if he is simply an extremely irritating person with no friends or loved ones, and the many people with whom he has contact in his life are very sensitive and dislike him intensely? Since more total happiness is produced if Joseph dies (the increased happiness of the many who no longer have to endure him outweighs his unhappiness about dying) than if he lives, AU says that it’s right to kill him. This example illustrates what is probably the main objection to AU: it tells us to violate rights/commit injustices when doing so is necessary to produce the greatest total amount of happiness. A “utilitarian” argument in a looser sense is one that alleges that we ought to do something because of its “good consequences” (or not do something because of its “bad consequences”), where good/bad consequences needn’t be limited to what increases or decreases happiness, but might include other things that a strict utilitarian theory attaches no positive or negative intrinsic value…
RELATIONSHIPS INVOLVING medical practitioners and the pharmaceutical industry raise serious concerns and The Medical Journal of the medical profession and the controversy within bothAustralia ISSN: 0025-729X 4 February 2002 176 2 118-121 broader community.1,2 Within the profession itself views differ sharply, from the conviction 2001 www.mja.com.au ©The Medical Journal of Australia that the risks associated with such relationships are minimal to a concern that all Clinical Ethics contact between doctors and industry involves compromise and should therefore be avoided as far as possible.3 The relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and the medical profession includes clearly desirable aspects (eg, the cooperative efforts of industry, government and prescribers in trying to achieve quality use of medicines) and less clearly ethically justifiable ones (eg, acceptance of lavish gifts and money for entertainment expenses by doctors).…
Bibliography: Aguirre, Angelita M. "Medical Issues in the Reproductive Health Bill". The Truths and Half Truths about Reproductive Health, The Bishops-Legislators Caucus of the Philippines. 2008, p. 5…
The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10354), informally known as the Reproductive Health Law, is a law in the Philippines which guarantees universal access to methods of contraception, fertility control, sexual education, and maternal care. While there is general agreement about its provisions on maternal and child health, there is great debate on its key proposal that the Philippine government and the private sector will fund and undertake widespread distribution of family planning devices such as condoms, birth (BCPs) and IUDs, as the government continues to disseminate information on their use through all health care centers…
Ever since I was involved with RH advocacy back in 2009, I have observed that our movement has grown bigger and stronger. Young people have become more involved and have since been in the forefront of the movement. Women especially mothers have aired out their concerns of having a limited options for them in status quo. The deaths of 11 Filipino women a day due to pregnancy and child birth complications according to UNFPA makes the bill a necessity if not urgent. Celebrities like Tony Award winning actress Lea Salonga, singer songwriter Jim Paredes, Health Secretary Esperanza Cabral,…
As we all know RH bill or the reproductive health bill is a big issue for people against it especially the Catholic Church & the pro life. It is still on the big debate and deliberation, but the people concerned are still fighting for the RB bill to became proven law by the senate & house of representative. There are so many advantages of the bill with regards on Philippine life & economy. I do believe the lesser the member of a family the greater the possibility of every child would be given proper attention on their health and education. There will be better life for every child born, because their parents could provide them good food, shelter & education. Proper family planning would also lessen the number of street children. There will be responsible parenthood.…
First and foremost, the bill aims to guarantee universal access to methods of birth control and maternal care. If this is the chief aim of this bill then I would surely oppose to pass it. Why in the first place is there a need for them to focus on birth control? Philippines is not overpopulated so why control birth? I can just imagine that the advocates of this bill would surely agree to me at this point but on the other hand, they would say that it is in the near future that our country would be overpopulated and they would point out that the birth control is for those poor families who have a large number of children which they could barely support. Though the bill does not directly state it, it still implies that the booming population of poor families in our country is the reason why we are in poverty. Thus, if this bill is passed, our problem of poverty would be solved. But what I can say is that there is no logical correlation between overpopulation and poverty. So how can they be so sure that the problem of poverty could be solved?…
Over the years, several bills have been filed in both the Senate and Congress, proposing alaw on “reproductive health”; all provoked the most polarizing public debates. It seems hard tothink as to why some people are still against it when almost the entire world has been practicingcontraception, family planning and such. This paper will try to examine the real issues involvedand why the proposed bill has divided our country once again.The House Bill No. 5043, more commonly known as the Reproductive Health Bill of 2008, which is in substitution to House Bill Nos. 17 (Adolescent Reproductive Health), 812(Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development), 2753 (Women'sRight to Know Act) and 3970 (Bill Enhancing the Philippines’ Labor Dispute SettlementSystem) was introduced during the first regular session of the 14th Congress by Honorable(s)Edcel C. Lagman, Janette L. Garin, Narciso D. Santiago III, Mark Llandro Mendoza, AnaTheresia Hontiveros-Baraquel and Elandro Jesus F. Madrona.The bill declares that in accordance with the state policy, it upholds and promotesresponsible parenthood, informed choice, birth spacing and respect for life in conformity withinternationally recognized human rights standards. It shall then uphold the right of the people,particularly women and their organizations; to effective and reasonable participation in the bill’sformulation and implementation. This policy is anchored on the rationale that sustainable humandevelopment is better assured with a manageable population of healthy, educated and productivecitizens. What are guaranteed by the state are the universal access to medically-safe, legal,affordable and quality reproductive health care services, methods, devices, supplies and relevant…
The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10354), informally known as the Reproductive Health Law, is a law in the Philippines which guarantees universal access to methods on contraception, fertility control, sexual education, and maternal care.…