· Fullwinder – “land of the giants” world appears normal to those who have made it; but don’t see how it privileges/disadvantages others.
· Consequentialist arguments – forward thinking; justified b/c good outcomes are alleged to happen; create greater diversity = greater good outcomes
2. What are Singer’s and Steinbock’s opposing arguments on animal ethics/rights and on the use of animals in experimentation? What are the specific reasons that Singer and Steinbock each provide for their positions?
Singer – animals can experience pleasure/pain so they deserve our moral consideration. Speciesism is an injustice parallel to racism and sexism.
· Not all animal lives are of equal worth. Human interests may outweigh those of nonhumans.
· Need of an overall balance of pleasure over suffering
Steinbock
· Pain of animals is a morally relevant consideration but is not morally decisive.
· Morally good reasons for taking our own species as morally special
· Affirms speciesism – humans are more important than non-human animals, even though animals still have moral status.
3. What is Ishmael’s analysis of the differences between Taker and Leaver cultures? What are examples of how Takers and Leavers perceive and treat the world around them differently?
Takers are ‘those who know good and evil’ and the Leavers are ‘those who live in the hands of the gods’. The Leavers are those that are subject to the conditions under which evolution takes place. Takers want to put an end to creation itself because they believe that ‘the world belongs to man’ whereas the Leavers’ motto is that ‘man belongs to the world’.
· Takers – ‘those who know good and evil’; want to put an end to creation itself b/c they believe that the ‘world belongs to man’
· Leavers – ‘those who live in the hands of the gods’; subject to the conditions under which evolution takes place; ‘man belongs to the world’
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail”, King talks about how to know the difference between just and unjust laws. He states, “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust”(Shafer-Landau 408). King believed that unjust laws promote disharmony and that these laws essentially destroy human personality, while just laws uplift personality. In his opinion, he believed that laws were characterized as just laws if they were helping to make an individual better as a person, if it did not meet those standards it was considered to be an unjust law. An unjust law is a “code that is out of harmony with the moral law”(Shafer-Landau 408) essentially meaning that an unjust law is a law that is…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Examples of just laws can first be found in the area of family law. Document C states “Law 148: If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is determined to marry a second wife, he shall marry her. He shall not divorce the wife whom the disease has seized. She shall dwell in the house they have have built together, and he shall maintain her as long as she lives.” This means that the man may remarry, but he must support both wives. This matters because we know that in the past you were allowed to remarry, but you must support whoever you marry. Another example of just laws would be “Law 168: If a man has determined to disinherit his son and has declared before the judge, “I cut off my son,” the judge shall inquire the son’s past, and, if the son has not committed a grave misdemeanor…, the father shall not disinherit his son.”…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Example of just laws can first be found in the areas of personal injury law. According to Document E,” If a man strikes the daughter of a free man and causes her to lose the fruit of…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
"An unjust law is no law at all.”(Letter from Birmingham Jail, Page 4) The definitions for…
- 811 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There are just laws and there are unjust laws. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws…
- 450 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The concept of justice has been defined, but what about law? Once again, the Merriam-Webster dictionary will serve as a guiding light. According to said dictionary, law is:…
- 1622 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One day as I sat in the living room, watching the news on TV, there was a story about some demonstration by animal rights activists. I found myself agreeing with them to a greater extent than I normally do. While pondering why I found their position more appealing than usual that evening, I noted that I was also in a rather misanthropic mood that day. That suggested to me that there might be an association between misanthropy and support for animal rights. When evaluating the ethical status of an action that does some harm to a nonhuman animal, I generally do a cost/benefit analysis, weighing the benefit to humankind against the cost of harm done to the nonhuman. When doing such an analysis, if one does not think much of humankind (is misanthropic), e is unlikely to be able to justify harming nonhumans. To the extent that one does not like humans, one will not be likely to think that benefits to humans can justify doing harm to nonhumans. I decided to investigate the relationship between misanthropy and support of animal rights.…
- 3544 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
-A philosophy that views the law solely as a human creation rather than as an attempt to discover, confirm, or enforce higher moral standards.…
- 2001 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
It gives basic moral significance to things that are able to experience pain and pleasure. Human’s and non humans can most certainly experience pain and pleasure therefore we all deserve equality. Singer argues that we have a direct duty to animals, to include their interest in our moral reasoning. Whether or not animals can author treatises on mathematics they like us feel pain and we therefore have an obligation not to cause them needless suffering. Singer denounces all forms of what he calls “speciesism” whereby human beings believe they can exploit animals merely because they do not belong to the species homo sapiens. Just because animals aren’t homo sapiens doesn’t mean they are not equal. They have hearts, they pump blood, they breathe and they create life, these are all qualities us humans…
- 759 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Singer states that “If we are not willing to inflict that degree of pain on a newborn baby, then it is morally wrong to inflict an equivalent degree of pain on a nonhuman animal”(Class notes, Module 07, Pg 7). Singer means that if we would not slap a baby why slap a animal and so on. So why do something to an animal if we would not do it to a human. Singer also makes another good point, “that we ought not to cause nonhuman animals to suffer if we would balk about causing humans that same degree of suffering if instituted, would force us to make radical changes changes in our diets, in our use of animals for experimentation and so forth”(Class notes, Module 07, Pg 7). Singer's point shows that if we did stop buying factory farmed food, Americans that do eat the food would have to make a completely different change in their appetite like going…
- 506 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Everyone has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, everyone has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2. What does Singer mean by saying that all animals are equal? What does he mean by "speciesism," and how is it like racism and sexism?…
- 1603 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The definition I will take is a combination of these two. I define an unjust law as one that degrades human personality through the unfair suffering of a minority group at the hands of a majority group. Keep in mind that a majority can be in either power or number. A majority in number can be oppressed by a majority in power. Any law that causes a person to suffer simply because they do not agree with this majority is an incorrect and unjust law.…
- 1740 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The first premise of his argument was that all human and non-human animals possess equal inherent value because they are all individuals experiencing life. His second premise is that possessing inherent value demands that these individuals have rights that should not be violated by others. The final premise of his argument is that any individual with rights must be treated equally and with respect. In this paper, I objected to his third premise by arguing that we humans should not interact with animals at all because we are not able to distinguish their perception of equality and…
- 990 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Just- Guided by truth, reason, justice, and fairness. Under retributive justice, the punishment for a crime must be proportional to the crime.…
- 990 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays