Morality in Transformational Leadership Style
Morality in Transformational Leadership Style
I. Leadership
This article aims to discuss the weakness of transformational leadership style. As we know there are two kinds of leadership styles namely the transformational and transactional leadership.
Leadership occupies a strategic position and is absolutely necessary in an organization, where relationships happen between two people or more in achieving organizational goals. So that the position of a leader in the organization has a very important role in order to influence others to achieve its intended purpose (Burns, 1978).
Robbins & Judge (2006) defines leadership as the ability to influence a group towards the achievement of objectives. This is a process of directing and influencing activities associated with the work of members of the group. Leadership is also a process of social influence run by a person intentionally to structure activities and relationships in an organization.
Leadership is an interaction between members of a group, which is a leader as a change agent and as someone who will better influence the behavior of others that affect them. Leadership is also a dynamic process in which leaders and followers interact with each other.
From the several opinions about what leadership can be explained that there are dominant in this sense, namely that the leader affects the subordinate, the leader was able to convince them that the subordinate personal interests to be part of the vision that the leader, and able to ensure also that they contribute to same - similar implement.
Influence runs by the leaders include aspects, ideas or thoughts, feelings, attitudes and behavior. Thus the success of a leader is to what extent he succeeded in influencing the thoughts, feelings, attitudes and behaviors desired to lead leaders. This raises the need for new leadership style, activities and skills to deal with environmental changes that took place quickly.
Effective leadership is the leadership that
I. Leadership
This article aims to discuss the weakness of transformational leadership style. As we know there are two kinds of leadership styles namely the transformational and transactional leadership.
Leadership occupies a strategic position and is absolutely necessary in an organization, where relationships happen between two people or more in achieving organizational goals. So that the position of a leader in the organization has a very important role in order to influence others to achieve its intended purpose (Burns, 1978).
Robbins & Judge (2006) defines leadership as the ability to influence a group towards the achievement of objectives. This is a process of directing and influencing activities associated with the work of members of the group. Leadership is also a process of social influence run by a person intentionally to structure activities and relationships in an organization.
Leadership is an interaction between members of a group, which is a leader as a change agent and as someone who will better influence the behavior of others that affect them. Leadership is also a dynamic process in which leaders and followers interact with each other.
From the several opinions about what leadership can be explained that there are dominant in this sense, namely that the leader affects the subordinate, the leader was able to convince them that the subordinate personal interests to be part of the vision that the leader, and able to ensure also that they contribute to same - similar implement.
Influence runs by the leaders include aspects, ideas or thoughts, feelings, attitudes and behavior. Thus the success of a leader is to what extent he succeeded in influencing the thoughts, feelings, attitudes and behaviors desired to lead leaders. This raises the need for new leadership style, activities and skills to deal with environmental changes that took place quickly.
Effective leadership is the leadership that