Preview

Morality is a culturally conditioned response

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1914 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality is a culturally conditioned response
Morality is a Culturally Conditioned Response
‘Morality is a Culturally Conditioned Response’ is an article printed in the magazine ‘Philosophy Now’ and is written by Jesse Prinz who is a distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York. This is an argumentative article where the writer, Jesse Prinz, has argued in favor of moral relativism and supported the theory that moral judgments are based on emotions hence they vary from person to person. The writer has written was able to give sufficient examples like Cannibalism, infanticide etc to prove how morality has changed overtime and how emotions, more than anything, are responsible for a person’s moral values which make his arguments strong. However, he has passed some rather absolute statements and was unable to defend relativism effectively against the allegations that were imposed by the objectivists. Despite the flaws, the writer has presented his and the counter arguments fairly well which make this article a good effort to support relativism. Since this is a very general topic it can appeal to any person regardless of their demographics. Prinz has also written several books on human nature and morality like ‘The Emotional Construction of Morals’, and ‘Beyond Human Nature’ which makes him a credible source of this information.

The author’s main point was that morality is different for everybody and according to Prinz once a person understands this, they quit being morally judgmental and refrain from the imposition of their values on others. He initially gave examples of how morality is different for everyone and then he explained the root of morality; an individual’s emotional inclination. The writer not only presented arguments to support his own opinion but put forward the view point of the opposing party, the moral objectivists, and responded to their allegations logically and analytically.
Prinz has used a persuasive tone in his article. He has used logos and has given



Cited: Prinz, Jesse. “Morality is a Culturally Conditioned Response.” Philosophy Now.” Issue 87 Nov/Dec 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moral relativist is someone who views that ethical standard, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person’s individual choice. In regards to Pojman beliefs, I do agree that most American students tend to be moral relativists. It is because of the culture that we grew up in. Morality depends on the amount of social acceptance it gets to morally good or bad. For example, he stated that individuals said they were relativists contended in the same polls that abortion is only right if the mother is in danger or that the capital punishment is wrong, but this is not always the case. Given certain circumstance, many individuals will do what he/she feels is morally right. If a mother to be feels the need to abort an unborn child so her life can be easier, she will do so. The attraction of relativism depends on, if an individual feels what they are doing in a certain situation is worth the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cultural relativism can be defined as the understanding that the choices one can consider morally right are those approved of by one’s culture. Cultural differences in moral beliefs don’t imply cultural relativism because nonmoral beliefs can alter the perspective of basic moral principles shared by the culture. This would imply that there are no universally set/correct moral standards. Saying that cultural differences in moral beliefs imply cultural relativism is only part of an argument, not a conclusion supported by valid premises. There is the possibility that the moral issue in question is, in fact, an objective truth, in which case the culture is purely wrong. If cultural relativism exists, and no culture can ever be wrong in their moral…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality and ethics create the bridge between the savage and rational side of each human being. With the intent of explaining morality, Pojman displays three different types of ethical backgrounds. The first being ethical relativism which states that an individual’s beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of the person’s own culture. This idea explains whether or not morality is only a fragment of a person’s cultural norm instead of anything truly universal. For example, in some countries, torture, racism and sexism is part of the cultural norm compared to some others countries, those behaviors are intolerable.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “we need to understand the morals of other cultures,” it says, “we cannot judge the morals of other cultures,” regardless of the reasons for their actions. The contradiction of cultural relativism becomes immediately apparent. A society that embraces the notion that there is no ultimate “right” or “wrong” loses the ability to make any judgments at all.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Minima

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article was very clear and left no room for grey areas but as history would show, and as it’s stated in the first chapter, “the view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one’s own ethical standard, often those provided by one’s own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person’s viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be “right in a given culture” or “wrong for a given society”. (Mosser, 2010)…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    philosophy

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    - Cultural Relativism seems intuitively true, but be aware that disagreement does not entail that there is not a correct answer to moral questions (p. 26-27)…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pojman On Cheating

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The relativist stand points do not allow us to judge, one cannot say that a culture was wrong in what they believed (Pojman, 253). This, however, is not helpful in benefitting us as a society. This is to say that morality in itself is a useless construct, which it does not have to be. However, Pojman offers us one more analytical method that suggests there are underlying moral principles that are universal for all human beings (Pojman,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral relativism is the concept that people’s moral judgements only go as far a ones persons standpoint in a matter. Also, one person’s view on a particular subject carries no extra weight than another person. My thesis statement is inner judgements, moral disagreements, and science are what defend and define moral relativism. Inner judgements are critiques about a persons particular behaviour and what they should or should not have done. Judgements include labels to outline a persons behaviour or lifestyle.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What techniques are used in Winston Churchill’s speech 'We shall fight on the beaches' to convey persuasion to his intended audience?…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral schools of thought dictate ethical behavior, however, every culture assigns ethical and moral values differently (Lecture 1). Without a moral or ethical structure, society would not prosper. Clashing cultural values make defining morality complicated. Ethicists argue the minimum conception of morality establishes a starting point based on reason that defines and installs a code of morality or ethics. The minimum conception of morality is an “effort to guide one’s conduct by reason—that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing—while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s action” (Rachels 13).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics