Preview

Morality Of Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
765 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality Of Animal Testing
Animal testing has been around a long time with an un-pretty history. With technology not being as advanced as it is today to use other alternative methods scientists tested their theories on animals. Animals used in scientific experiments go back as early to Greek physician scientists such as Aristotle, Erasistratus and Galen. Galen practiced in Rome where he conducted animal experiments to advance the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology and pharmacology. Arab physician in the 12th century Moorish Spain conducted animal experiments for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients. The testing of animals was started to test new medicines, surgeries techniques and cosmetics. Testing of animals played a …show more content…
Animal’s rights are violated when they are used in research. Millions of animals had to suffer and die in order to bring those medical advances to a reality. “Animals have a basics moral right to respectful treatment. Both animals and humans are alike in many ways that we both fell, think, behave and experience pain. Animals have never been treated with the same respect like humans they don’t have a choice when we they are tested on. These test subject these animals to tremendous pain and suffering and the end results usually ends up in permanent damage to them or their deaths. Millions of these animals die because animal testing is very cruel and ineffective. In these test animals are injected with diseases they wouldn’t normally contract such as major heart diseases, cancers, HIV, Parkinson’s disease or schizophrenia. In fact, 92% of test that pass animal testing fail in human trials. There is so much time, money and the lives of animals being wasted in these test. The Cruelty Free International states that out of 93 dangerous drug side effects, only 19% could have been predicted by animal test. “Despite many decades of studying conditions such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, stroke and AIDS in animals, we do not yet a reliable and fully effective cures” …show more content…
Reduce, refine or replace are referred to as “the 3R’s”. This concept was first written about by William Russell and Rex Burch in their 1959 book The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. The 3R’s by definition described is to reduce the number of animals being tested on. Refine animal use by eliminating the pain and suffering done through testing animal models. Replace animal models with non-animal systems such as computers models, biochemical or cell-based

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Animal testing has been around for years; even centuries for that fact. There was a “Greek doctor named; Galen. Galen researched and studied them back in the AD time frame” (Understanding Animal Research). However,…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing is so painful for animals and they don't understand why they're being put through this pain. It is also very inhumane and morally offensive. Animal testing is cruel and an inhumane way to torture animals for mankind's own benefit. There have been millions of animals that have suffered a vicious, painful death in the name of research. Lastly there are alternatives to Animal Testing such as computer modeling, As science continues to transform our world beyond what we know, and technology continues to transform and expand upon what we depend on. Medical research and testing will also transition to embrace and…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is not morally acceptable for scientists to use live animals in research for medicine that can be used to cure humans. Today we continue to use animals in experiments to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals and to ensure the safety of new medical treatments. Now that we know the purpose of animal testing, is it really worth killing millions of innocent animals? This practice is morally wrong and inconsiderate of us for letting this happen. People should stop using animals as experiment subjects and utilize the advance technology that we have now. This is happening because we are letting it happen! We have to start by educating others on this issue because the lack of knowledge on animal testing is why people…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unethical Animal Testing

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Experiments on animals are cruel and expensive. New scientists are developing methods that replace animals. The tests use human cells and tissue (known as in-vitro methods), computer modeling techniques (known as in-silico methods), and studies with human volunteers. The new experiments take less time and money to complete.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal testing has always been a dispute between people; some people think it’s morally wrong and some people think it helps with medical and scientific breakthroughs. Drugs that people use or cosmetics that are used could have been tested through animals before being stocked on shelves. About 800 animals are tested on before a drug is passed to clinical trials (“Is animal”). Many animals get tested on, but many like mice, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and some other animals get tested on. Animals can be used to find new advances in medical treatment and check safety for products, but these animals that get tested on can go through pain and death. Animal testing is wrong and should be stopped because…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing had been around since the time of the ancient Greeks. In the past, animal were only used for researching anatomy and how organs worked in those specific animals. Now animals are used to test pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Of Animal Testing

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals have been used in research for countless numbers of years, dating back all the way to BCE. The number of animals in testing has grown as the years have passed, and their purpose has resulted in treatments for lung cancer, childhood leukemia, breast cancer, and many others. When most people think about animal science, they think about the cruelty and immoral treatment of animals; they do not bother to think about the side effects of animal testing. The medicine we buy or are prescribed, the lotions we use, and everyday makeup we wear would not be available without the use of animals in labs. With all the benefits that come with animal testing, one might ask why anyone would be opposed to animal testing. However, an article entitled “Ethics…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It’s not right for powerless animals to live their life in a laboratory, knowing nothing but a life of pain and agony that they’ve grown accustomed to. The unethical tests do not give us accurate outcomes and billions of dollars are being wasted. Animal testing should be an outdated practice by now since we have the technology to create more accurate, effective alternatives. The only solution is to put an end to animal research testing for good and have it banned. Justice needs to be served for all the animals victim to this…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a very huge controversy and many people have an opinion on it. Some people wan animal testing to stop due to safety hazards and concerns for the animals, while others aren't so concerned about it, since testing it make it better for everyone. Animal testing used to be deemed necessary but not people can't be so sure. I personally believe that animal testing should continue and i will later state my reasons why. first, what exactly are the pros and cons of animal testing? Testing Animals has many good and bad reasons.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Dilemmas

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will discuss the dilemmas of testing drugs on human beings, as well as the dilemmas once we shift testing drugs on animals. There are several ethical dilemmas when it comes to testing drugs on people in general. A number of the tests can be potentially life threatening. The new drugs may cause severe reactions which might not be treatable later on. For years, scientists have been experimenting on humans.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Balls, Michael. “Alternatives to Animal Testing: Toward Reducing Uncertainty and Unintended Consequences.” AATEX 16.3 (2011): 101-110…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former UK Home Office minister Joan Ryan. Said: “Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide...” –First of all, using animals for researching is inhumane because the animals are beings living and they have their own feelings. A person for the Ethical Treatment of Animals PETA says “On top of the deprivation, there are the experiments. U.S. law allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No experiment, no matter how painful or trivial, is prohibited – and pain-killers are not required. Even when alternatives to the use of animals are available, the law does not require that they be used—and often they aren’t.”.[Animals]. Moreover they experiment pain as us.They are treated cruelly for research. I think that humans as animals are just as important as each other, as a result they don’t deserve death four our fault.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays