Preview

Mr. Burke's Pamphlet On The French Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr. Burke's Pamphlet On The French Revolution
Among the incivilities by which nations or individuals provoke and irritate each other, Mr. Burke’s pamphlet on the French
Revolution is an extraordinary instance. Neither the People of
France, nor the National Assembly, were troubling themselves about the affairs of England, or the English Parliament; and that
Mr. Burke should commence an unprovoked attack upon them, both in Parliament and in public, is a conduct that cannot be pardoned on the score of manners, nor justified on that of policy.
There is scarcely an epithet of abuse to be found in the English language, with which Mr. Burke has not loaded the French Nation and the National Assembly.
Everything which rancour, prejudice, ignorance or knowledge could suggest, is poured forth in
…show more content…
Mr. Burke, on the contrary, denies that such a right exists in the nation, either in whole or in part, or that it exists anywhere; and, what is still more strange and marvellous, he says: “that the people of England utterly disclaim such a right, and that they will resist the practical assertion of it with their lives and fortunes.” That men should take up arms and spend their lives and fortunes, not to maintain their rights, but to maintain they have not rights, is an entirely new species of discovery, and suited to the paradoxical genius of Mr.
Burke.
The method which Mr. Burke takes to prove that the people of
England have no such rights, and that such rights do not now exist in the nation, either in whole or in part, or anywhere at all, is of the same marvellous and monstrous kind with what he has already said; for his arguments are that the persons, or the generation of persons, in whom they did exist, are dead, and with them the right is dead also.
To prove this, he quotes a declaration made by Parliament about
…show more content…
Burke conceives his point sufficiently established by producing those clauses, which he enforces by saying that they exclude the right of the nation for ever. And not yet content with making such declarations, repeated over and over again, he farther says, “that if the people of England possessed such a right before the
Revolution” (which he acknowledges to have been the case, not only in England, but throughout Europe, at an early period), “yet that the English Nation did, at the time of the Revolution, most solemnly renounce and abdicate it, for themselves, and for all their posterity, for ever.” As Mr. Burke occasionally applies the poison drawn from his horrid principles, not only to the English nation, but to the French Revolution and the National Assembly, and charges that august, illuminated and illuminating body of men with the epithet of usurpers, I shall, sans ceremonie, place another system of principles in opposition to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. To Sir Edmund Burke: Since you are part of a minority which would prefer violence between the colonists and Native Americans as you do not support the Royal Proclamation of 1763, I must ask why you have this belief.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main claim of this passage is the unjust and tyrannical rule of the Great Britain over its colonies, in what is now, and referred to as the United States of America. As the author refuses to acknowledge British policies and legislature as a legitimate authority in his motherland and demands freedom, this is but a claim of policy. The author insists that every man is entitled by God to a just and free legislature, which safeguards one’s rights and honor. Therefore; supporting his claim and hence arguing that they have been given the divine right to denounce the Britain’s exercise of unjust power over their lands.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leading up to the fierce and fiery confrontations at Lexington and Concord, a tumultuous period of debate and negotiation ensued regarding the preferred response of the colonies to British encroachment on their rights. The meeting of Virginian representatives in March of 1775 would prove to be a fruitless affair; that is, until a young, ardent lawyer by the name of Patrick Henry delivered an impassioned oration, with the intent of elucidating upon the reality of the situation: that the then-colonies were being driven to militant opposition of their royal overlords, and that to continue on passively would be to “retreat...[into] submission and slavery.” In his speech, Patrick Henry persuades the convention, and thereby the people, of the necessity of revolution through his employment of metaphorical imagery, stylized religious and mythological allusions, and a slew of rhetorical questions. In a blaze of libertarian sentiment, Henry incited the passions of the delegates and set the stage for the most glorious revolution in the history of mankind.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burke’s protest of the revolution does not come from his estimates of its “extremist nature”, because he does not appreciate the extremities that are involved. He said that he was “incapable” of being in touch with those “who profess principles of extremities and who, under the name of religion, each little else than wild and dangerous politics.” That being said from what I have read about Burke, was that he was a religious man who believed that a man’s right was not an abstract principle, meaning that it was always development and it was not part of the first set of knowledgeable principles. He did not appreciate the extremist nature because he did not believe that there are rights and reasons to justify violence.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Reflections of the Revolution in France, Edmund Burke intellectually attacks the French for the occurrences that took place in their country during the late 1700s. Burke was strongly opposed to immense political reform. In this book, he voices his belief that it is counteractive to try new types of government because it can lead to the loss of the progress achieved by the past generations. Thus, he argues that all men are subject to a generational contract that embodies beings from the past, present and the future. This is where I begin to have a problem with Burke’s argument because, as stated in Paine’s book The Rights of Man, old forms of government cannot keep up with new elements that come about with changing times; thus, civilians…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the basic human right, we are all enjoying the inherent freedom since we were born. However, 200 years ago, a group of people was fighting for their freedom perseveringly. On 23rd. March, 1765, Patrick Henry, who is the leading lights of American Revolution, gave the speech in front of Virginian audience. He responded the oppressive against the control of British. he turned colonial ideas against negotiation with England and toward armed rebellion. Patrick Henry illustrates the themes of freedom in the speech to Virginia convention through the use of the statement that there is no middle ground between freedom and slavery, the experience that how British desecrates their freedom and the emphasis on the importance of freedom.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American Revolution DBQ

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    well-entitled to all the natural, essential, inherent, and inseparable rights, liberties, and privileges of subjects born in Great Britain. . . . Document G: “Declaration of Colonial Rights and Grievances,” 1 October 1774, First Continental Congress Source: Enduring Voices document sets to accompany Boyer, et al. Enduring Vision, 41–43. [The] inhabitants of the English colonies in North America, by the immutable laws of nature, the principles of the English Constitution, and the several charters or compacts, have the following rights: 1.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I intend to prove that the pamphlet was an instrumental part of the Revolution, helping to foment the political atmosphere to the point that men were ready to take up arms against Great Britain. These printed diatribes were unique and the nation would never see them play a role quite like this again in the course of its events, but for the time period they existed the pamphlet was uniquely suited for American consumption and allowed for some of the greatest thinkers behind the patriot and loyalist causes to expound on their views to the…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What cause Burke to enumerate in his speech is to explain the “fierce spirit of liberty” in the colonies. This was due because of separation, not conciliation. His beliefs were that it was achievable to form a legislation that would put an end of the mistrust of the American colonist and make peace between the colonies and Britain. America was treated unfairly by the Britain’s government having denied it of its self-government, the right to conduct trade, to have the right to just taxation and representatives. He cared deeply about liberty, and he understood this and the likelihood for violence that it implies. He notes that he is not looking for anything other than simple peace, and that he is truly speaking from his heart and his intentions are good and genuine.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written for a broad, general audience—without footnotes, a bibliography, or other formalities—The Coming of the French Revolution still holds a persuasive power over the reader. Georges Lefebvre wrote The Coming of the French Revolution in 1939, carefully dividing the story into six parts. The first four are organized around four acts, each associated with the four major groups in France—the “Aristocratic Revolution,” the “Bourgeois Revolution,” the “Popular Revolution,” and the “Peasant Revolution.” Part V examines the acts of the National Assembly to abolish feudalism and write Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, and Part VI presents the “October Days” (xv-xvii).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Declaration of Independence addresses natural rights of man as well as man’s consent to be governed.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thursday, Sept. 30 – Lecture 7 – American Revolution (1) - Dissatisfaction and a Break with Britain…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The justification for the colonies to choose to break with England lies in the philosophical position that human beings, commoner and king alike, are first bound by “the laws of nature” and that these natural laws should preempt the traditional notions of sovereign rule by divine right. The natural law theory is predicated on various far-reaching assumptions of…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To provide context of this amendment’s appearance in the Bill of Rights, one must see why the ideas of our forefathers were so “revolutionary”. In Pre-Revolutionary periods of the American Colonies, British Parliament had heavily…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE

    • 3012 Words
    • 13 Pages

    For several years beginning in 1983, the problem of the durability of concrete structures was a…

    • 3012 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays