Preview

Mr. Leighe Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
390 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr. Leighe Case Study
Mr. Leighe is charged with a hit and run, that caused a pedestrian to lose his life. Mr. Hall was riding his bike down the road, in front of Leighe, with his front and rear lights working properly, following all the rules. Leighe hit him with the front of his car, then drove away from the accident scene immediately. He had not only been drinking wine that evening, but also drove home, and hid his car at the back of his property. Leighe fled from the crime scene, had alcohol in his system, and hid the evidence. However, his driving record only consisted of two speeding tickets made more than 10 years ago. Leighe claims his car was frosted over making it visibly difficult to see and therefore had no intention of harming Mr. Hall. He also pleaded

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    R V. Shankar Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: The accused was driving his car without the required laminated taillights when officers pulled him over late October 2004. The police asked Shankar for his licence, registration, and insurance. The accused handed over a licence in the name of Jason Singh, the insurance information handwritten on an informal yellow sticky note, and a photocopy of the vehicle registration. When inquired about the spelling of name, Shankar misspelled Singh as ‘Sing’ and gave the wrong unit number for the home address. Based on these wrong answers, officers arrested Shankar on the basis of misleading them; officers physically removed Shankar from the vehicle and searched him. The officers discovered bulletproof vests on Shankar’s person, Shankar justified these on the basis of self defence and protection. When searching the vehicle police found numerous weapons including two guns, a hunting knife, and ammunition. Shankar did not testify in court, and was charged and convicted of two counts of possession of loaded, prohibited firearms and public mischief. Shankar appealed his conviction to the Ontario Court of…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is only one car on the street that is visible to the police officers and that is the car belonging to the couple. The officer put his hand on top of the car and it was still warm. The wife stated to the officer that she has not touched the car all day, while the husband states he last used the car 4 hours ago when he got home from work. When the officers arrived on the scene, they observed the man staggering up the doorway and saw what appeared to be a set of keys fall while the husband is walking towards the house and put the keys into his pocket. The officer performed a sobriety test on the husband and he failed the test, having a .20. Another important fact is that the address where all this is happening is the same address where the domestic violence call was made.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: The victim, Charles Keitt, drove to an alley way to obtain windshield wipers off the defendant’s car, Mr. Peterson. Mr. Peterson observed the victim, Mr. Keitt, doing this and confronted him with an altercation. The victim went back to his car and the defendant, Mr. Peterson, returned inside his home. The victim was about to leave, but because the defendant provoked the situation by bringing a pistol out his home, he came out his car with a wrench. Mr. Peterson urged the victim that if he moved, then he would shoot him. The victim stepped out from his car and the defendant, Mr. Peterson, shot him in…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drunk-driving cases present a per se exigency, the arguments and the record do not provide the Court with an adequate analytic framework for a detailed discussion of all the relevant factors that can be taken into account in determining the reasonableness of acting without a warrant. In drunk-driving investigations, the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute an exigency in every case sufficient to justify conducting a blood test without a warrant…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jamie Heyes: Case Study

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jamie Heyes is a good kid who was forced to either let his teammate die or to take action in a situation in the heat of the moment, and what all of us are here to bring to light is weather he wanted to kill Valdez. I can tell you for a fact not a material one that Jamie had no intent to kill, and the evidence supports this. The prosecution cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any of its points are indisputable or differing experiences…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harold Shipman Case Study

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harold Shipman, was a British doctor and one of the most prolific serial killers in recorded history with up to 250 proven murders between 1971 and 1998. In total, 459 people died while under his care, but it is uncertain how many of those were Shipman's victims, as he was often the only doctor to certify a death. On 31 January 2000, a jury found Shipman guilty of 15 murders. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and the judge recommended that he never be released. After his trial, The Shipman Inquiry began on 1st September 2000, lasting almost two years it was an investigation into all deaths certified by Shipman. About 80% of his victims were women, his youngest victim being a 41 year old man. Much of Britain's legal structure concerning health care and medicine was reviewed and modified as a direct and indirect result of Shipman's crimes. Shipman is the only British doctor who has been found guilty of murdering his patients. Shipman died on the 13th January 2004 after hanging himself in his cell at Wakefield Prison.…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A2 OCR Law - Intention

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "Can a defendant properly be convicted under section 1 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 on the basis that he was reckless as to whether property was destroyed or damaged when he gave no thought to the risk but, by reason of his age and/or personal characteristics the risk would not have been obvious to him, even if he had thought about it?".…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research 1

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both defendants, in my opinion, probably could try to either sue the court/ police station…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2-15-2016 @ 6:25 am. I was beeping my horns when Bill Franicola backed out of the parking space without light on and hit my car. The radio was loud when I walked to gas pump with Bill still in truck he wasn’t aware he hit my car. Harry Feals arrived at 6:27 am. He heard Bill saying he didn’t see my car and apologized to me. After Bill talked to Kelly Police officer she came to Cassel Hall @ 8:15 am. I Gave her insurance information, wrote a police report out and she took pictures. At that time, she didn’t know the protocol for accidents with Pitt vehicles I asked for their insurance card and a copy of accident report saying she would ask Chief Lynch. 2-16-2016 Police Officer Kelly came to the Cassel Hall for a copy of my driver’s licenses.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In our legal system it's said that your innocent until proven guilty. Barry Winston tells the readers a story "Stranger Than True," I a young college kid he defends who had been charged with DUI, manslaughter and a felony. This becomes a complicated situation for Winston because all evidence points to one main direction, guilty. This young kid tells Winston his story up to where he remembers was having 3 beers at a cookout up unit his sister decided it was time to leave. This kid didnt remember anything after they left, next thing he remembers is waking up in the hospital with casts and in pain. Winston notices some things that the kid hadn't mention before, which was that he never said who was driving the vehicle this kid and his sister had crashed in. But of course, he can't remember because he blew 14 on the breathalyzer. Winston showed doubt, as if he had lost all faith in this kids innocence. Barry Winston shows worry to finding a witness who knows the story, or a judge who will believe this kid.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question #5: Imagine that you have been charged of running a red light. You are innocent, of…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact Columbia College security who leads them to Fred’s dorm. Fred is passed out, so security lets them in. The officers smell intoxicants, give Fred some Field Sobriety tests (he fails) and confirm that he was driving the car. Fred is arrested for DWI. It is his third offense, a felony under Missouri law. Fred is given a breath test, which registers at .13 on the scale. During the processing of his arrest paperwork, the officers search Fred’s possessions which he brought to the station, and a small quantity of cocaine is found in Fred’s pocket. Fred is charged with DWI, leaving the scene, and possession of cocaine. What issues do you see? How should they be resolved? (50 points)…

    • 6313 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Police writing

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PD SPOT RPT OM HIT AND RUN PD 00A 1400H 06-01-14 ALPHA CONSTITUTE A SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY TRANSPIRED AT C2 SM CAG CMA WHEREIN THE VICTIM CMA IDENTIFIED AS ONE DOMINIC PACIS WAS THAT HE BUMPED RESULTING TO THE OFFENSE BY THE SUSPECT CMA IDENTIFIED AS ONE JAY AR DADIS A FLORIDA DRIVER PD INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THAT CRIME COMMTD WAS DONE THROUGH RECKLESS IMPRUDENCE RESULTING TO SERIOUS PHYSICAL PD THE SUSPECT HAS BEEN ARRESTED BY THE PENALTY OF ARRESTO MAYOR AND PROGRESS RPT TO FOLLOW PD OFFICER ON CASE DASH JOEL ECLARIN PD FOR INFO PD BT…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lopez stated that he did not have any information or overheard Mr. Cortez been involved in a traffic collision. However, he knew that Mr. Cortez had been recently arrested for a DUI before he had been discharged or terminated from the company. He does not believe that the arrest for his DUI was associated with Mr. Cortez been involved in a traffic accident. Mr. Lopez stated that he was informed about this arrest when Mr. Cortez had casually mentioned to how he was arrested and how he was rude with the cops. He said that Mr. Cortez did not provide any further details about his arrest or which police agency had arrested him for his…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays