Mr Walker Analysis Paper

Introduction This forum reply will offer a two-fold objective, in its examination of Mr. Walker’s thread. First, the work will briefly analyze Mr. Walker’s claims regarding the use and acquisition of resource. After the analyze the author - of this reply - will validate Mr. Walker’s findings by providing scholarly evidence, which supports his assertions. Lastly, the reply will cultivate clarity the section on charitable donation and volunteerism through an investigation of scriptural passages and biblical principle.
Analysis of Content Although Mr. Walker’s discussion of resource was straightforward, his analysis was lacking in content, fluidity, and entirely devoid of reference material (Walker, 2017). Due to the absence of scholarly sources within this section, the author - of this reply - will offer scholarly evidence in support of Mr. Walker’s claims. One of Mr. Walker’s primary claims - which is also discussed by Lori and Patricia (2004) - is the centrality of money
as a primary resource and mechanism for organizational functioning (Walker, 2017; Lori & Patricia, 2004). The research of Porter and Kramer (2002) affirms Mr. Walker’s beliefs about money and nonprofit organizations (Porter & Kramer, 2002). For example, “Using philanthropy [or the charitable giving of money] to enhance context brings social and economic goals into alignment and improves a company’s longterm business prospect” (Porter & Kramer, 2002, p. 6). As compared to Porter and Kramer (2002), the works of Landry, Lange, List, Price, and Rupp (2010), List (2011), and Worth (2014) also further support the charitable giving of money - as the concept holds a long and prestigious history as a predominant factor of nonprofit organizational functioning (Landry, Lange, List, Price, & Rupp, 2010; List, 2011; Worth, 2014). History exemplifies this finding - since from the ancient Egyptians to the modern the Young Men’s Christian Association - YMCA - (Landry et al., 2010) “charitable fund-raising [has taken] on a much broader role…recogniz[ing] that individuals and corporations could play a part in financing [and supporting] nonprofit agencies (Landry et al., 2010, p. 958). Thus, the inspection and comparison of numerous scholarly writing along with an examination of finance’s role and importance to nonprofit organizations have confirmed and proven Mr. Walker’s findings.
Examination of Biblical Concept On the whole, Mr. Walker’s thread was strong, however, his exploration of the biblical principle of giving lacked a scriptural reference and content, which significantly weakened his academic argument. Based on Mr. Walker’s somewhat deactivate presentation on the connection of terrible donations and volunteerism, this reply will provide an alternative examination of this discussion - including a scriptural reference - for the clarification of the issue. The book of Ephesians reveals the giving is both one of the core principles within Christianity and foundational mandate - in the same manner as the prohibition of theft. “If you are a thief, quit stealing. Instead, use your hands for good hard works, and then give generously to others in need” (Eph. 4:28, New Living Translation). Since the Ephesians passage commands the theft to both work hard and give richly - thus, this passage reveals that charitable giving and volunteerism are connected by mandate of God’s word (Eph. 4:28, New Living Translation). Moreover, the research of List (2011) has also proven a causal connection between terrible giving and volunteerism - due to the concept’s motivational origins (List, 2011). “People typically help worthy causes in two ways: giving money and volunteering time. Volunteerism in the United States is an important and growing component of charity” (List, 2011, p. 160). In other words, statistical data demonstrates that both giving and volunteering are valued and practiced by individuals who frequently support nonprofit organizations. Based on these findings it is self-evident that the biblical principle of giving is the foundational connection between the concepts of charitable donation and volunteerism, and this their practice is established within the writing of the Scriptures.
Conclusion
This reply found Mr.
Walker’s thread to be comprehensible and interesting, but lacking in substantive content and reference materials. However, this reply has validated Mr. Walker’s through an survey and discussion of charitable giving important as an organizational resource and the concept’s historical significance. Examining the works of other scholars in comparison with Mr. Walker’s assumptions determined that Mr. Walker’s work was found to be reasonably congruent with the research of scholarly experts. To clarify the connection between charitable donation and volunteerism, this reply examined the concepts’ connection in light of a scriptural and scholarly context, which revealed that charitable donation and volunteerism are interconnected as biblical mandates and statistically repetitive personal actions. Overall, the thread was well crafted in writing structure and Mr. Walker’s strong articulation of core conceptual ideas revealed the work’s enjoyable nature and well executed
analysis.