Preview

Muammar Gadaffi: A Brilliant Ruler

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Muammar Gadaffi: A Brilliant Ruler
Muammar Gadaffi was a brilliant ruler when he had seized power in 1969 he had deemed himself colonel from captain after his role model Gamal Abdel Nasser whose beliefs and philosophy inspired him as a leader and found him very close to the Egyptian president for this reason (Source K). Colonel Nasser response to the western countries in the Suez Canal crisis that took place in 1956 when the western powers were blocked access through the Suez canal due to their previous dominance of it when the western powers in the form of Britain and France attempted to invade Egypt and over throw president Nasser through Israel and gain dominance of the canal so that they can get access to Asia and Africa since they had colonies there as well as their cargo ships that brought oil more conveniently the coup was unsuccessful leading Nasser to close the canal for a year after this had taken place not allowing any foreign ships …show more content…

An example being South Africa during apartheid he assisted the ANC and other revolutionary groups when the USSR could not, to continue the struggle against the oppressors which was the apartheid government at the time that Libya under Gadaffi treated with hostility being made aware of the happenings taking place during the apartheid regime ,not long after having the revolution a success in south Africa by the ANC being the ruling government Nelson Mandela had taken to Libya to thank Gadaffi for his support during the struggle and acknowledging him for being a unselfish man who cared for people in the struggle as he did with the revolutionaries as they had limited support but Gadaffis support was not hidden for their cause and through this Gadaffi had built strong ties around the world as he did with Nelson Mandela the former president of the ANC (source

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Times were very rough for the Native American Indians during the early 1900’s. Author Mary Crow Dog; a native American, tried to paint a vivid picture of some of the trials and tribulations that she underwent or heard about while she attended boarding school. Ms. Crow Dog tries to help readers better understand what she and many generations of Native Americans endured while attending St. Francis boarding school; which is located in South Dakota. She clearly stated that her mother and grandmother were not exempt from the harsh punishments given by the boarding school. Some of the same things that were going on at the school when Crow Dog was attending…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the fourth paragraph, under the subtitle The Prince, Vincent Barnett states that Machiavelli refers to all men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars, and deceivers.” He also states that men were not loyal, but greedy and self absorbed. Machiavelli also wanted the “prince” to make himself feared, but not hated.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gough Whitlam Case Study

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He strived to get rid of anti-Communism, and allied with South-East Asian countries. Broke free of the attitudes from the Cold War. Wanted a diplomatic relationship with Asia.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is that Ronald Reagan did not have a firm grasp of world issues, history, or geography. When Reagan told French president Fran `cois Mitterrand, a socialist, that communism and socialism were the same, Mitterrand wondered, “what planet is that man living on?” Superficial and often mistaken about elementary facts, Reagan acted more on instinct that on analysis. Expressing the reformist message to common in U.S. foreign policy, he liked to quote Tom Paine of the American Revolution; “we have it in out power to begin the world over again,” Reagan stated that the Soviet Union was an “evil empire,” that would “ commit any crime,” “lie” and “cheat” to achieve a communist world. Because he attributed Third World disorders to Soviet intrigue, the president declared the Reagan Doctrine; the United States would openly support anticommunist movements, “freedom fighters” wherever they were battling the Soviets or Soviet backed governments. Under this doctrine, The CIA funneled aid to insurgents in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Angola, and elsewhere. In open defiance of the sovereignty of those nations, Reagan worked to overthrow their governments.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He made a huge contribution to help Germany, while they tore down the Berlin Wall that separated Eastern Berlin from the western side of Berlin. He also ended the Cold War with Russia. Reagan made the end of the cold War very peaceful with the Russian leader. Ronald Reagan ended the cold war because he felt the USSR was an ‘’evil country’’ (Ronald Reagan an American Life) and he did not want their communism to spread to other countries. He used ‘’strength to make peace’’(Ronald Reagan An American Life) That meant that he built up the United States military until the Soviet Union was willing to make a peace treaty to end the Cold War. Reagan made the United states feel safe from the Cold War for the first time in many…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harry Truman had helped provide economic aid to France after Vietnam had gotten their independence from them because he wanted to contain communism. He also provided aid to countries like Turkey and Greece.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1793 to 1794 is when the Reign of Terror began and end. The Reign of Terror was about 2 years from when Louis XVI was beheaded and around the time 20,000 people were guillotined. 35,000 people were killed by officers and officials. The Reign of Terror was not justified.The claim stated can be supported by these 3 reasons: they were threatened in wrong ways for the wrong things , the methods used were not necessary, and the reasoning they gave did not match the actions.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus Persuasive Essay

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If Epicurus were alive today I believe he would be wise to advocate his four-part cure for anxiety. I will address how some of his points may seem harder to adhere to today, but how they are nonetheless helpful and still widely used to help cope with anxiety. Every person is a reflection of their time. However, if born today I believe Epicurus’s four-part cure would at its core still be the same and hold great merit.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    but not enough to fix North Koreas poor economy. No effective tax system is in…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insecurity In Iran

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mossadeq’s government wanted to nationalize the oil industry of Iran which was under the control of the British in a company called the Anglo-Persian oil company. The government of Mossadeq didn’t please the western powers and nationalizing the oil posed a huge threat to economy and power for the west. In addition, Mossadeq was a symbol of foreign resistance and considered a fierce nationalist and has a huge support from the people of Iran. Nevertheless, he was accused of having communist leanings and can shift Iran to be part of the soviet circle. Consequently, the CIA and British Intelligence with the agreement of the Shah decided to overthrow Mossadeq’s rule with a military coup by using the Iranian military. This coup was a doing of the American foreign policy because The USA and the western camp were trying to stop any nationalistic actions and the region and contain the threat of communism (Gasiorowski). The west also wanted to raise the strength of his biggest ally Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and appoint a new prime minister that will serve their interests. The CIA was very involved in the internal affairs in Iran to the point of managing a huge propaganda in order to weaken Mossadaq’s government. Even after the success of the coup, the…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iranian Revolution Essay

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most significant factor that led to the Islamic Revolution of 1979, was the British and American involvement in Iranian politics and their support of Mohammad Reza’s reign. America and Britain backed the coup that deposed Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, whom through nationalising the Iranian petroleum industry, limited their power and influence. As the industry that was previously…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exchange relationship between the Ben Ali government and the citizens in Tunisia did not seem to be balanced. Prior to a series of protests and demonstrations and subsequent abdication of Ben Ali, the Tunisians had been resigned to the dictatorship of Ben Ali in exchange of a decent life. However, are the…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    suez crisis

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Suez Canal crisis, also known as Tripartite Aggression, was an event that occurred in the Middle East in 1956. It arose by Egypt slowly taking control over the Suez Canal which was followed by an attack from Israel, France, and Great Britain. “The Suez Canal is a man-made waterway in Egypt. It was built by a French developer named Ferdinand de Lesseps. It connects the red sea to the Mediterranean Sea. This canal is important for ships traveling from Europe to and from the Middle East and India.” (The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia) After Gamal Abdel Nasser took control over Egypt in 1954, his main goal was to modernize Egypt. He wanted to build the Aswan Dam as a major part of improvement. Both the United States and Great Britain agreed to loan Egypt the money for the dam, but then decided to pull their funding due to Egypt’s military support of the Soviet Union. This angered Nasser. Nasser then decided to take over the Suez Canal in order to pay for the Aswan Dam. At that time, the British were taking over the canal to keep it open and free for all countries. Nasser detained the Suez Canal and was going to charge for passage in order to pay for the Dam. Britain, France, and Israel made a plan and decided to attack Egypt. Just like they planned, Israel took over the canal and then France and Egypt jumped in. The Soviet Union then threatened to join the Suez crisis with Egypt. The United States ended up forcing the Israelis, the British, and the French to withdraw in order to prevent conflict with the Soviet Union.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nothing made Ronald Reagan more proud to be Commander and Chief of his country. One of the things he took very seriously was to keep the man and women that were serving the country out of danger, and he would only send troops to battle if it was absolutely necessary. Reagan was a realist he understood America's role through the military. Reagan knew he had to raise military expenses to 43%. One reason why the U.S and the U.K has a special relationship was because they both had similar views about communism. Ronald Reagan knew that is was important to be a good neighbor and he knew it was important to reach out to other countries when he could. One thing America always has done is help other countries fight their own wars. Reagan sent the US Marines Corps barracks in Beirut ou to protect the Lebanon people from Arab-Israeli war. But when terrorist groups started to attack he pulled the troops out for their safety. This shows that he tried to help other countries in every way he could.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aid given in foreign interventions may not be the best decision for the country thus may result in accidental ramifications. Case in point, United States foreign intervention in Libya in 2011. Libya has been under the dictatorship of Muammar Gaddafi for 42 years, since 1969, in which he had caused the downfall of its society. Although their per capita income was fairly high, at $14100, an estimated one third of the Libyan population lived below the poverty line. -6- With empty promises made and scarcity still going on, protests started in early 2011 in several cities. Muammar Gaddafi announced that the rebels would be "hunted down street by street, house by house and wardrobe by wardrobe". -7- Bloodbath broke out shortly after with thousands killed or injured. Barack Obama, President of the United States at that time, sanctioned military intervention in Libya with the aim of saving lives and improving the society. The U.S, together with other NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) countries enforced a Libyan no-fly zone and started bombing Gaddafi’s forces, encouraged Gaddafi to step down. After seven months, having sustained Western support from the U.S, rebel forces dominated the country and killed Gaddafi. In spite of the freedom earned by the Libyans, Obama's mediation in Libya was a wretched failure. Violent deaths and other abuses to human rights have in fact…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays