For example, the Mughals were known to be calm and peaceful when it comes to conquest or dealing with certain matters inside the Empire. However, the Ottomans are known to be harsh/strict. To add on, the Mughals were more lenient when dealing with non-Muslims, they weren't as severe and gave them certain rights to keep them satisfied. On the other hand, the Ottomans imposed the mandatory Jizya tax on the non-Muslims. They had certain rules and laws to abide by, and were much more "contained" by the Empire. Lastly, the Mughals were Sunni-Muslim and Sunni-Islam was found throughout the Empire, and the Ottomans were Shiite-Muslim meaning that Shiite-Islam was found throughout the Empire. Thus, the Mughals and Ottomans can be clearly distinguished from one another based on their branch of Islam and how strict they were, when dealing with
For example, the Mughals were known to be calm and peaceful when it comes to conquest or dealing with certain matters inside the Empire. However, the Ottomans are known to be harsh/strict. To add on, the Mughals were more lenient when dealing with non-Muslims, they weren't as severe and gave them certain rights to keep them satisfied. On the other hand, the Ottomans imposed the mandatory Jizya tax on the non-Muslims. They had certain rules and laws to abide by, and were much more "contained" by the Empire. Lastly, the Mughals were Sunni-Muslim and Sunni-Islam was found throughout the Empire, and the Ottomans were Shiite-Muslim meaning that Shiite-Islam was found throughout the Empire. Thus, the Mughals and Ottomans can be clearly distinguished from one another based on their branch of Islam and how strict they were, when dealing with