Preview

Multinational Business Corporations Gaining More Power in Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Multinational Business Corporations Gaining More Power in Society
Multinational Business Corporations Gain More Power

Multinational Business Corporations Gain More Power
The world is entering a period where corporations are gaining more power in society. Multinational business corporations will ultimately become more powerful than the government. Corporations influence decisions made by the government by providing campaign funding and lobbying. Businesses strive to satisfy their consumers’ wants and needs far well than the government strives to satisfy the wants of its population. Financial crisis and recession can begin in areas where jobs provided by corporations are lost, granting businesses power over the job market and gross domestic product. This essay will address how corporations are gaining power because of the relationship they share with the government, capability to keep consumers satisfied, and by providing the country with numerous job opportunities.
Corporations share a reciprocal relationship with the government, which some may consider legal bribery. They provide campaign funding and in return receive permission for their business ventures. This leaves voices of the average citizen unheard and/or ignored. For example, water has been contaminated in areas where businesses were granted permission to eliminate toxic waste. “State regulators in Pennsylvania are allowing millions of barrels of toxic, cancer-causing waste to be dumped directly into waterways that are the source of drinking water for millions of people” (Caruso, 2011). Local residents’ complaints were ignored for the benefit of funds provided by companies thus giving corporations more power than the public. Although state regulators claim the water is safe to drink, the “wastewater contains cancer-causing chemicals as well as barium, which causes high blood pressure, and radium, which is radioactive” (Caruso, 2011). Therefore, corporations can buy power from the government regardless of the negative effects it may have on human life.



References: Caruso, D. (Jan 3, 2011). 'Fracking ' Pollution In Water: Pennsylvania Allows Natural Gas Drilling Waste Disposal In Waterways. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/03/fracking-pollution-in-wat_n_803737.html. Naoi, M., & Krauss, E. (2009). Who Lobbies Whom? Special Interest Politics under Alternative Electoral Systems. American Journal Of Political Science, 53(4), 874-892. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00406 Trivett, V. (June 27, 2011). 25 US Mega Corporations: Where They Rank If They Were Countries. In Business Insider. Retrieved October 9, 2012, from http://www.businessinsider.com/25-corporations-bigger-tan-countries-2011-6?op=1. Wallace, N. (2012). Innovation Officers Give Charities a Chance to Explore. Chronicle Of Philanthropy, 24(18), 1-11.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the process in which the fracking solution is forced into the ground at high pressures, occasionally toxic fluids can leak out from the system and contaminate nearby drinking water. Environmental studies have concluded that methane concentrations are seventeen times higher in drinking water wells near fracturing sites. There are at least 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to fracking areas as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water. Up to six hundred chemicals are used in the fluid solution they send into the ground, including carcinogens and toxins such as uranium, methanol, mercury, hydrolic acid, ethylene, glycol, and formaldehyde. When they bring the fracturing fluid back up after fracturing the shale rocks, to release the natural gas, only thirty to fifty percent of it is recovered. The waste solution recovered is then left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actually, “the Fortune 100 companies alone had combined revenues of $13 trillion and profits of $605 billion during the last election cycle”(Pro 1). Through this money, the companies have the ability to push their agendas onto candidates, which creates politicians only focused on a select fews problems because they are worried about appeasing them to gain the necessary funding. In addition, this decision drastically puts back the time scales of democracy by more than a century, which is treatourous for the entire country (Pro…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They are concerned that millions of gallons of contaminated wastewater are produced from fracking methods and that there are currently no facilities operating to remove these pollutants. When separated by a mile or more from groundwater sources and the earth’s surface, the ancient marine waters along with naturally existing toxic compounds are not an issue, but “Fracking disturbs, distributes, and carries upward with the fracked gas ‘produced waters’ containing radioactive materials, heavy metals, hydrocarbons such as BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and toluene [sic.]), bromide, highly concentrated salts, and many other organic and inorganic compounds that, when exposed to our environment, are dangerous health hazards—many are known as carcinogens and toxic to biological life” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). Which brings up the question of why can’t they use less toxic chemicals in the fracking process? Tracy Carluccio, the Deputy Director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, continues by stating, “even if companies were to switch to ‘green’, ‘non-toxic’ fracking fluids, drilling and fracking in these deep formations will always deliver potentially deadly chemical hazards, even in a perfectly regulated world” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). The cement and steel casings used in combination with the methods for sealing post-production gas wells do not confine the methane along with other dangerous gases and contaminated fluids that are pressurized within the aquifer.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hydraulic Fracturing or fracking was first introduced in 1940s and has then been a key provider of natural gas and oil worldwide. Despite its expansion and customary use, fracking still poses many health and environmental concerns. During fracking, pressurized liquids are injected into drilled wells, which cause the surrounding rock to crack open allowing gas and oil flow through the fissures. Millions of gallons of water are used and a similarly large volume of waste water is generated. Most of the water is never restored and the stored waste water and fracking fluid can adversely affect the animals and vegetation around it. Along with the water, other chemicals are injected into the ground as far as 10,000 feet below the surface and enter groundwater, polluting drinking sources for many. Fracking may be a key provider of oil but this expensive, polluting, low energy-return process is not worth the loss of wildlife habitat, natural land and innumerable water resources.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment 1

    • 3095 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Smelser, N. and Baltes, P. (2014). Multinational corporations. [online] www.columbia.edu. Available at: https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/bkogut/files/Chapter_in_smelser-Baltes_2001.pdf) [Accessed 3 Aug. 2014].…

    • 3095 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice and oppression over equality, run our governments. We have peaceably assembled here, as is our right, to let these facts be known.” (OWS 2011)…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This allows corporations to indirectly support political leaders, but ultimately they cannot voice their concerns. The essay also argues that corporations do in fact deserve to have the same protections since they are not technically able to vote, but must pay taxes. Without the ability to have free political speech, these corporations technically do not have any way to influence any decision that may affect their businesses or trades. The essay…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated before, to get to the shale of gas, the drill passes through the fresh water aquifer. The aquifer is where the public gets their water. A popular pro- hydraulic fracturing argument is that there is not any traceable pollution due to drilling; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection says the contrary. “The Department has determined that eighteen…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While fracking accidents are mostly harming the animals, fracking also pollutes the water, consequently people are noticing a huge change in water quality. Fracking contaminates the water in a very obvious way. Fracking could had been done only using water and clean sand. However to make the job easier and cheaper, the process includes many other 596 or more chemicals, many were harmful and some were unknown. Even though the fluid used in the process is pumped out after doing its job, it's impossible to get it all out. People found black grease, odors, methane, a gassy taste, and black sediments in their drinking water after the…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial new method of extracting natural gas from the earth has become a danger for Americans. This method is called Hydraulic Fracturing, or Fracking. This drilling has made it possible to retrieve methane gas trapped in the shale rock that lays thousands of feet below the ground. For some, fracking can be seen as a good thing for our country. Fracking is boosting the nation’s economy, creating jobs and energy export opportunities, and strengthening the energy independence of the United States. Although it may help in some aspects, it comes at a very high cost to the American people. Fracking is extremely harmful to the water supply, the environment, and the population.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Businesses Figure out that they can use their wealth to influence policy makers. Another article…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Water is one of our important resources that were given to us by mother nature. We see water as a source for survival and many more advantages. It's fragile, and the smallest amount of contaminants could ruin it for a population, yet one of the major ingredients in fracking processes is the water. Reports of accidents involving water contamination are everywhere. The basic process of fracking is its uses of incredible amounts of gallons of water per drill and drilling so close to groundwater sources risk contamination. "Accidents have already been documented and citizen's well waters have been tainted with toxic chemicals", according to the Climate Progress. (Foster) Many of the chemicals used in the fracking process are proven toxins. These include benzene, ethyl-benzene, toluene, xylene, naphthalene, and other hazardous chemicals that are harmful if any contact is made.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Should Be Banned

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The amount of water that is used is not environmentally friendly. The large amount of water used in fracking a year is equal to 80 cities with a population of 50 thousand water consumption annually (Earth Works). Once the water is used it becomes waste water and is most commonly left in open pits to evaporate. Currently there are not a lot of ways to contain the wastewater; however, some companies believe that using deep well injection as a method of disposal are actually quite wrong. In the US some fracking companies dispose their wastes in deep wells that lie underneath the surface. It has even been directly related to causing earthquakes. This happens in several states in the United States, however, Pennsylvania has outlawed the use of deep well injection (Easton). As a result, the fracking companies are forced to transport the wastewater by road. “To haul water off-site for disposal over the 20-year life of a hydraulic fracturing well-project, it was estimated to cost $160 million (includes trucking costs, water disposal costs and labor)” (Easton). It is evident that there are no safe ways currently developed for disposing fracking wastewater. Subsequently, there have been several recorded accidents in the U.S that were caused by improper disposal of waste…

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Research Paper

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, “Up to forty thousand gallons of chemicals are used in each fracking operation, containing a toxic bath of 600 chemicals like mercury and uranium.” (Salmon City Post 35). After, “the shale rocks surrounding wells are fractured, methane gas and toxic chemicals flow into nearby ground water.” (Salmon City Post 35). Some studies show that the methane concentrations in drinking water wells are over 17 times higher near fracking sites. (Salmon City Post 35). Among, not only hurting the people, but hurting animals by taking their homes, polluting their water supply, and taking down their food supply.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Democracy and Rhetoric

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Corporations have special privileges and there are real social structures. Certainly not every person in the United States is treated equally and as for the right to vote, Winston Churchill once said, “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” In July, President Jimmy Carter said “America has no functioning democracy” at a meeting of The Atlantic Bridge in Atlanta. This was a couple months after the NSA revelations were brought to light by Edward Snowden. Noam Chomsky has said “In the US, there is basically one party – the business party. It has two factions, called Democrats and Republicans, which are somewhat different but carry out variations on the same policies. By and large, I am opposed to those policies. As is most of the population.” Taking a rhetorical criticism class in addition to rhetorical theory, I have learned both…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays