Preview

Murder In Shakespeare's The Tragedy Of Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
545 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Murder In Shakespeare's The Tragedy Of Caesar
Murder is a type of crime known to be quite gruesome and cruel. With this in mind, most states define murder as an unauthorized killing that is both obstinate and premeditated, meaning that it was the intent after planning or waiting for the victim. During the time period of Ancient Rome, an incident on the Ides of March took place and caused a great deal of havoc. In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar the conspirators were not right to kill Caesar. The reasons for the conspirators killing Caesar are unjustifiable is the killing of Pompey’s sons, Caesar denying the crown three times and illogical explanations that were given. With this is mind, Caesar has defeated the sons of his archival, Pompey, in battle. Hence, …show more content…
Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tension mounted between Caesar and the Senate of Rome, on account of Caesar’s possible claims to the title of king. In fact, financial birthrights allowed Senators to buy their seat in power. Furthermore, the senators wanted to live by their own rules and not under Caesar’s ideals. Motivated by these factors the senators decided to assassinate him.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I, as a juror in Brutus’s trial, am responsible for examining Brutus’s intentions in killing Caesar and determining whether he should be punished for being part of the plot to assassinate the leader of Rome. The resolution of this case will either justify Brutus and the other conspirators’ act of murder or avenge Caesar’s death. Due to his overly ambitious nature and false claim that he did what was best for Rome, I believe that Brutus killed Caesar to gain power and therefore should be punished for his involvement in the murder.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, I believe that Caesar's killing was not justified, because an entire war was started between Antony, Brutus, and Cassius. If Caesar was not killed, then there would be no chaos or war. Julius Caesar wasn’t as bad as he seemed, yes he was very power hungry, but what he was trying to do was also for the good of Rome, while Brutus and Cassius killed Caesar for only themselves, and not for the good of their country.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the happenings of Julius Casers assassination I am writing an article of a firsthand account who saw it happen. It was one of the assassinators Marcus Brutus. I interviewed him and asked him many questions on how the whole thing came about and why he turned on Caeser in the first place. Here is what he said.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The conspiracy of Julius Caesars death was based off of emotions and logic. Because Brutus His friend was willing to place his ideals over his friends life because he thought it was what was best for the Rome's republic. which was based off of emotion because Caesar didn't do anything wrong for Brutus to be wanting Caesar eliminated.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How To Kill Caesar

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page

    In class we played a game where two people were chosen to be the killers and two where chosen to guess who the killers were. In the game the killers would kill by winking at people. This game relates to the book in the sense that there are people out to kill Caesar but he doesn't know who. He doesn't know because the people out to kill him are acting like normal people just like in the game.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With our support and his loyalty to his country, was broadening the future. However the power driven conspirators desired Caesar killed for the anger he caused. Tragically, on the Ides of March, eight men with sick minds completed their mission when they not only murdered Caesar, but his dreams for the future. Caesar, Brutus, the leader of the conspirators and, “One of Caesar's closest friends” (Lee, “Killing Caesar), said he was doing it for the well-being of Rome seeing he had the public's opinion on his side. This unsurprisingly, was incorrect. Cassius had written fake letters to Brutus when he aspired to have him as the conspiracy leader. But he should have been more logical and wiser, and realize the public adored Caesar and his future ideas for Rome. Even though there was confusion, and Brutus thought he was doing what is best, the conspirators had one goal: rid of a political leader. These men all deserved to be sought as traitors and punished…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar, the king of Rome, was killed by Casca, who was one of the the conspirators led by Cassius and Brutus, during the convention at the capitol in Match 15th. A soothsayer had told Caesar to be aware about the date of March 15th, but Caesar did not take it too seriously at that time. However, what the soothsayer said had came true. The conspirators, including Cassius, Trebonius, Ligarius, Decius Brutus, Metellus Cimber, and Cinna planned to assassinate Caesar because they believed that Caesar was not the person who was qualified to be the king. Cassius soon persuaded Casca to join the conspirators, and he eventually convinced the one of the most honorable people in Rome, Brutus, to be part of his plan with the help of Casca and…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar “Let’s kill him boldly, not wrathfully” (Ⅱ.Ⅰ.171-172). In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the conspirators (Brutus, Cassius, Casca…) feel Julius Caesar isn't the best ruler for Rome. They have a very horrid plan to get rid of him for good. The real question is were the conspirators justified or not? In Williams play, the conspirators are definitely justified in killing Caesar because of his ambitious power and physical weakness.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, during the conspirators’ meeting in Brutus’ orchard, Cassius suggests that Marc Antony should be killed because his many connections and undying love for Julius Caesar threaten the scheme. However, Brutus opposes Cassius’ claim by stating that Antony is absolutely harmless because he will only lament after the death of his beloved friend, Caesar (II.i.157-191). Evidently, their quarrel develops the external conflict by showing Cassius and Brutus’ of their contribution to their regret and downfall on very important issues in the conspiracy. In addition, this affects the work as a whole because it develops the theme of fate versus free will by showing that Brutus chose not to kill Antony and that Cassius did not make a greater effort to change Brutus’ opinion. Later in the play, Cassius mentions that if Antony was condemned soon after Caesar was murdered, the battle at Philippi and the defeat of the conspiracy. The conflict between Brutus and Cassius shows that the Lens is correct because both men are ashamed that they spared Antony.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, the men contemplated killing Caesar among themselves without ever consulting the population of Rome. By not allowing the people in on the decision it automatically took away one of their freedoms, which within itself is a crime. When the senators took it upon themselves they broke the promise they made to the people to uphold the law and protect them from tyranny. Had they spoken with the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, conspirators, led by Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus, assassinate the ruler of Rome, Julius Caesar. They thought that he may have become a tyrant and would make the Roman Republic fall. The aftermath of killing Caesar led to violence and a civil war. As a result, the Republic evolves into an Empire. The whole point of assassinating Caesar is to prevent a dictatorship, but killing him is one of the main events why the Republic is never restored. The conspirators should have not plotted a coup because Julius Caesar is not a corrupt person and did things for the good of others, it leads to a civil war, and the justification for killing him is based on a lie.…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar's death

    • 693 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar’s assassination conspiracy on March 15, 44 B.C. had at least 60 senators involved. To this day there are only around 20 names that are actually known. When there is a group this big it is hard to pinpoint one reason, so it is believed to be several issues. For a large number of the senators however, the more popular motive was the hatred for Caesar. This is shown by the eight conspirators that had grudges against Caesar. Many even blamed Caesar for setback by them or their families. Another reason for the conspirators, is the older friends of Caesar, were aggravated by the promotion of former enemies. They were really upset when this promotion led them to being politically equivalent. Instead of feeling happy for what Caesar gave them, there focused on that negative. These same people soon resented Caesar, and then became humiliated by the situation because of how much they owed to Caesar[1].…

    • 693 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays