Preview

Murder Is Murder Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Murder Is Murder Wrong
Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being. It is an act seen as taboo by many cultures since the beginning of time. Although it is highly frowned upon, it occurs frequently. If we say all murder is wrong, we have to take into account every type of murder, the motive behind it, and the victim. All murder is not wrong; the murdering of immoral people is beneficial to society. Looking into the victims of murders, you have to ask “Did this person deserve to live?” It may be cruel to say but some people deserve to die. Society will better prosper without certain types of people or the impact the have on the people they affect.
Relating to relativism, murder cannot be seen as wrong or right in any circumstances. The worth of human life is opinionated. A relativist basically would have no opinion
…show more content…
Some believe than even criminals deserve due process while others do not care because anything that happens to them is justice. Sometimes the justice system fails to work. Criminals can get off even though they're guilty and are put back into society. To get a better picture of this, we can look into the prison murder of John Geoghan. He was a Catholic priest, convicted of child molestation, and sentenced to nine years in prison. Before he could serve his time, he was killed by another inmate. The sentence he was given still would have allowed for him to return into the free world to molest another child after the nine years were over. His murder may have saved more lives from being ruined. Sexually abused children are more likely to obtain certain mental disorder than children who were not. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 80% of adults who were abused as children can be diagnosed for at least one psychiatric disorder at the age of 21. In regards to his murder, it may have stopped for even more bad in this world, and stopped him from leaving a more widespread criminal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of brutal murder, your culture's pratices should not excuse you from taking a life. To do so without reason or to not use it as self defense is a horrific act.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Midterm

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought is the intention to cause the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, a human being.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the way people view murder, they are usually pretty one sided. Some people on earth have stubborn minds, they are full with static. The main opinion shared between these folks seems to be “Murder is murder. Murder is bad. The person who murders is therefore bad.” These bland, stale statements need to be thought through more thoroughly. What if the person who committed this crime had other intentions? What if they weren’t cold hearted and actually had a soul? In John Steinbeck’s Of Mice And Men, Lennie, a person with mental issues, doesn’t deserve to be held accountable for his actions for several justifiable reasons.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Due process should be the sole basis of the criminal justice system because it shows the true meaning of innocent until proven guilty in our society today. This “method or process” was created to help wing out those who are willing to change their ways and live right and enjoy the freedoms that we do receive. There are people who do make mistakes but some don’t deserve to be punished till death.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The justification of murdering is one major act in moral relativism in that it is illogical. An example is in a murder case somebody says they killed the person because they needed to be killed. This is illogical in that we have no right to say who is to die or not. In the commandments it states thou shall not steal. The topic goes against this commandment because you are going against God's law. Another type of murdering…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relativism gives us a greater understanding of other cultures as it explains the discrepancies in moral codes. Herodotus, a Greek historian recounted when the King of Persia offered both the Greeks and the Callatians money if they adapted to each other’s funeral practices (the Greeks burnt the bodies of their fathers, while the Callatians ate the bodies of their fathers). However both disagreed and would not swap for any amount. What was right for one tribe was wrong for the other. What is right or wrong depends upon the nature of the society; different cultures create different values. We all live with unique cultures and so have our own idea of ‘good’.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, murder is a crime punishable by the death penalty or life in prison. If the convicted murderer does not receive the death penalty, he or she could receive life without the chance of parole. Murder is a serious crime all over the world, especially in our country. The definition of murder is self explanatory, but there are lots of different types of murder that can all receive different punishments. “Capital murder is murder for which the death penalty is authorized by law.”…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due process advocates argue that the purpose of any civilized society is to secure rights and freedoms for each of its citizens-including the criminally accused (Schmallenger, 2003, p.18). The nature of individual rights is to ensure each individual receives protection as stated by the Bill of Rights. As the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights must be enforced. Without these rights, Americans might be reduced to governmental automatons, and forced back into the dark ages of segregation. Persons, not yet convicted of crimes, should retain their rights. After all, we are an "innocent until proven guilty" society.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle Essay

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A relativist would react to “What makes you happy might be one thing, but what makes another person happy could be entirely different, so do not impose your lifestyle on other people” by agreeing with the statement about not inflicting your lifestyle on someone else. Relativists believe you cannot urge morality on others. Even if it is someone who you share a primary relationship with, you can not make any judgement on what decisions they make. Relativists do not judge others, so if something very immoral makes you happy, a relativist can not impose on your choice of being immoral. Relativism says that all culture is good and all culture is bad; it’s the same thing as happiness, it can be good or bad but you can not judge a persons happiness whether it is good or bad. Overall, a relativist would never impose on someone’s lifestyle even if something totally different makes them happy, or even if what makes one happy is completely wrong and immoral.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Relativism Unfair

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If for example a relativist lived in a society that refuses to punish an individual that kills a child, then they are entitled to not like this as it is their opinion but but they are not obliged to judge the abusers actions as unjust. It is apparent that killing a child is unjust and wrong but yet a relativist has no right to declare the murderer as guilty of wrongdoing, this rise a question ‘If we are certain that murder of a child is wrong, then how can relativism exists?’ How can it be fair to not be able to label something seen as cruel , as unjust and thus wrong how can it be possible to not see this as unjust? And how is this fair on the victim? That their death was in fact not wrong and not unjust because the actions were committed subject to the perpetrator’s moral understanding of what is right and good or because their society claims that this is right and…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mass murder

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mass murdering has become an epidemic in the United States. Every human being has a right that his or her life should be protected by others. Mass murders are considered as human right violations. Human rights insure the every human being has a right to life, which should be supported by law. All these acts remove the human beings from life. Mass murders can be solved by strictly controlling psychopath, respecting her or his different political beliefs and different religion beliefs.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical relativism has two categories: subjectivism and conventionalism. Subjectivism is all about the individual, like it is everyone for themselves. This idea makes people like Hitler, Bundy, and members of the KKK (just to name a few) justified in their actions. With conventionalism it is all about the society or culture, but then it becomes a question of how many individuals it takes to make a society. If there are enough Hitler-like people then they can form their own culture with its own morals and anything goes again. Both of these views of ethical relativism seem to be going in circles allowing all behavior as acceptable.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Relativism

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Relativism is a view that the truth is a matter of opinion. It isn’t defined by some sort of black and white, right and wrong, yes and no type response. These views are determined by what that person is accustomed to according to their culture. Whereas a “thumbs up” in America is considered a good thing, in other countries it is deemed rude and similar to our form or giving someone the finger. Belching after a meal is considered rude in America, however in Japan; you are rude not to belch after your meal is finished. It is actually complimentary to the cook. The other side of relativism is individual relativism. This is a view that believes that truth is a matter of individual opinion. Shannon agrees with Lindsay that capitol punishment is wrong, however, Shannon believes that it is wrong no matter what, but Lindsay believes it is only wrong unless that person committed murder. To each of them, their opinion is correct. This is individual relativism and seems to be much harder to prove in a discussion such as this.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No I don’t think killing for any reason is ever justified be it as revenge against someone or just because you want to hurt another person.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abortion debate deals with the rights and wrongs of deliberately ending a pregnancy before normal childbirth, therefore, killing the fetus in the process. Abortion is a controversial topic for both men and women who find themselves facing the moral dilemma of whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. Abortion is one of the most polarizing issues because most people are on one side or the other and very few are undecided.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays