Preview

Musth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Musth
The change in behavior of the elephant in the short story was due to a periodic condition called musth. According to Dr. K Radhakrishna Kaimal this condition can cause physiological and behavior changes in the animal for up to two months. Musth consists of three phases: pre-musth, violent-musth, and post-musth. During pre-musth the elephant charges at any object that catches its attention, and poses as a threat to towards the mahout during this period. In the initial phase of violent musth the elephant will not obey the commands of the mahout, is violent towards him, and its behavior is disorderly. In the middle phase of violent musth according to Dr. Kaimal the elephant has a “lack of appetite” and can pull more aggressively on its chains. The final phase of violent musth can last up to a month, the elephant becomes less hostile and begins to obey commands from the mahout. In the final stage of musth Dr. Kaimal states that the behavior of the elephant begins to revert to its …show more content…
Now that the stages of must have been stated we can now discuss the temperament of the elephant in the bazaar. The narrator states that the nature the elephant has been altered due to the condition of musth after escaping the previous night, “It was not, of course, a wild elephant, but a tame one which had gone ‘must.” (Orwell 1). This quote illustrates that Orwell did not believe that the elephant posed as a threat to the citizens of Burma as the elephant was just undergoing an annual condition that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tone : One of the tones that are used in the narrative is Resentment . there is resentment towards the Burman people for making fun of him. “As a police officer I was obvious targeted, the insults hooted after me … got badly on my nerves .” Orwell states the disapproval of the Burman’s mocking showed he was irritated and resented . The other tone is pressure. Orwell was pressured into shooting the elephant.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * I think Orwell used the fact to support his analytic points by describing the death of the elephant in step by step, so the reader can imagine along. For example in paragraph 13, he explained how he tried to make the elephant suffer the least but ended up being hopeless. He also tried to explain how the elephant was in such an agony to the point that it probably couldn’t feel anything anymore.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elephant Helping Trunk

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “In training trials, a mahout would walk with his elephant to the single available rope end and train his animal to pick up the rope by using vocal commands. Rope-pulling strategies were ultimately at the discretion of the elephant, but all elephants had earlier, as part of the facility’s routine, been trained to pull chains.” This excerpt helps the reader understand how they specifically train these elephants. In the article it also talks about some of the tasks they make them do, like pulling ropes or working with others to complete the…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, the story "Shooting an Elephant” was wrote by George Orwell base on his personal experience in Moulmein, in Lower Burma .He served his country, "British Empire as a colonial administrator. The author described the effects on the oppressed Burmese Indians and theirs oppressor British Empire. The internal conflict of British men, his feelings and convictions linked to his pride from of the angry crowd. Shooting an Elephant is more than a personal experience story, is a reflection of the dilemmas of morals standards in real life and the costs that it represent as a human been and his nature as well .…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although a representative of British power, the narrator sympathizes with the oppressed natives and their country but is forced to act according to imperial aims. When the narrator receives a call, he is commissioned to bring a runaway elephant under control. In order to defend himself in the case of an attack, he takes a rifle, which makes the natives think that the elephant is going to be shot. When the narrator arrives, he finds a peaceful elephant eating, which offers no danger. He feels as if he should not shoot, but there is the mass of natives, or as he calls “yellow faces” behind him that demand the police officer shoot the elephant. After an inner struggle, the narrator finally gives in to the power of the natives’ demanding and shoots. He has to fire several shots for the animal to die painfully. The officer cannot stand the sight and leaves while the natives have already started tearing the elephant apart. “The crowd would laugh at me. And my whole life, every white man's life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at”. He admits that shooting the elephant was necessary as a means of demonstrating the power and ensure British…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He felt comfort in knowing that because a man had died due to the elephant's rage, that he was legally in the right. However, he stated did not stand for imperialism, and that it was “evil”, yet he displayed the very thing he despised. The Burmese people were treated terribly by the Empire. Orwell even says, “The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos—all these oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt.” By that, it reflects exactly what the elephants living conditions were. And with all of the rage pent up from being confined and living in deplorable conditions, once the elephant was freed, it had every reason to go rogue. Just like the elephant, the people of Lower Burman had a reason to be rebellious and filled with hate. Orwell was in a position to simply wait for the elephant's to mahout come back, as it harmlessly fed itself in the distance. Instead, he gave in to the pressure, let his ego take over, and took the life of an…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (para. 3) On the way to find the beast the officer sees a man lying in the mud, brutally mauled and dead. After seeing this "devilish" looking man he starts to ponder that he may actually have to kill this elephant if he is in danger. Rifle in hand and a crowd behind he continues his journey. (para. 4) The officer realizes the crowd is excited at the thought he is going to kill this elephant. Killing the elephant would provide entertainment and food for them. At the bottom of the hill the officer and crowd behind see the elephant across the road "peacefully eating." The officer knows the elephant has passed it's stage of "must" and not to shoot it. He decides to observe the elephant to see if the state of "must" has truly passed instead of shooting it. (para. 5 & 6) The officer has made up his mind until he "glances" at the immense crowd cheering him on and feels uneasy about his decision. The crowd would be angry and hate the British officer more if he did not shoot. The officer is faced with the decision of either shooting the elephant and pleasing the Burmese while appearing strong and dominating as a British officer or doing the right thing by not shooting the defenceless elephant. (para. 7 & 8) A thought tips the officer over the…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Being a sub-divisional police officer, he needs to keep Burma safe from all violence and danger. After describing how much he hates the imperialism, the raging elephant incident occurs. “It was a tiny incident in itself, but it gave me a better glimpse than I had had before of the real nature of imperialism-the real motives for which despotic governments act” (852). He was called in to see what was wrong with the elephant; the problem was that it was a tamed elephant gone “must”, meaning gone into sexual heat. Orwell states that it was enlightening. I assume he is referring to the work of the elephant was something interesting that…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Orwell's Dilemma

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The burdensome atmosphere of the situation caused Orwell to conform to the expectations of the crowd of Burmans. When Orwell and the crowd approached the elephant, it took no notice of them and looked in peace eating up bunches of grass. Also, killing a working elephant will enrage the owner, so it was best to avoid shooting the elephant if possible. It was quite evident that Orwell himself never wanted to kill the elephant. However, this positioned him as an extreme minority of opinions among the excited Burmans whom were eagerly waiting for the elephant’s demise. Orwell describes the scene:…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the shot is fired, the sentences are short and straight forward but longer sentences are used to emphasize the death of the elephant. This is effective in portraying the elephant’s death as slow, dragging and painful. The increasingly strong images of pain, allow the reader to feel the impact of the elephant’s death slowly building and how Orwell is reluctant to watch the elephant suffer. The more determined the author is to end the agony, the more powerless he is as his bullets are ineffectual. He eventually “could not stand it any longer and went away” unlike the Burmans. His departure reveals him as too horrified and the distancing perspective is conveyed by the fact that he is only told how much longer the elephant…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believe that Orwell wanted to kill the elephant because it had viciously killed a man and because he wanted to show the Burmese that he was no coward and could easily eradicate the elephant. Towards the end of the story, Orwell claimed that legally he had done the right thing by shooting the elephant. However, they have failed to analyze Orwell’s emotions and comments before and after the death of the animal. When observing the animal from a distance, Orwell describes it as peaceful and calm and tries to look for reasons not to shoot the creature. For example, when Orwell was in the rice field observing the elephant, he thought of maybe approaching it and if it reacted violently, he would shoot it. Yet, he eventually realized this would not work out because the elephant could kill him and the Burmese would end up laughing about it regardless. Furthermore, after Orwell shot the elephant one is able to tell that he had emotions of extreme guilt because he immediately walks away, disgusted at the terrible decision he had just made. Orwell could have made a better choice by leaving the animal alone despite the fact that the Burmese would think he was a coward, but feared the consequences and cared about his reputation more. In essence, Orwell truly did not want to harm the animal in any way but was pressured and left with no other option than to fend for…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This, I believe...

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is also a parallelism between the elephant and the imperialism of the British Empire. He did not want to conduct the act because it was too cruel to accept the fact that he is executing the inferior.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is clearly filled with rage, probably a quality the English empire had identified in him and found him suitable to carry out the task he was appointed for, regardless of how ill-educated he might seem or consider himself to be. As I read the events of the elephant’s “Must”, its attack and how Orwell managed to subdue the elephant, I couldn’t help but think it was almost as if he was using the elephant as a tool to showcase his “Must”. The essay is actually about him breaking-free from the chains that hold him back.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Orwell finally finds the elephant, he admits that, “I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him”...and that he “did not want to shoot the elephant” (Orwell 2). He ultimately falls into the expectations of the Burmese when he decides to shoot the elephant, despite the many reasons not to shoot it such as how it is worth more alive rather than…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On Killing a Tree

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thus, Orwell was in a mental conflict. He was an officer of the Empire which he hated. He had to serve the Empire and be an agent of oppression. On the other hand, he hated the Burmese for personal reasons, though he was on their side and he had sympathy. So he hated his job and thought of giving it up. While in Moulmein once, he had to shoot an elephant needlessly. It was an incident, which showed the hollowness of the British Empire, and it also showed how the British people, who seemed to be so powerful, were actually powerless puppets. The elephant which was in must had ravaged a bazaar, destroyed a hut, eaten up the fruits of a fruit stall and killed a cow. Orwell went out with his .44 Winchester Rifle to frighten the elephant away with the sound of the gun. The Burmese could not give him any definite information about the whereabouts of the elephant. At last he heard a shout from a lane of thatched huts. He went there and saw that the elephant had killed a Dravidian coolie. He thought that the elephant might…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays